BACKGROUND: Little is understood about the factors that influence survival in patients who undergo gamma-knife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases. METHODS: Demographic, disease, treatment, and survival data on 334 patients with intracranial metastases who underwent initial SRS from 1998 to 2004 were abstracted from treatment records and from the Connecticut Tumor Registry. Multivariate survival analysis was used to identify factors that independently affected survival. RESULTS: The median age of the patient population was 57.3 years. The median number of lesions treated in a single session was 2 (range, 1-36 lesions treated). The most common tumor histologies were nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (36%), breast cancer (16%), and melanoma (16%). Three hundred patients (90%) had confirmed deaths; the median survival after SRS was 8.1 months. Survival was significantly better in patients who had from 1 to 3 metastases (median, 8.5 months) compared with patients who had > or =4 metastases (median, 6.3 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.65; P = .003). In the subgroup of patients who had from 1 to 3 metastases, systemic control (HR, 0.49; P < .001), breast cancer (HR, 0.57; P = .003), and total tumor volume < 5 cc (HR, 0.65; P = .002) were associated independently with increased survival, and esophageal cancer (HR, 2.36; P = .042) was associated with decreased survival. In the subgroup of patients who had > or =4 metastases, only age <45 years was associated independently with increased survival (HR, 0.39; P = .006); and melanoma (HR, 2.32; P = .008) and the receipt chemotherapy (HR, 2.59; P = .077) were associated with decreased survival. Sex, race, metastases location, whole-brain radiation, and cranial surgery had no independent associations with altered survival. CONCLUSIONS: The data from this study suggested that different factors affected survival in patients who had from 1 to 3 metastases and patients who had > or =4 metastases. Further research into this area may clarify causes for this discrepancy and improve prognostication. (c) 2006 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND: Little is understood about the factors that influence survival in patients who undergo gamma-knife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases. METHODS: Demographic, disease, treatment, and survival data on 334 patients with intracranial metastases who underwent initial SRS from 1998 to 2004 were abstracted from treatment records and from the Connecticut Tumor Registry. Multivariate survival analysis was used to identify factors that independently affected survival. RESULTS: The median age of the patient population was 57.3 years. The median number of lesions treated in a single session was 2 (range, 1-36 lesions treated). The most common tumor histologies were nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (36%), breast cancer (16%), and melanoma (16%). Three hundred patients (90%) had confirmed deaths; the median survival after SRS was 8.1 months. Survival was significantly better in patients who had from 1 to 3 metastases (median, 8.5 months) compared with patients who had > or =4 metastases (median, 6.3 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.65; P = .003). In the subgroup of patients who had from 1 to 3 metastases, systemic control (HR, 0.49; P < .001), breast cancer (HR, 0.57; P = .003), and total tumor volume < 5 cc (HR, 0.65; P = .002) were associated independently with increased survival, and esophageal cancer (HR, 2.36; P = .042) was associated with decreased survival. In the subgroup of patients who had > or =4 metastases, only age <45 years was associated independently with increased survival (HR, 0.39; P = .006); and melanoma (HR, 2.32; P = .008) and the receipt chemotherapy (HR, 2.59; P = .077) were associated with decreased survival. Sex, race, metastases location, whole-brain radiation, and cranial surgery had no independent associations with altered survival. CONCLUSIONS: The data from this study suggested that different factors affected survival in patients who had from 1 to 3 metastases and patients who had > or =4 metastases. Further research into this area may clarify causes for this discrepancy and improve prognostication. (c) 2006 American Cancer Society.
Authors: Timothy J Kaufmann; Marion Smits; Jerrold Boxerman; Raymond Huang; Daniel P Barboriak; Michael Weller; Caroline Chung; Christina Tsien; Paul D Brown; Lalitha Shankar; Evanthia Galanis; Elizabeth Gerstner; Martin J van den Bent; Terry C Burns; Ian F Parney; Gavin Dunn; Priscilla K Brastianos; Nancy U Lin; Patrick Y Wen; Benjamin M Ellingson Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2020-06-09 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Apostolia Maria Tsimberidou; Katherine Letourneau; Sijin Wen; Jennifer Wheler; David Hong; Aung Naing; Nancy G Iskander; Cynthia Uehara; Razelle Kurzrock Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-03-17 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Yan Xing; Yulia Bronstein; Merrick I Ross; Robert L Askew; Jeffrey E Lee; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Richard Royal; Janice N Cormier Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2010-11-16 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Assaf Berger; Kenneth Bernstein; Juan Diego Alzate; Reed Mullen; Joshua S Silverman; Erik P Sulman; Bernadine R Donahue; Anna C Pavlick; Jason Gurewitz; Monica Mureb; Janice Mehnert; Kathleen Madden; Amy Palermo; Jeffrey S Weber; John G Golfinos; Douglas Kondziolka Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2022-06-04 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: M Staudt; K Lasithiotakis; U Leiter; F Meier; T Eigentler; M Bamberg; M Tatagiba; P Brossart; C Garbe Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-04-06 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Florian Sterzing; Thomas Welzel; Gabriele Sroka-Perez; Kai Schubert; Jürgen Debus; Klaus K Herfarth Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2009-02-25 Impact factor: 3.621