Literature DB >> 17137985

Normal-eye Zernike coefficients and root-mean-square wavefront errors.

Thomas O Salmon1, Corina van de Pol.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare aberrometry measurements from multiple sites and compute mean Zernike coefficients and root-mean-square (RMS) values for the entire data pool to serve as a reference set for normal, healthy adult eyes.
SETTING: Northeastern State University, Tahlequah, Oklahoma, USA.
METHODS: Data were collected from 10 laboratories that measured higher-order aberrations (HOAs) in normal, healthy adult eyes using Shack-Hartmann aberrometry (2560 eyes of 1433 subjects). Signed Zernike coefficients were scaled to pupil diameters of 6.0 mm, 5.0 mm, 4.0 mm, and 3.0 mm and corrected to a common wavelength of 550 nm. The mean signed and absolute Zernike coefficients across data sets were compared. Then, the following were computed: overall mean values for signed and absolute Zernike coefficients; polar Zernike magnitudes and RMS values for coma-like aberrations (Z(3)(+/-1) and Z(5)(+/-1) combined); spherical-like aberrations (Z(4)(0) and Z(6)(0) combined); and 3rd-, 4th-, 5th-, and 6th-order, and higher-order aberrations (orders 3 to 6).
RESULTS: The different data sets showed good agreement for Zernike coefficients values across most higher-order modes, with greater variability for Z(4)(0) and Z(3)(-1). The most prominent modes and their mean absolute values (6.0-mm pupil) were, respectively, Z(3)(-1) and 0.14 microm, Z(4)(0) and 0.13 microm, and Z(3)(-3) and 0.11 microm. The mean total higher-order RMS was 0.33 microm.
CONCLUSIONS: There was a general consensus for the magnitude of HOAs expected in normal adult human eyes. At least 90% of the sample had aberrations less than double the mean values reported here. These values can serve as a set of reference norms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17137985     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.07.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  48 in total

Review 1.  [Application of wavefront analysis in clinical and scientific settings. From irregular astigmatism to aberrations of a higher order--Part II: examples].

Authors:  J Bühren; T Kohnen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  The impact of higher-order aberrations on the strength of directional signals produced by accommodative microfluctuations.

Authors:  Sangeetha Metlapally; Jianliang L Tong; Humza J Tahir; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  In vivo imaging of human photoreceptor mosaic with wavefront sensorless adaptive optics optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Kevin S K Wong; Yifan Jian; Michelle Cua; Stefano Bonora; Robert J Zawadzki; Marinko V Sarunic
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Corneal Higher-Order Aberrations in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Ultrathin DSAEK in the Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trial: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Matthew J Duggan; Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer; Charles C Lin; Ariana Austin; Paula C Labadzinzki; Winston D Chamberlain
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2019-02-16       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  High temporal resolution aberrometry in a 50-eye population and implications for adaptive optics error budget.

Authors:  Jessica Jarosz; Pedro Mecê; Jean-Marc Conan; Cyril Petit; Michel Paques; Serge Meimon
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  Objective functional visual outcomes of cataract surgery in patients with good preoperative visual acuity.

Authors:  X Zhu; H Ye; W He; J Yang; J Dai; Y Lu
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Pilot study of hyperopic LASIK using the solid-state laser technology.

Authors:  David P Piñero; Francisco J Blanes-Mompó; Pedro Ruiz-Fortes; Rafael J Pérez-Cambrodí; Antonio Alzamora-Rodríguez
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Aberrometry Repeatability and Agreement with Autorefraction.

Authors:  Mylan T Nguyen; David A Berntsen
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Impact of contact lens zone geometry and ocular optics on bifocal retinal image quality.

Authors:  Arthur Bradley; Jayoung Nam; Renfeng Xu; Leslie Harman; Larry Thibos
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Normative best-corrected values of the visual image quality metric VSX as a function of age and pupil size.

Authors:  Gareth D Hastings; Jason D Marsack; Larry N Thibos; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 2.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.