OBJECTIVE: To clarify whether middle segmental pancreatic resection can be performed with comparable morbidity and mortality to classic pancreatic resections for lesions in the mid-portion of the pancreas. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Pancreaticoduodenectomies or distal pancreatectomy, traditionally used to treat lesions of the pancreatic body, sacrifice a significant amount of normal pancreatic tissue. Middle segmental pancreatic resection has therefore been introduced to minimize loss of functioning pancreatic tissue. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective 4-year single-center study, 40 consecutive patients with lesions of the neck or the body of the pancreas underwent a middle segmental pancreatic resection. A matched-pairs analysis comparing middle segmental pancreatic resection with pp-Whipple and distal pancreatectomy was included. RESULTS: Seventeen patients had neoplastic lesions (4 solid malignancies, 9 cystic lesions, 4 neuroendocrine tumors) and 23 patients had focal chronic pancreatitis. Postoperative surgical morbidity was 27.5% and mortality 2.5%. The reoperation rate was 5.0%. Three patients (7.5%) developed pancreatic fistula. Median postoperative hospital stay was 11 days (range, 6-62 days). After a median follow-up of 29 months, 97.4% (38 patients) of the patients were satisfied with the operation. The mean quality of life status (EORTC QLQ-C30) was comparable to a normal control population. Matched-pairs analysis revealed no differences of perioperative parameters (except operation time), morbidity, and mortality. However, endocrine pancreatic function was better preserved (P < 0.05) in patients with middle segmental pancreatic resection. CONCLUSIONS: Middle segmental pancreatic resection is an appropriate procedure for selected patients with tumorous lesions in the mid-portion of the pancreas. It preserves pancreatic parenchyma and function and has a mortality and morbidity rate comparable to other pancreatic resection procedures.
OBJECTIVE: To clarify whether middle segmental pancreatic resection can be performed with comparable morbidity and mortality to classic pancreatic resections for lesions in the mid-portion of the pancreas. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Pancreaticoduodenectomies or distal pancreatectomy, traditionally used to treat lesions of the pancreatic body, sacrifice a significant amount of normal pancreatic tissue. Middle segmental pancreatic resection has therefore been introduced to minimize loss of functioning pancreatic tissue. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective 4-year single-center study, 40 consecutive patients with lesions of the neck or the body of the pancreas underwent a middle segmental pancreatic resection. A matched-pairs analysis comparing middle segmental pancreatic resection with pp-Whipple and distal pancreatectomy was included. RESULTS: Seventeen patients had neoplastic lesions (4 solid malignancies, 9 cystic lesions, 4 neuroendocrine tumors) and 23 patients had focal chronic pancreatitis. Postoperative surgical morbidity was 27.5% and mortality 2.5%. The reoperation rate was 5.0%. Three patients (7.5%) developed pancreatic fistula. Median postoperative hospital stay was 11 days (range, 6-62 days). After a median follow-up of 29 months, 97.4% (38 patients) of the patients were satisfied with the operation. The mean quality of life status (EORTC QLQ-C30) was comparable to a normal control population. Matched-pairs analysis revealed no differences of perioperative parameters (except operation time), morbidity, and mortality. However, endocrine pancreatic function was better preserved (P < 0.05) in patients with middle segmental pancreatic resection. CONCLUSIONS:Middle segmental pancreatic resection is an appropriate procedure for selected patients with tumorous lesions in the mid-portion of the pancreas. It preserves pancreatic parenchyma and function and has a mortality and morbidity rate comparable to other pancreatic resection procedures.
Authors: C J Yeo; J L Cameron; M M Maher; P K Sauter; M L Zahurak; M A Talamini; K D Lillemoe; H A Pitt Journal: Ann Surg Date: 1995-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Reto M Käppeli; Sascha A Müller; Bianka Hummel; Christina Kruse; Philip Müller; Jürgen Fornaro; Alexander Wilhelm; Marcel Zadnikar; Bruno M Schmied; Ignazio Tarantino Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2013-09-03 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Harish Lavu; Jamie L Knuth; Marshall S Baker; Changyu Shen; Nicholas J Zyromski; Max Schmidt; Atilla Nakeeb; Thomas J Howard Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2008 Impact factor: 3.647