Literature DB >> 17133897

Attitudes toward disease and prognosis disclosure and decision making for terminally ill patients in Japan, based on a nationwide random sampling survey of the general population and medical practitioners.

Mitsunori Miyashita1, Shuji Hashimoto, Masako Kawa, Yasuo Shima, Hiromi Kawagoe, Tsuneto Hase, Yae Shinjo, Keiichi Suemasu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Employing a nationwide cross-sectional survey, we investigated the Japanese general population's attitudes toward disease and prognosis disclosure and related factors. Furthermore, we investigated Japanese medical practitioners' attitudes toward disease and prognosis disclosure for patients and decision making.
METHODS: A nationwide anonymous questionnaire survey was conducted. A total of 5000 individuals were randomly sampled from the general population and 3104 physicians and 6059 nurses were randomly sampled in Japan.
RESULTS: Finally, 2422 people from the general population (response rate, 48%), 1577 physicians (51%), and 3361 nurses (56%) returned questionnaires. Among the general population, 73% of participants answered that they "want to know" about their disease and prognosis when in an incurable disease state. Ninety percent desired direct disclosure and 8% disclosure through their family. However, few medical practitioners answered "patient himself" (physician 3%, nurses 4%) as the person whom they would primarily notify about the disease and prognosis when in charge of a patient with an incurable disease. On the other hand, physicians answered "family" most frequently (59%), whereas nurses most commonly responded, "depends on patient's condition" (63%). SIGNIFICANCE OF RESEARCH: Several detailed analyses of factors associated with prognosis disclosure were conducted. Japanese physicians need to carefully communicate with the patients individually about whether direct disclosure or disclosure primarily to the family is preferred.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17133897     DOI: 10.1017/s1478951506060482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Palliat Support Care        ISSN: 1478-9515


  6 in total

Review 1.  Reluctance to disclose difficult diagnoses: a narrative review comparing communication by psychiatrists and oncologists.

Authors:  Alex J Mitchell
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Can oncologists predict survival for patients with progressive disease after standard chemotherapies?

Authors:  T K Taniyama; K Hashimoto; N Katsumata; A Hirakawa; K Yonemori; M Yunokawa; C Shimizu; K Tamura; M Ando; Y Fujiwara
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Constructing understandings of end-of-life care in Europe: a qualitative study involving cognitive interviewing with implications for cross-national surveys.

Authors:  Barbara A Daveson; Dorothee Bechinger-English; Claudia Bausewein; Steffan T Simon; Richard Harding; Irene J Higginson; Barbara Gomes On Behalf Of Prisma
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.947

4.  Breaking Cancer Bad News to Patients With Cancer: A Comprehensive Perspective of Patients, Their Relatives, and the Public-Example From a Middle Eastern Country.

Authors:  Jamal Zekri; Syed Mustafa Karim
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2016-04-20

5.  Reducing collusion between family members and clinicians of patients referred to the palliative care team.

Authors:  James Alvin Low; Sim Lai Kiow; Norhisham Main; Koh Kim Luan; Pang Weng Sun; May Lim
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2009

6.  Patients' perception and actual practice of informed consent, privacy and confidentiality in general medical outpatient departments of two tertiary care hospitals of Lahore.

Authors:  Ayesha Humayun; Noor Fatima; Shahid Naqqash; Salwa Hussain; Almas Rasheed; Huma Imtiaz; Sardar Zakariya Imam
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 2.652

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.