Literature DB >> 17130188

Action or inaction? Decision making in patients with diabetes and elevated blood pressure in primary care.

Paul C Hicks1, John M Westfall, Rebecca F Van Vorst, Caroline Bublitz Emsermann, L Miriam Dickinson, Wilson Pace, Bennett Parnes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Hypertension increases micro- and macrovascular complications of diabetes. The goal for blood pressure is <130/80 mmHg. In primary care, however, blood pressure in many patients exceeds this goal. In this study, we evaluated the clinical decision-making process when a patient with diabetes presents with elevated blood pressure. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty-six primary care practices in two practice-based research networks in Colorado participated. Questionnaires were completed after each encounter with an adult with type 2 diabetes. Data obtained from the survey included 1) demographic information, 2) blood pressure results, 3) action taken, 4) type of action if action was taken, and 5) reasons for inaction if action was not taken. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of action.
RESULTS: Completed surveys totaled 778. Blood pressure was 130/74 +/- 18.8/12.0 mmHg (mean +/- SD). Sixty-two percent of patients exceeded goals. Action was taken to lower blood pressure in 34.9% of those. Predictors of action were 1) blood pressure level, 2) total number of medicines the patient was taking, and 3) patient already taking medicines for blood pressure. As blood pressure rose, providers attributed inaction more often to "competing demands" and reasons other than "blood pressure being at or near goal."
CONCLUSIONS: No evidence was found for patterns of poor care among primary care physicians. Providers balance the clinical circumstances, including how elevated the blood pressure is, and issues of polypharmacy, medication side effects, and costs when determining the best course of action. Knowledge deficit is not a common cause of inaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17130188     DOI: 10.2337/dc06-1124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  15 in total

1.  So much to do, so little time: care for the socially disadvantaged and the 15-minute visit.

Authors:  Kevin Fiscella; Ronald M Epstein
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-09-22

2.  Patients' Future Expectations for Diabetes and Hypertension Treatments: "Through the Diet… I Think This is Going to Go Away."

Authors:  Paige C Fairchild; Aviva G Nathan; Michael Quinn; Elbert S Huang; Neda Laiteerapong
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and hypertension treatment intensification: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Jean-Pascal Fournier; Agnès Sommet; Robert Bourrel; Stéphane Oustric; Atul Pathak; Maryse Lapeyre-Mestre; Jean-Louis Montastruc
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-04-15       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Card studies for observational research in practice.

Authors:  John M Westfall; Linda Zittleman; Elizabeth W Staton; Bennett Parnes; Peter C Smith; Linda J Niebauer; Douglas H Fernald; Javan Quintela; Rebecca F Van Vorst; L Miriam Dickinson; Wilson D Pace
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  First Things First: Difficulty with Current Medications Is Associated With Patient Willingness to Add New Ones.

Authors:  Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Timothy P Hofer; Mandi L Klamerus; Eve A Kerr
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Failure to intensify antihypertensive treatment by primary care providers: a cohort study in adults with diabetes mellitus and hypertension.

Authors:  Shari Danielle Bolen; T Alafia Samuels; Hsin-Chieh Yeh; Spyridon S Marinopoulos; Maura McGuire; Marcela Abuid; Frederick L Brancati
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-01-25       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Prevention and noninvasive management of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Martial G Bourassa; Colin Berry
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.113

8.  An Electronic Adherence Measurement Intervention to Reduce Clinical Inertia in the Treatment of Uncontrolled Hypertension: The MATCH Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Ian M Kronish; Nathalie Moise; Thomas McGinn; Yan Quan; William Chaplin; Benjamin D Gallagher; Karina W Davidson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  The impact of a decision support tool linked to an electronic medical record on glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Waruna Gunathilake; Sajith Gunawardena; Ranga Fernando; George Thomson; Devaka Fernando
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-05-01

10.  Differential effects of comorbidity on antihypertensive and glucose-regulating treatment in diabetes mellitus--a cohort study.

Authors:  Jaco Voorham; Flora M Haaijer-Ruskamp; Bruce H R Wolffenbuttel; Dick de Zeeuw; Ronald P Stolk; Petra Denig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.