Literature DB >> 17140901

Temporal trends in colorectal procedure use after colorectal cancer resection.

Gregory S Cooper1, Jonathan D Payes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: After curative cancer resection, routine colon surveillance is recommended. It is not known whether trends over time in cancer survivors parallel that of the general population.
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to describe temporal changes in the use of posttreatment procedures.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Linked tumor registry and Medicare claims data. PATIENTS: Medicare beneficiaries >65 years old who were diagnosed with local or regional stage colorectal cancer from 1992-2002 and who underwent surgical resection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Use of colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, or barium enema within 1 year, 18 months, or 3 years of diagnosis.
RESULTS: A total of 62,882 patients were followed up for 1 year and 35,784 for 3 years. Colonoscopy within 1 year was performed in 25.9%, within 18 months in 53.8%, and within 3 years in 70.3%. Corresponding rates for sigmoidoscopy were 7.4%, 10.2%, and 14.9%, respectively, and were 3.4%, 5.1%, and 7.9%, respectively, for barium enema. There was a decrease over time in the receipt of colonoscopy within 1 year of diagnosis (31.3% in 1992 to 20.6% in 2002), no change in 18-month rates, and a smaller increase in colonoscopy use within 3 years (66.5% to 72.3%). The use of sigmoidoscopy and barium enema declined over time. Overall procedure use within 1 year and 18 months also decreased and 3-year rates were essentially unchanged. These differences were maintained in multivariate analyses. LIMITATIONS: Accuracy of procedure coding and indications for tests could not be measured.
CONCLUSIONS: Temporal trends in procedure use in cancer survivors were consistent with the general population. Importantly, despite guideline recommendations and Medicare reimbursement, 25% of patients who undergo curative treatment do not receive surveillance examinations and this was unchanged over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17140901     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.08.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  12 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of alternative colonoscopy surveillance strategies to mitigate metachronous colorectal cancer incidence.

Authors:  Fatih Safa Erenay; Oguzhan Alagoz; Ritesh Banerjee; Adnan Said; Robert R Cima
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  Ethnic disparities in colonoscopy use among colorectal cancer survivors: a systematic review.

Authors:  Talya Salz; Heidi Woo; Tatiana D Starr; Lina H Jandorf; Katherine N DuHamel
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 4.442

3.  Are cancer registries a viable tool for cancer survivor outreach? A feasibility study.

Authors:  Melissa Y Carpentier; Jasmin A Tiro; Lara S Savas; L Kay Bartholomew; Trisha V Melhado; Sharon P Coan; Keith E Argenbright; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.442

4.  Many patients who undergo surgery for colorectal cancer receive surveillance colonoscopies earlier than recommended by guidelines.

Authors:  Amanpal Singh; Yong-Fang Kuo; James S Goodwin
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 11.382

5.  Variation in use of surveillance colonoscopy among colorectal cancer survivors in the United States.

Authors:  Talya Salz; Morris Weinberger; John Z Ayanian; Noel T Brewer; Craig C Earle; Jennifer Elston Lafata; Deborah A Fisher; Bryan J Weiner; Robert S Sandler
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 6.  Receipt of recommended surveillance among colorectal cancer survivors: a systematic review.

Authors:  Melissa Y Carpentier; Sally W Vernon; L Kay Bartholomew; Caitlin C Murphy; Shirley M Bluethmann
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 4.442

7.  Association of health beliefs and colonoscopy use among survivors of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Talya Salz; Noel T Brewer; Robert S Sandler; Bryan J Weiner; Christopher F Martin; Morris Weinberger
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 8.  Patterns of colorectal cancer care in the United States and Canada: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eboneé N Butler; Neetu Chawla; Jennifer Lund; Linda C Harlan; Joan L Warren; K Robin Yabroff
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2013

9.  Colorectal cancer survivors' needs and preferences for survivorship information.

Authors:  Talya Salz; Shrujal S Baxi; Victoria S Blinder; Elena B Elkin; Margaret M Kemeny; Mary S McCabe; Chaya S Moskowitz; Erin E Onstad; Leonard B Saltz; Larissa K F Temple; Kevin C Oeffinger
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.840

10.  Patient-clinician information engagement improves adherence to colorectal cancer surveillance after curative treatment: results from a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Andy S L Tan; Mihaela Moldovan-Johnson; Sarah Parvanta; Stacy W Gray; Katrina Armstrong; Robert C Hornik
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-08-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.