Literature DB >> 1712836

Treatment of advanced-stage Hodgkin's disease: alternating noncrossresistant MOPP/CABS is not superior to MOPP.

D L Longo1, P L Duffey, V T DeVita, P H Wiernik, S M Hubbard, J C Phares, A W Bastian, E S Jaffe, R C Young.   

Abstract

One hundred twenty-five assessable patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin's disease were randomized to receive mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (MOPP) or MOPP alternating with lomustine (CCNU), doxorubicin, bleomycin, and streptozocin (CABS). The median follow-up is 7.7 years. The complete response rate was 60 of 66 MOPP-treated patients (91%) and 54 of 59 MOPP/CABS-treated patients (92%) (difference not significant). The level of the disease-free survival curve at longest follow-up is 65% for MOPP-treated patients and 72% for MOPP/CABS-treated patients (difference not significant). The overall survival at 12 years is projected at 68% for MOPP-treated patients and 54% for MOPP/CABS-treated patients (difference not significant). Thus, there were no significant differences in efficacy between MOPP and MOPP/CABS. However, MOPP/CABS was more emetogenic than MOPP, and four MOPP/CABS-treated patients went on to develop secondary acute leukemia. No MOPP-treated patients developed leukemia. High initial erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and high platelet counts adversely affected treatment outcome. MOPP-treated patients who received greater than 81% of the projected dose intensity of vincristine over the first three cycles had significantly improved disease-free survival rates over those receiving less than 81%. MOPP/CABS-treated patients who received greater than 82% of the projected dose intensity of vincristine had significantly better overall survival than those who received less than 82%. Disease-free survival on both arms was significantly better in patients who received greater than 84% of the projected dose intensity of all agents. The effect of dose intensity was particularly apparent in patients with poor prognostic factors where those who received greater than 84% of the projected dose intensity of all agents had significantly improved disease-free and overall survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1712836     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1991.9.8.1409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  6 in total

1.  90Y-daclizumab, an anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody, provided responses in 50% of patients with relapsed Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  John E Janik; John C Morris; Deirdre O'Mahony; Stefania Pittaluga; Elaine S Jaffe; Christophe E Redon; William M Bonner; Martin W Brechbiel; Chang H Paik; Millie Whatley; Clara Chen; Jae-Ho Lee; Thomas A Fleisher; Maggie Brown; Jeffrey D White; Donn M Stewart; Suzanne Fioravanti; Cathryn C Lee; Carolyn K Goldman; Bonita R Bryant; Richard P Junghans; Jorge A Carrasquillo; Tat'Yana Worthy; Erin Corcoran; Kevin C Conlon; Thomas A Waldmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  90Y-Daclizumab (Anti-CD25), High-Dose Carmustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, and Melphalan Chemotherapy and Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Yielded Sustained Complete Remissions in 4 Patients with Recurrent Hodgkin's Lymphoma.

Authors:  Kevin C Conlon; Claude Sportes; Martin W Brechbiel; Daniel H Fowler; Ronald Gress; Milos D Miljkovic; Clara C Chen; Millie A Whatley; Bonita R Bryant; Erin M Corcoran; Karen A Kurdziel; Stefania Pittaluga; Chang H Paik; Jae Ho Lee; Thomas A Fleisher; Jorge A Carrasquillo; Thomas A Waldmann
Journal:  Cancer Biother Radiopharm       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.099

3.  Treatment of Hodgkin's disease: a twenty-year follow-up of patients at a center in Korea.

Authors:  June-Won Cheong; Soo Young Park; Jae Kyung Roh; Chang Ok Suh; Jee Sook Hahn
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 2.759

4.  Dose-adjusted EPOCH-rituximab therapy in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Kieron Dunleavy; Stefania Pittaluga; Lauren S Maeda; Ranjana Advani; Clara C Chen; Julie Hessler; Seth M Steinberg; Cliona Grant; George Wright; Gaurav Varma; Louis M Staudt; Elaine S Jaffe; Wyndham H Wilson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  CMF vs alternating CMF/EV in the adjuvant treatment of operable breast cancer. A single centre randomised clinical trial (Naples GUN-3 study).

Authors:  S De Placido; F Perrone; C Carlomagno; A Morabito; C Pagliarulo; R Lauria; A Marinelli; M De Laurentiis; E Varriale; G Petrella
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  ChlVPP alternating with PABlOE is superior to PABlOE alone in the initial treatment of advanced Hodgkin's disease: results of a British National Lymphoma Investigation/Central Lymphoma Group randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  B W Hancock; W M Gregory; M H Cullen; G V Hudson; A Burton; P Selby; K A Maclennan; A Jack; E M Bessell; P Smith; D C Linch
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-05-18       Impact factor: 7.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.