Literature DB >> 17137453

Participation in cervical screening by Indigenous women in the Northern Territory: a longitudinal study.

Philippa L Binns1, John R Condon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of the Northern Territory Women's Cancer Prevention Program in improving cervical screening participation for Indigenous women.
DESIGN: Descriptive longitudinal period prevalence study. PARTICIPANTS: All NT resident women aged 20-69 years who had at least one Pap smear recorded on the NT Pap Smear Register between 1997 and 2004. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Indirectly estimated percentage of NT Indigenous women in rural and remote areas with a predominantly Indigenous population (accounting for 55% of the NT Indigenous population) who participated in screening, in biennial periods between 1997 and 2004. Participation by all eligible NT women (both Indigenous and non-Indigenous) is also reported by region for the same period.
RESULTS: In 1997-1998, estimated participation for Indigenous women was about half the national rate (33.9% [95% CI, 32.6%-35.2%] v 63.9% [95% CI, 63.8%-63.9%]). Participation increased to 44.0% (95% CI, 42.7%-45.4%) in 1999-2000, and changed little thereafter; participation was higher in the Top End compared with Central Australia, and varied from 16.6% to 75.0% between remote areas. Participation rates for all women living in rural/remote regions were lower than those in urban regions.
CONCLUSIONS: Recruitment of Indigenous women for cervical screening has improved since 1999. This may have partly contributed to the fall in their cervical cancer incidence and mortality in recent years. Although in most areas Indigenous participation is lower than national levels, in one area it was considerably higher. Improvements can be achieved by learning from these communities, to further close the gap in morbidity and mortality between Indigenous and non-Indigenous women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17137453     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00663.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  12 in total

1.  Avoiding piecemeal research on participation in cervical cancer screening: the advantages of a social identity framework.

Authors:  Candice Tribe; Janine Webb
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Gardasil® - The New HPV Vaccine: The Right Product, the Right Time? A Commentary.

Authors:  Joel Lexchin; Neil Arya; Sonal Singh
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2010-05

3.  Low rates of postpartum glucose screening among indigenous and non-indigenous women in Australia with gestational diabetes.

Authors:  Catherine Chamberlain; Anna McLean; Jeremy Oats; Brian Oldenburg; Sandra Eades; Ashim Sinha; Rory Wolfe
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-03

4.  Disparities in cancer care in australia and the pacific.

Authors:  Ian Olver; Franca Marine; Paul Grogan
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-03-16

Review 5.  Australia's national bowel cancer screening program: does it work for indigenous Australians?

Authors:  Aliki Christou; Judith M Katzenellenbogen; Sandra C Thompson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Using probabilistic record linkage methods to identify Australian Indigenous women on the Queensland Pap Smear Register: the National Indigenous Cervical Screening Project.

Authors:  Lisa J Whop; Abbey Diaz; Peter Baade; Gail Garvey; Joan Cunningham; Julia M L Brotherton; Karen Canfell; Patricia C Valery; Dianne L O'Connell; Catherine Taylor; Suzanne P Moore; John R Condon
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Understanding, beliefs and perspectives of Aboriginal people in Western Australia about cancer and its impact on access to cancer services.

Authors:  Shaouli Shahid; Lizzie Finn; Dawn Bessarab; Sandra C Thompson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  A cost-based equity weight for use in the economic evaluation of primary health care interventions: case study of the Australian Indigenous population.

Authors:  Katherine S Ong; Margaret Kelaher; Ian Anderson; Rob Carter
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2009-10-07

9.  The first comprehensive report on Indigenous Australian women's inequalities in cervical screening: A retrospective registry cohort study in Queensland, Australia (2000-2011).

Authors:  Lisa J Whop; Gail Garvey; Peter Baade; Joan Cunningham; Kamalini Lokuge; Julia M L Brotherton; Patricia C Valery; Dianne L O'Connell; Karen Canfell; Abbey Diaz; David Roder; Dorota Gertig; Suzanne P Moore; John R Condon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Indigenous Australian women's experiences of participation in cervical screening.

Authors:  Tamara L Butler; Kate Anderson; John R Condon; Gail Garvey; Julia M L Brotherton; Joan Cunningham; Allison Tong; Suzanne P Moore; Clare M Maher; Jacqueline K Mein; Eloise F Warren; Lisa J Whop
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.