Literature DB >> 17134321

Recurrent cerebellar loops simplify adaptive control of redundant and nonlinear motor systems.

John Porrill1, Paul Dean.   

Abstract

We have described elsewhere an adaptive filter model of cerebellar learning in which the cerebellar microcircuit acts to decorrelate motor commands from their sensory consequences (Dean, Porrill, & Stone, 2002). Learning stability required the cerebellar microcircuit to be embedded in a recurrent loop, and this has been shown to lead to a simple and modular adaptive control architecture when applied to the linearized 3D vestibular ocular reflex (Porrill, Dean, & Stone, 2004). Here we investigate the properties of recurrent loop connectivity in the case of redundant and nonlinear motor systems and illustrate them using the example of kinematic control of a simulated two-joint robot arm. We demonstrate that (1) the learning rule does not require unavailable motor error signals or complex neural reference structures to estimate such signals (i.e., it solves the motor error problem) and (2) control of redundant systems is not subject to the nonconvexity problem in which incorrect average motor commands are learned for end-effector positions that can be accessed in more than one arm configuration. These properties suggest a central functional role for the closed cerebellar loops, which have been shown to be ubiquitous in motor systems (e.g., Kelly & Strick, 2003).

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17134321     DOI: 10.1162/neco.2007.19.1.170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neural Comput        ISSN: 0899-7667            Impact factor:   2.026


  10 in total

1.  Adaptive-filter models of the cerebellum: computational analysis.

Authors:  Paul Dean; John Porrill
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 2.  Computational Principles of Supervised Learning in the Cerebellum.

Authors:  Jennifer L Raymond; Javier F Medina
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-08       Impact factor: 12.449

3.  Cortical network modeling for inverse kinematic computation of an anthropomorphic finger.

Authors:  Rodolphe J Gentili; Hyuk Oh; Javier Molina; José L Contreras-Vidal
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2011

4.  Sensory prediction or motor control? Application of marr-albus type models of cerebellar function to classical conditioning.

Authors:  Nathan F Lepora; John Porrill; Christopher H Yeo; Paul Dean
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 2.380

5.  How the credit assignment problems in motor control could be solved after the cerebellum predicts increases in error.

Authors:  Sergio O Verduzco-Flores; Randall C O'Reilly
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  A realistic bi-hemispheric model of the cerebellum uncovers the purpose of the abundant granule cells during motor control.

Authors:  Ruben-Dario Pinzon-Morales; Yutaka Hirata
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.492

Review 7.  Are Purkinje Cell Pauses Drivers of Classically Conditioned Blink Responses?

Authors:  Dan-Anders Jirenhed; Germund Hesslow
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.847

8.  Silent synapses, LTP, and the indirect parallel-fibre pathway: computational consequences of optimal cerebellar noise-processing.

Authors:  John Porrill; Paul Dean
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Biohybrid Control of General Linear Systems Using the Adaptive Filter Model of Cerebellum.

Authors:  Emma D Wilson; Tareq Assaf; Martin J Pearson; Jonathan M Rossiter; Paul Dean; Sean R Anderson; John Porrill
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Cerebellar-inspired algorithm for adaptive control of nonlinear dielectric elastomer-based artificial muscle.

Authors:  Emma D Wilson; Tareq Assaf; Martin J Pearson; Jonathan M Rossiter; Sean R Anderson; John Porrill; Paul Dean
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.118

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.