Literature DB >> 17130191

Beneficial associations of physical activity with 2-h but not fasting blood glucose in Australian adults: the AusDiab study.

Genevieve N Healy1, David W Dunstan, Jonathan E Shaw, Paul Z Zimmet, Neville Owen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We examined the associations of physical activity with fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and with 2-h postload plasma glucose (2-h PG) in men and women with low, moderate, and high waist circumference. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle (AusDiab) study provided data on a population-based cross-sectional sample of 4,108 men and 5,106 women aged >or=25 years without known diabetes or health conditions that could affect physical activity. FPG and 2-h PG were obtained from an oral glucose tolerance test. Self-reported physical activity level was defined according to the current public health guidelines as active (>or=150 min/week across five or more sessions) or inactive (<150 min/week and/or less than five sessions). Sex-specific quintiles of physical activity time were used to ascertain dose response.
RESULTS: Being physically active and total physical activity time were independently and negatively associated with 2-h PG. When physical activity level was considered within each waist circumference category, 2-h PG was significantly lower in active high-waist circumference women (beta -0.30 [95% CI -0.59 to -0.01], P = 0.044) and active low-waist circumference men (beta -0.25 [-0.49 to -0.02], P = 0.036) compared with their inactive counterparts. Considered across physical activity and waist circumference categories, 2-h PG levels were not significantly different between active moderate-waist circumference participants and active low-waist circumference participants. Associations between physical activity and FPG were nonsignificant.
CONCLUSIONS: There are important differences between 2-h PG and FPG related to physical activity. It appears that 2-h PG is more sensitive to the beneficial effects of physical activity, and these benefits occur across the waist circumference spectrum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17130191     DOI: 10.2337/dc06-0313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  27 in total

1.  Objective light-intensity physical activity associations with rated health in older adults.

Authors:  Matthew P Buman; Eric B Hekler; William L Haskell; Leslie Pruitt; Terry L Conway; Kelli L Cain; James F Sallis; Brian E Saelens; Lawrence D Frank; Abby C King
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Association of Habitual Daily Physical Activity With Glucose Tolerance and β-Cell Function in Adults With Impaired Glucose Tolerance or Recently Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes From the Restoring Insulin Secretion (RISE) Study.

Authors:  Karla A Temple; Ashley H Tjaden; Karen M Atkinson; Elena Barengolts; Tamara S Hannon; Kieren J Mather; Kristina M Utzschneider; Sharon L Edelstein; David A Ehrmann; Babak Mokhlesi
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Glucose effectiveness, but not insulin sensitivity, is improved after short-term interval training in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a controlled, randomised, crossover trial.

Authors:  Kristian Karstoft; Margaret A Clark; Ida Jakobsen; Sine H Knudsen; Gerrit van Hall; Bente K Pedersen; Thomas P J Solomon
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 4.  Benefit of lifestyle-based T2DM prevention is influenced by prediabetes phenotype.

Authors:  Matthew D Campbell; Thirunavukkarasu Sathish; Paul Z Zimmet; Kavumpurathu R Thankappan; Brian Oldenburg; David R Owens; Jonathan E Shaw; Robyn J Tapp
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 43.330

5.  Sedentary behavior and mortality in older women: the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  Rebecca Seguin; David M Buchner; Jingmin Liu; Matthew Allison; Todd Manini; Ching-Yun Wang; Joann E Manson; Catherine R Messina; Mahesh J Patel; Larry Moreland; Marcia L Stefanick; Andrea Z Lacroix
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Sex differences in diabetes risk and the effect of intensive lifestyle modification in the Diabetes Prevention Program.

Authors:  Leigh Perreault; Yong Ma; Sam Dagogo-Jack; Edward Horton; David Marrero; Jill Crandall; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Determinants of progression from impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance to diabetes in a high-risk screened population: 3 year follow-up in the ADDITION study, Denmark.

Authors:  S S Rasmussen; C Glümer; A Sandbaek; T Lauritzen; K Borch-Johnsen
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 10.122

8.  Objectively measured moderate- and vigorous-intensity physical activity but not sedentary time predicts insulin resistance in high-risk individuals.

Authors:  Ulf Ekelund; Soren Brage; Simon J Griffin; Nicholas J Wareham
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Confusion and conflict in assessing the physical activity status of middle-aged men.

Authors:  Dylan Thompson; Alan M Batterham; Daniella Markovitch; Natalie C Dixon; Adam J S Lund; Jean-Philippe Walhin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Resistance exercise training lowers HbA1c more than aerobic training in adults with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Salameh Bweir; Muhammed Al-Jarrah; Abdul-Majeed Almalty; Mikhled Maayah; Irina V Smirnova; Lesya Novikova; Lisa Stehno-Bittel
Journal:  Diabetol Metab Syndr       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 3.320

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.