OBJECTIVES: To characterise the natural history of metastatic prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients followed expectantly for rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (noncastrate metastases). METHODS: Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to assess predictors of survival among 95 patients who developed clinically detectable noncastrate metastases after RP. The initial metastatic phenotype was characterised as minimal (nodal or axial skeletal involvement) or extensive (appendicular skeletal involvement or visceral metastases). Estimates of survival after diagnosis of metastases were generated with the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Median disease-specific survival from diagnosis of noncastrate metastases was 6.6 yr (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.2, 7.9). The initial site of metastatic disease was bone, lymph node, and viscera in 63%, 36%, and 6% of patients, respectively. Thirteen patients (14%) had extensive disease at their first metastatic manifestation. Longer PSA doubling time in the rising PSA state (hazard ratio [HR] 0.8 for each month increase in doubling time; 95%CI, 0.67-0.94) and the initial metastatic phenotype (HR 0.3 for minimal vs. extensive disease; 95%CI, 0.1-0.6) were associated with improved survival. The prostatectomy Gleason score, lymph node status at RP, PSA level at diagnosis of metastases, and interval from surgery to diagnosis of metastases did not correlate with outcome. CONCLUSION: Men who develop noncastrate metastases after RP may have a durable survival. Favourable prognostic indicators include longer PSA doubling time preceding diagnosis of metastases and initial involvement of axial skeleton or lymph nodes.
OBJECTIVES: To characterise the natural history of metastatic prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients followed expectantly for rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (noncastrate metastases). METHODS: Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to assess predictors of survival among 95 patients who developed clinically detectable noncastrate metastases after RP. The initial metastatic phenotype was characterised as minimal (nodal or axial skeletal involvement) or extensive (appendicular skeletal involvement or visceral metastases). Estimates of survival after diagnosis of metastases were generated with the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Median disease-specific survival from diagnosis of noncastrate metastases was 6.6 yr (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.2, 7.9). The initial site of metastatic disease was bone, lymph node, and viscera in 63%, 36%, and 6% of patients, respectively. Thirteen patients (14%) had extensive disease at their first metastatic manifestation. Longer PSA doubling time in the rising PSA state (hazard ratio [HR] 0.8 for each month increase in doubling time; 95%CI, 0.67-0.94) and the initial metastatic phenotype (HR 0.3 for minimal vs. extensive disease; 95%CI, 0.1-0.6) were associated with improved survival. The prostatectomy Gleason score, lymph node status at RP, PSA level at diagnosis of metastases, and interval from surgery to diagnosis of metastases did not correlate with outcome. CONCLUSION:Men who develop noncastrate metastases after RP may have a durable survival. Favourable prognostic indicators include longer PSA doubling time preceding diagnosis of metastases and initial involvement of axial skeleton or lymph nodes.
Authors: Alexandra J Stewart; Howard I Scher; Ming-Hui Chen; David G McLeod; Peter R Carroll; Judd W Moul; Anthony V D'Amico Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-09-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Mark S Soloway; Kapil Pareek; Rooholiah Sharifi; Zev Wajsman; David McLeod; David P Wood; Antonio Puras-Baez Journal: J Urol Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Michel Bolla; Laurence Collette; Léo Blank; Padraig Warde; Jean Bernard Dubois; René-Olivier Mirimanoff; Guy Storme; Jacques Bernier; Abraham Kuten; Cora Sternberg; Johan Mattelaer; José Lopez Torecilla; J Rafael Pfeffer; Carmel Lino Cutajar; Alfredo Zurlo; Marianne Pierart Journal: Lancet Date: 2002-07-13 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Anthony V D'Amico; Judd Moul; Peter R Carroll; Leon Sun; Deborah Lubeck; Ming-Hui Chen Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-06-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Judd W Moul; Hongyu Wu; Leon Sun; David G McLeod; Christopher Amling; Timothy Donahue; Leo Kusuda; Wade Sexton; Keith O'Reilly; Javier Hernandez; Andrew Chung; Douglas Soderdahl Journal: J Urol Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: D Andrew Loblaw; David S Mendelson; James A Talcott; Katherine S Virgo; Mark R Somerfield; Edgar Ben-Josef; Richard Middleton; Henry Porterfield; Stewart A Sharp; Thomas J Smith; Mary Ellen Taplin; Nicholas J Vogelzang; James L Wade; Charles L Bennett; Howard I Scher Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-06-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Anthony V D'Amico; Judd W Moul; Peter R Carroll; Leon Sun; Deborah Lubeck; Ming-Hui Chen Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2003-09-17 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Catherine M Tangen; James R Faulkner; E David Crawford; Ian M Thompson; Daisaku Hirano; Mario Eisenberger; Maha Hussain Journal: Clin Prostate Cancer Date: 2003-06
Authors: Antonino Battaglia; Gaëtan Devos; Karel Decaestecker; Manuel Witters; Lisa Moris; Thomas Van den Broeck; Charlien Berghen; Wouter Everaerts; Maarten Albersen; Arman Tsaturyan; Gert De Meerleer; Hein Van Poppel; Karolien Goffin; Piet Ost; Lorenzo Tosco; Steven Joniau Journal: World J Urol Date: 2019-03-12 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Chao Xie; Edward M Schwarz; Erik R Sampson; Robinder S Dhillon; Dan Li; Regis J O'Keefe; Wakenda Tyler Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2011-08-01 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: M Picchio; P Mapelli; V Panebianco; P Castellucci; E Incerti; A Briganti; G Gandaglia; M Kirienko; F Barchetti; C Nanni; F Montorsi; L Gianolli; S Fanti Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-01-17 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: M Picchio; G Berardi; A Fodor; E Busnardo; C Crivellaro; G Giovacchini; C Fiorino; M Kirienko; E Incerti; C Messa; L Gianolli; N Di Muzio Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2014-03-06 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Rubén Algarra; Mateo Hevia; Antonio Tienza; Imanol Merino; José María Velis; Javier Zudaire; José Enrique Robles; Ignacio Pascual Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Howard I Scher; Susan Halabi; Ian Tannock; Michael Morris; Cora N Sternberg; Michael A Carducci; Mario A Eisenberger; Celestia Higano; Glenn J Bubley; Robert Dreicer; Daniel Petrylak; Philip Kantoff; Ethan Basch; William Kevin Kelly; William D Figg; Eric J Small; Tomasz M Beer; George Wilding; Alison Martin; Maha Hussain Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Weranja K B Ranasinghe; Lin Xiao; Suzana Kovac; Mike Chang; Carine Michiels; Damien Bolton; Arthur Shulkes; Graham S Baldwin; Oneel Patel Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-01-16 Impact factor: 3.240