Literature DB >> 17125474

Nephroureterectomy for treating upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma: Time to change the treatment paradigm?

Gordon A Brown1, J Erik Busby, Christopher G Wood, Louis L Pisters, Colin P N Dinney, David A Swanson, H Barton Grossman, Curtis A Pettaway, Mark F Munsell, Ashish M Kamat, Surena F Matin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate factors associated with disease recurrence and survival in patients undergoing nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma (UUT-TCC) in one centre over an 18-year period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records of patients who had a nephroureterectomy for UUT-TCC at our institution from 1986 to 2004 were reviewed for clinical, pathological and treatment period data. Cox's proportional hazards regression model was used to test the statistical significance of several potential prognostic factors for recurrence and survival. RESULTS The median overall duration of follow-up was 2.5 years for 184 patients. Significant prognosticators for disease-specific survival (DSS) by univariate analysis were tumour stage (P < 0.01), tumour grade (P < 0.01), node-positive disease (P < 0.01), multifocality (P = 0.03), previous cystectomy (P < 0.01) and synchronous bilateral UUT-TCC (P = 0.02). On multivariate analysis, only tumour stage (P = 0.03) and grade (P = 0.01) correlated with DSS. The median recurrence-free survival duration was 2.4 years. In 44 patients, the disease recurred outside the bladder; 15 (8.2%) had local recurrence, 20 (10.9%) distant metastasis, and nine (4.9%) both local and distant recurrence. Bladder tumours occurred in 40 (26.1%) patients with no previous cystectomy. The evaluation of treatment outcome during three periods of the study showed no significant effect on DSS.
CONCLUSION: Tumour stage and grade correlated with DSS in this cohort, with no improvement in outcome over the 18-year period assessed. Patients with high-stage and high-grade disease continue to fare poorly, suggesting a need for changing the treatment protocol. Judiciously applying a multimodal approach to the management of high-risk patients by incorporating neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgical resection might provide, for the first time, the opportunity to improve patient outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17125474     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06524.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  28 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic factors and predictive tools for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review.

Authors:  Aurélie Mbeutcha; Morgan Rouprêt; Ashish M Kamat; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Giacomo Novara; Jay D Raman; Christian Seitz; Evanguelos Xylinas; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves survival of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Sima Porten; Arlene O Siefker-Radtke; Lianchun Xiao; Vitaly Margulis; Ashish M Kamat; Christopher G Wood; Eric Jonasch; Colin P N Dinney; Surena F Matin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  Oncologic outcomes obtained after neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of urothelial carcinomas of the upper urinary tract: a review.

Authors:  Jan Cordier; Guru Sonpavde; Christian G Stief; Derya Tilki
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Upper tract urothelial carcinoma: impact of time to surgery.

Authors:  Debasish Sundi; Robert S Svatek; Vitaly Margulis; Christopher G Wood; Surena F Matin; Colin P Dinney; Ashish M Kamat
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 3.498

5.  Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy and regional lymphadenectomy in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  M Zak Rajput; Ashish M Kamat; Jonathan Clavell-Hernandez; Arlene O Siefker-Radtke; H Barton Grossman; Colin P N Dinney; Surena F Matin
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 6.  The role of extensive lymphadenectomy in upper tract malignant disease.

Authors:  Travis Pagliara; Andrew Nguyen; Badrinath Konety
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Urinary cytology with acridine orange fluorescence is highly valuable for predicting high-grade upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Jing Li; Zhihong Zhang; Jin Wang; Changwen Zhang; Haibo Li; Yong Xu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-01-15

8.  Apparent diffusion coefficient as a prognostic biomarker of upper urinary tract cancer: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Soichiro Yoshida; Shuichiro Kobayashi; Fumitaka Koga; Junichiro Ishioka; Chikako Ishii; Hiroshi Tanaka; Yasukazu Nakanishi; Yoh Matsuoka; Noboru Numao; Kazutaka Saito; Hitoshi Masuda; Yasuhisa Fujii; Kazunori Kihara
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Comprehensive management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Georgios Koukourakis; Georgios Zacharias; Michael Koukourakis; Kiriaki Pistevou-Gobaki; Christos Papaloukas; Athanasios Kostakopoulos; Vassilios Kouloulias
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2008-12-10

10.  Retroperitoneal lymph nodes in transitional cell carcinoma of the kidney and ureter.

Authors:  Shilajit D Kundu; Scott E Eggener
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2009-01-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.