Literature DB >> 17131100

[Shoulder prostheses].

E Wiedemann1.   

Abstract

The design of shoulder prostheses has been developed through four generations which mirror adaptation to our increasing knowledge of the biomechanics of the shoulder joint. Modern shoulder prostheses are adapted to the size, inclination, posterior offset, and retrotorsion of the shoulder. The main reasons for implantation of a shoulder prosthesis are primary osteoarthritis, posttraumatic and rheumatoid arthritis, avascular necrosis, instability arthritis and cuff defect arthropathy. Typical implants are cup prostheses for surface replacement, anatomical stem prostheses, and reverse prostheses. Total prostheses are functionally better as soon as the arthritis involves the glenoid, whereas hemiprostheses should be preferred as long as the glenoid is intact. The stem is mostly cemented, whereas in younger patients with good bone quality a cementless stem may be used. Cemented glenoids may be considered as standard.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17131100     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-006-1204-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  9 in total

1.  Loosening performance of cemented glenoid prosthesis design pairs.

Authors:  C Anglin; U P Wyss; R W Nyffeler; C Gerber
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Measurement of glenoid version: conventional radiographs versus computed tomography scans.

Authors:  Richard W Nyffeler; Bernhard Jost; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Christian Gerber
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Uncemented glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty. Survivorship and outcomes.

Authors:  Scott David Martin; David Zurakowski; Thomas S Thornhill
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 4.  A comparison of pain, strength, range of motion, and functional outcomes after hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis of the shoulder. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dianne Bryant; Robert Litchfield; Michael Sandow; Gary M Gartsman; Gordon Guyatt; Alexandra Kirkley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Modular hemiarthroplasty for fractures of the proximal part of the humerus.

Authors:  B H Moeckel; D M Dines; R F Warren; D W Altchek
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 6.  Osteonecrosis of bone. Current concepts as to etiology and pathogenesis.

Authors:  R L Cruess
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Cementless surface replacement arthroplasty (Copeland CSRA) for osteoarthritis of the shoulder.

Authors:  Ofer Levy; Stephen A Copeland
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Dislocation arthropathy of the shoulder.

Authors:  R L Samilson; V Prieto
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Delta shoulder prosthesis for rotator cuff rupture.

Authors:  P M Grammont; E Baulot
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.390

  9 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  [Shoulder replacement in arthritis of the shoulder joint].

Authors:  T Ambacher
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.004

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.