BACKGROUND: Several different types of needles for transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) exist in the market. Recently, the eXcelon transbronchial needle (Boston Scientific, Boston, Mass., USA) was commercialized, and to our knowledge, no comparative studies with other types of needles have been performed up to date. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to determine the diagnostic yield and safety of the 21-gauge eXcelon transbronchial needle in the diagnosis of mediastinal lesions and to compare it with a 22-gauge Wang cytology needle (Bard-Wang, Billerica, Mass., USA). METHODS: A case-control prospective study was conducted. The study group included 42 TBNA of mediastinal nodes performed in 35 patients with the eXcelon 21-gauge needle from January to June 2005. A control group included 110 TBNA carried out in 99 patients that underwent mediastinal lymph node sampling using a MW-122 needle from June 2002 to December 2004. RESULTS: There was no statistical differentiation in the characteristics of the disease, mediastinal lymph nodes or number of passes between cases and controls. Adequate samples were obtained in 30 (71.4%) cases and 81 (73.6%) controls (p = 0.8). Technical complications occurred in 7 (16.6%) cases and 14 (12.7%) controls (p = 0.7). The only clinical complication was bleeding presented in 2 (4.8%) cases and 3 (2.7%) controls (p = 0.3). CONCLUSION: The eXcelon 21-gauge transbronchial needle is as effective and safe as the MW-122 needle in the diagnosis of mediastinal lymph node enlargement.
BACKGROUND: Several different types of needles for transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) exist in the market. Recently, the eXcelon transbronchial needle (Boston Scientific, Boston, Mass., USA) was commercialized, and to our knowledge, no comparative studies with other types of needles have been performed up to date. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to determine the diagnostic yield and safety of the 21-gauge eXcelon transbronchial needle in the diagnosis of mediastinal lesions and to compare it with a 22-gauge Wang cytology needle (Bard-Wang, Billerica, Mass., USA). METHODS: A case-control prospective study was conducted. The study group included 42 TBNA of mediastinal nodes performed in 35 patients with the eXcelon 21-gauge needle from January to June 2005. A control group included 110 TBNA carried out in 99 patients that underwent mediastinal lymph node sampling using a MW-122 needle from June 2002 to December 2004. RESULTS: There was no statistical differentiation in the characteristics of the disease, mediastinal lymph nodes or number of passes between cases and controls. Adequate samples were obtained in 30 (71.4%) cases and 81 (73.6%) controls (p = 0.8). Technical complications occurred in 7 (16.6%) cases and 14 (12.7%) controls (p = 0.7). The only clinical complication was bleeding presented in 2 (4.8%) cases and 3 (2.7%) controls (p = 0.3). CONCLUSION: The eXcelon 21-gauge transbronchial needle is as effective and safe as the MW-122 needle in the diagnosis of mediastinal lymph node enlargement.
Authors: Alberto Fernández-Villar; Maribel Botana; Virginia Leiro; Ana González; Cristina Represas; Alberto Ruano-Raviña Journal: BMC Pulm Med Date: 2010-04-28 Impact factor: 3.317