Literature DB >> 17142190

Fruit and vegetable shopping practices and social support scales: A validation.

Tom Baranowski1, Mariam Missaghian, Alison Broadfoot, Kathy Watson, Karen Cullen, Theresa Nicklas, Jennifer Fisher, Janice Baranowski, Sharon O'Donnell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the psychometric characteristics of new scales of shopping practices and social support for purchasing fruits and vegetables.
DESIGN: Participants were recruited in front of diverse grocery stores. Telephone data collection was done on 2 occasions, separated by 6 weeks. PARTICIPANTS: 166 food shoppers with children at home participated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: New scales of food shopping practices and social support for purchasing fruits and vegetables were psychometrically analyzed and related to a measure of home fruit or vegetable availability as a test of construct validity. ANALYSIS: Both classical test and item response theory procedures were used. Correlations related the new measures to home fruit and vegetable availability.
RESULTS: Single dimension scales were specified for fruit and vegetable shopping practices (35% of the variance), fruit purchase social support (53% of the variance), and vegetable purchase social support (52% of the variance). Item response theory difficulty estimates varied from -0.64 to 0.73 for fruit and vegetable shopping practices, from -0.55 to 0.33 for fruit purchase social support, and from -0.55 to 0.34 for vegetable social support. Each scale significantly correlated with home fruit and vegetable availability (construct validity), even after controlling for social desirability of response (0.19 for shopping practices, 0.37 for fruit purchasing social support, and 0.28 for vegetable purchasing social support). Person separation reliability was 0.80 for food shopping practices, 0.74 for fruit purchasing social support, and 0.73 for vegetable purchasing social support.
CONCLUSION: The scales performed well. IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH AND PRACTICE: These scales are now available to help better understand fruit and vegetable shopping practices, fruit purchase social support, and vegetable purchase social support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17142190     DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2006.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav        ISSN: 1499-4046            Impact factor:   3.045


  9 in total

1.  Effectiveness of the Lunch is in the Bag program on communication between the parent, child and child-care provider around fruits, vegetables and whole grain foods: A group-randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Shreela V Sharma; Tasnuva Rashid; Nalini Ranjit; Courtney Byrd-Williams; Ru-Jye Chuang; Cynthia Roberts-Gray; Margaret Briley; Sara Sweitzer; Deanna M Hoelscher
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  What's Hoppin' in Hoptown?: Examining Fruit and Vegetable Consumption Among Hopkinsville's African American Community.

Authors:  Lindsay J Della; Siobhan E Smith; Latrica Best; Margaret U D'Silva
Journal:  Ky J Commun       Date:  2014

3.  Social support is a primary influence on home fruit, 100% juice, and vegetable availability.

Authors:  Tom Baranowski; Kathy Watson; Mariam Missaghian; Alison Broadfoot; Karen Cullen; Theresa Nicklas; Jennifer Fisher; Janice Baranowski; Sharon O'Donnell
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2008-07

4.  Parent packs, child eats: Surprising results of Lunch is in the Bag's efficacy trial.

Authors:  Cindy Roberts-Gray; Nalini Ranjit; Sara J Sweitzer; Courtney E Byrd-Williams; Maria Jose Romo-Palafox; Margaret E Briley; Deanna M Hoelscher
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.868

5.  Development and implementation of the National Cancer Institute's Food Attitudes and Behaviors Survey to assess correlates of fruit and vegetable intake in adults.

Authors:  Temitope O Erinosho; Courtney A Pinard; Linda C Nebeling; Richard P Moser; Abdul R Shaikh; Ken Resnicow; April Y Oh; Amy L Yaroch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Item response modeling: a psychometric assessment of the children's fruit, vegetable, water, and physical activity self-efficacy scales among Chinese children.

Authors:  Jing-Jing Wang; Tzu-An Chen; Tom Baranowski; Patrick W C Lau
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2017-09-16       Impact factor: 6.457

7.  Contextual determinants of health behaviours in an aboriginal community in Canada: pilot project.

Authors:  Pamela Joseph; A Darlene Davis; Ruby Miller; Karen Hill; Honey McCarthy; Ananya Banerjee; Clara Chow; Andrew Mente; Sonia S Anand
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Translating the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet for use in underresourced, urban African American communities, 2010.

Authors:  Melicia C Whitt-Glover; Jaimie C Hunter; Capri G Foy; Sara A Quandt; Mara Z Vitolins; Iris Leng; Lyndsey M Hornbuckle; Kara A Sanya; Alain G Bertoni
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.830

9.  A multi-level intervention in worksites to increase fruit and vegetable access and intake: Rationale, design and methods of the 'Good to Go' cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Patricia M Risica; Gemma Gorham; Laura Dionne; William Nardi; Doug Ng; Reese Middler; Jennifer Mello; Rahmet Akpolat; Katelyn Gettens; Kim M Gans
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 2.226

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.