Kevin C Conlon1, Claude Sportes2, Martin W Brechbiel3, Daniel H Fowler2, Ronald Gress2, Milos D Miljkovic1, Clara C Chen4, Millie A Whatley4, Bonita R Bryant1, Erin M Corcoran1, Karen A Kurdziel5, Stefania Pittaluga6, Chang H Paik5, Jae Ho Lee5, Thomas A Fleisher7, Jorge A Carrasquillo4, Thomas A Waldmann1. 1. Lymphoid Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. 2. Experimental Transplantation and Immunology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. 3. Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. 4. Nuclear Medicine Department, Radiation and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. 5. Molecular Imaging Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. 6. Laboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. 7. Department of Laboratory Medicine, NIH Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Abstract
Background: Despite advances in therapy of Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL), a proportion of patients will not respond or relapse. The authors had previously identified CD25, IL-2Rα, as a target for systemic radioimmunotherapy of HL since most normal cells do not express CD25, but it is expressed by a minority of Hodgkin/Reed-Sternberg (HRS) cells and most Tregs rosetting around HRS cells. Study Design and Treatment: This was a single institution, nonrandomized, open-label phase I/II trial of radiolabeled 90Y-daclizumab, an anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody, BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan) conditioning treatment followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (ASCT). Four patients with refractory and relapsed HL were treated in this trial with 3 patients receiving a single dose of 564.6-574.6 MBq 90Y-daclizumab and the fourth patient receiving two doses of 580.9-566.1 MBq 90Y-daclizumab followed by high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT. Results: All 4 evaluable patients treated with 90Y-daclizumab obtained complete responses (CRs) that are ongoing 4.5-7 years following their stem cell transplant. The spectrum and severity of adverse events were mild and more importantly none of the patients, including several with multiple therapies before this treatment, developed the myelodysplastic syndrome. Discussion: Targeting by daclizumab was not directed primarily at tumor cells, but rather the nonmalignant CD25-expressing T cells adjacent to the HRS cells and 90Y-daclizumab provided strong enough β emissions to kill CD25-negative tumor cells at a distance by a crossfire effect. Furthermore, the strong β irradiation killed normal cells in the tumor microenvironment. Conclusions: 90Y-daclizumab (anti-CD25), high-dose BEAM chemotherapy and ASCT was well tolerated and yielded sustained complete remissions in all 4 patients with recurrent HL patients who completed their treatment. Significance: Despite advances, a proportion of patients with HL will not have a CR to their initial treatment, and some with CRs will relapse. They demonstrated that the addition of 90Y-daclizumab into the preconditioning regimen for refractory and relapsed HL patients with high-dose BEAM chemotherapy and ASCT provided sustained CRs in the 4 patients studied. Two of these patients were highly refractory to multiple prior treatments with bulky disease at entry into this study, including 1 patient who never entered a remission and had failed 6 different therapeutic regimens. Despite the small number of patients treated in this study, the sustained clinical benefit in these patients indicates a highly effective treatment. The daclizumab was directed primarily not at HRS cells themselves but toward nonmalignant T cells rosetting around malignant cells. 90Y provided strong β emissions that killed antigen nonexpressing tumor cells at a distance by a crossfire effect. Furthermore, the strong β radiation killed normal cells in the tumor microenvironment that nurtured the malignant cells in the lymphomatous mass. The present study supports expanded analysis of 90Y-daclizumab as part of the regimen of ASCT in patients with refractory and relapsed HL.
