Literature DB >> 17140527

Restoration of primary teeth: clinical criteria for assessment of the literature.

M E J Curzon1, K J Toumba.   

Abstract

AIM: This is was to establish a system of clinically based criteria for the assessment of papers published in peer reviewed journals concerning the use of restorative techniques in primary teeth.
BACKGROUND: Various publications that consider the approaches to be taken to setting up assessment criteria with the dental/medical literature were reviewed. These included the so called 'Cochrane criteria'. On the basis of this review a set of clinically based criteria were drawn up that were then used to produce a list of criteria to be used in a series of systematic reviews of the literature concerning the various restorative techniques, materials and medicaments for pulp therapy and the restoration of primary teeth.
RESULTS: There were 23 criteria that were felt to be appropriate. The list of 23 criteria were deemed to be appropriate for pulp therapy and 21 for restorative techniques and materials. Conclusion.A set of clinically based criteria is suggested for the systematic review of publications on restorative techniques for primary teeth.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17140527     DOI: 10.1007/bf03320814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent        ISSN: 1818-6300


  6 in total

Review 1.  Preformed metal crowns for primary and permanent molar teeth: review of the literature.

Authors:  Ros C Randall
Journal:  Pediatr Dent       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.874

2.  Overview of the evidence for clinical interventions in pediatric dentistry.

Authors:  Yogita Butani; Steven M Levy; Arthur J Nowak; Michael J Kanellis; Keith Heller; Arthur J Hartz; Deborah V Dawson; Catherine A Watkins
Journal:  Pediatr Dent       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.874

3.  The fate and survival of amalgam and preformed crown molar restorations placed in a specialist paediatric dental practice.

Authors:  J F Roberts; M Sherriff
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  1990-10-20       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Rationale for systematic reviews.

Authors:  C D Mulrow
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-09-03

5.  Fluoride supplements and fluorosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  A I Ismail; R R Bandekar
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.383

6.  Does the dental profession know how to care for the primary dentition?

Authors:  K M Milsom; M Tickle; D King
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2003-09-27       Impact factor: 1.626

  6 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Durability of amalgam in the restoration of class II cavities in primary molars: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  N M Kilpatrick; A Neumann
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2007-03

Review 2.  Restoration of class II cavities in primary molar teeth with conventional and resin modified glass ionomer cements: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  B L Chadwick; D J P Evans
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2007-03

3.  Effect of thermo-mechanical loading on marginal quality and wear of primary molar crowns.

Authors:  N Krämer; H Rudolph; F Garcia-Godoy; R Frankenberger
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2012-08

Review 4.  Restoration of primary teeth with crowns: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  N Attari; J F Roberts
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2006-06

Review 5.  Anterior crowns for primary anterior teeth: an evidence based assessment of the literature.

Authors:  W F Waggoner
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2006-06

Review 6.  Pulpotomy in primary teeth: review of the literature according to standardized criteria.

Authors:  A B Fuks; L Papagiannoulis
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2006-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.