Literature DB >> 17126467

Comparative developmental toxicity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in the hamster, rat and guinea pig.

Kevin M Kransler1, Barbara P McGarrigle, James R Olson.   

Abstract

2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) is a persistent environmental contaminant capable of causing a wide variety of adverse health effects including teratogenesis and altered development. The objective of this study was to compare the developmental toxicity of TCDD in the hamster, rat and guinea pig, which in mature animals exhibit a relatively low, medium and high sensitivity to TCDD, respectively. A single oral dose of TCDD was administered to pregnant rats (0, 1.5, 3.0, 6.0 or 18.0microg/kg) on gestation day 10, pregnant hamsters (0, 1.5, 3.0, 6.0 or 18.0microg/kg) on gestation day 9 and pregnant guinea pigs (0, 0.15 or 1.5microg/kg) on gestation day 14 with fetal analysis on gestation day 20, 15 and 56, respectively. The developmental toxicity of TCDD in the three species included increased fetal mortality, alterations to fetal body weight, body length, organ weight and significant changes to the fetal white blood cell differential counts. Additionally, teratogenic responses were observed in the hamster and rat consisting of cleft palate, kidney congestion, hydronephrosis and intestinal hemorrhaging. Furthermore, the results from this study demonstrate that despite the up to 5000-fold interspecies variability to the acute lethal potency of TCDD observed in mature guinea pigs, rats and hamsters, the developing fetus is uniquely vulnerable to gestational TCDD exposure and displays approximately a 10-fold variability in fetal lethal potency in these species. Together, these results will assist efforts to reduce the uncertainty in the risk assessment for TCDD in sensitive populations, such as the developing embryo and fetus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17126467     DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2006.10.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicology        ISSN: 0300-483X            Impact factor:   4.221


  10 in total

1.  Liver tumor promotion by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin is dependent on the aryl hydrocarbon receptor and TNF/IL-1 receptors.

Authors:  Gregory D Kennedy; Manabu Nukaya; Susan M Moran; Edward Glover; Samuel Weinberg; Silvia Balbo; Stephen S Hecht; Henry C Pitot; Norman R Drinkwater; Christopher A Bradfield
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Transgenic Humanized AHR Mouse Reveals Differences between Human and Mouse AHR Ligand Selectivity.

Authors:  Colin A Flaveny; Gary H Perdew
Journal:  Mol Cell Pharmacol       Date:  2009-01-01

Review 3.  Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR)-mediated signaling as a critical regulator of skeletal cell biology.

Authors:  Dima W Alhamad; Husam Bensreti; Jennifer Dorn; William D Hill; Mark W Hamrick; Meghan E McGee-Lawrence
Journal:  J Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 4.869

4.  Early dioxin exposure causes toxic effects in adult zebrafish.

Authors:  Tracie R Baker; Richard E Peterson; Warren Heideman
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Windows of Sensitivity to Toxic Chemicals in the Development of Cleft Palates.

Authors:  M C Buser; H R Pohl
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 6.393

6.  Compendium of TCDD-mediated transcriptomic response datasets in mammalian model systems.

Authors:  Stephenie D Prokopec; Kathleen E Houlahan; Ren X Sun; John D Watson; Cindy Q Yao; Jamie Lee; Christine P'ng; Renee Pang; Alexander H Wu; Lauren C Chong; Ashley B Smith; Nicholas J Harding; Ivy D Moffat; Jere Lindén; Sanna Lensu; Allan B Okey; Raimo Pohjanvirta; Paul C Boutros
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 7.  Mechanisms of Developmental Toxicity of Dioxins and Related Compounds.

Authors:  Wataru Yoshioka; Chiharu Tohyama
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor and Dioxin-Related Health Hazards-Lessons from Yusho.

Authors:  Masutaka Furue; Yuji Ishii; Kiyomi Tsukimori; Gaku Tsuji
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Evaluation of Placentation and the Role of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Pathway in a Rat Model of Dioxin Exposure.

Authors:  Khursheed Iqbal; Stephen H Pierce; Keisuke Kozai; Pramod Dhakal; Regan L Scott; Katherine F Roby; Carrie A Vyhlidal; Michael J Soares
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Species-Specific Differences in Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Responses: How and Why?

Authors:  Xiaoting Xu; Xi Zhang; Yuzhu Yuan; Yongrui Zhao; Hamza M Fares; Mengjiao Yang; Qing Wen; Reham Taha; Lixin Sun
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 5.923

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.