Background: Despite advances in therapy of Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL), a proportion of patients will not respond or relapse. The authors had previously identified CD25, IL-2Rα, as a target for systemic radioimmunotherapy of HL since most normal cells do not express CD25, but it is expressed by a minority of Hodgkin/Reed-Sternberg (HRS) cells and most Tregs rosetting around HRS cells. Study Design and Treatment: This was a single institution, nonrandomized, open-label phase I/II trial of radiolabeled 90Y-daclizumab, an anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody, BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan) conditioning treatment followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (ASCT). Four patients with refractory and relapsed HL were treated in this trial with 3 patients receiving a single dose of 564.6-574.6 MBq 90Y-daclizumab and the fourth patient receiving two doses of 580.9-566.1 MBq 90Y-daclizumab followed by high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT. Results: All 4 evaluable patients treated with 90Y-daclizumab obtained complete responses (CRs) that are ongoing 4.5-7 years following their stem cell transplant. The spectrum and severity of adverse events were mild and more importantly none of the patients, including several with multiple therapies before this treatment, developed the myelodysplastic syndrome. Discussion: Targeting by daclizumab was not directed primarily at tumor cells, but rather the nonmalignant CD25-expressing T cells adjacent to the HRS cells and 90Y-daclizumab provided strong enough β emissions to kill CD25-negative tumor cells at a distance by a crossfire effect. Furthermore, the strong β irradiation killed normal cells in the tumor microenvironment. Conclusions: 90Y-daclizumab (anti-CD25), high-dose BEAM chemotherapy and ASCT was well tolerated and yielded sustained complete remissions in all 4 patients with recurrent HLpatients who completed their treatment. Significance: Despite advances, a proportion of patients with HL will not have a CR to their initial treatment, and some with CRs will relapse. They demonstrated that the addition of 90Y-daclizumab into the preconditioning regimen for refractory and relapsed HLpatients with high-dose BEAM chemotherapy and ASCT provided sustained CRs in the 4 patients studied. Two of these patients were highly refractory to multiple prior treatments with bulky disease at entry into this study, including 1 patient who never entered a remission and had failed 6 different therapeutic regimens. Despite the small number of patients treated in this study, the sustained clinical benefit in these patients indicates a highly effective treatment. The daclizumab was directed primarily not at HRS cells themselves but toward nonmalignant T cells rosetting around malignant cells. 90Y provided strong β emissions that killed antigen nonexpressing tumor cells at a distance by a crossfire effect. Furthermore, the strong β radiation killed normal cells in the tumor microenvironment that nurtured the malignant cells in the lymphomatous mass. The present study supports expanded analysis of 90Y-daclizumab as part of the regimen of ASCT in patients with refractory and relapsed HL.
Authors: H M Vriesendorp; J M Herpst; M A Germack; J L Klein; P K Leichner; D M Loudenslager; S E Order Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1991-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: A Sureda; M Constans; A Iriondo; R Arranz; M D Caballero; M J Vidal; J Petit; A López; J J Lahuerta; E Carreras; J García-Conde; J García-Laraña; R Cabrera; I Jarque; D Carrera; J C García-Ruiz; M J Pascual; J Rifón; J M Moraleda; K Pérez-Equiza; C Albó; J Díaz-Mediavilla; A Torres; P Torres; J Besalduch; J Marín; M V Mateos; J M Fernández-Rañada; J Sierra; E Conde Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2005-02-28 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Anas Younes; Nancy L Bartlett; John P Leonard; Dana A Kennedy; Carmel M Lynch; Eric L Sievers; Andres Forero-Torres Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-11-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: C H Moskowitz; S D Nimer; A D Zelenetz; T Trippett; E E Hedrick; D A Filippa; D Louie; M Gonzales; J Walits; N Coady-Lyons; J Qin; R Frank; J R Bertino; A Goy; A Noy; J P O'Brien; D Straus; C S Portlock; J Yahalom Journal: Blood Date: 2001-02-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Michael R Green; Stefano Monti; Scott J Rodig; Przemyslaw Juszczynski; Treeve Currie; Evan O'Donnell; Bjoern Chapuy; Kunihiko Takeyama; Donna Neuberg; Todd R Golub; Jeffery L Kutok; Margaret A Shipp Journal: Blood Date: 2010-07-13 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: F Vincenti; R Kirkman; S Light; G Bumgardner; M Pescovitz; P Halloran; J Neylan; A Wilkinson; H Ekberg; R Gaston; L Backman; J Burdick Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1998-01-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: T A Waldmann; J D White; J A Carrasquillo; J C Reynolds; C H Paik; O A Gansow; M W Brechbiel; E S Jaffe; T A Fleisher; C K Goldman; L E Top; R Bamford; E Zaknoen; E Roessler; C Kasten-Sportes; R England; H Litou; J A Johnson; T Jackson-White; A Manns; B Hanchard; R P Junghans; D L Nelson Journal: Blood Date: 1995-12-01 Impact factor: 22.113