Literature DB >> 17136921

Pastoral relationships and holding work in primary care: affect, subjectivity and chronicity.

Simon Cocksedge1, Carl May.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To understand family doctors' constructs of long-term therapeutic relationships with patients in primary care.
METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were administered to general practitioners with > 5 years of experience (n = 28) working in an English semi-rural district, and the results were subjected to constant comparative qualitative analysis.
RESULTS: Participants identified pastoral relationships as long-standing patterns of doctor-patient interaction aimed at providing reliable supportive care indirectly concerned with clinical medicine. Holding work was identified as a technique for structuring and delivering care within pastoral relationships. Pastoral relationships and holding work were seen as valuable in the affective management of people with long-standing chronic illness, especially mild-to-moderate depression and anxiety. DISCUSSION: At a time when primary care is undergoing significant structural change, respondents in this study laid emphasis on personal and continuing relationships with patients who had diffuse needs connected with the experience of complex and chronic problems, and their accounts intimately connected life events with health status. Importantly, these accounts suggest that such relationships are hard to define and therefore hard to measure, but have important therapeutic purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 17136921     DOI: 10.1177/17423953050010020101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chronic Illn        ISSN: 1742-3953


  4 in total

1.  Holding relationships in primary care: a qualitative exploration of doctors' and patients' perceptions.

Authors:  Simon Cocksedge; Rebecca Greenfield; G Kelly Nugent; Carolyn Chew-Graham
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care.

Authors:  Carl May
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  General practitioners' views on reattribution for patients with medically unexplained symptoms: a questionnaire and qualitative study.

Authors:  Christopher Dowrick; Linda Gask; John G Hughes; Huw Charles-Jones; Judith A Hogg; Sarah Peters; Peter Salmon; Anne R Rogers; Richard K Morriss
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 2.497

4.  Why do general practitioners decline training to improve management of medically unexplained symptoms?

Authors:  Peter Salmon; Sarah Peters; Rebecca Clifford; Wendy Iredale; Linda Gask; Anne Rogers; Christopher Dowrick; John Hughes; Richard Morriss
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.128

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.