BACKGROUND: Because information on the optimal dose of midazolam for sedation of nonventilated infants after major surgery is scant, a population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model is developed for this specific group. METHODS:Twenty-four of the 53 evaluated infants (aged 3-24 months) admitted to the Pediatric Surgery Intensive Care Unit, who required sedation judged necessary on the basis of the COMFORT-Behavior score and were randomly assigned to receive midazolam, were included in the analysis. Bispectral Index values were recorded concordantly. Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling was performed using NONMEM V (GloboMax LLC, Hanover, MD). RESULTS: For midazolam, total clearance was 0.157 l/min, central volume was 3.8 l, peripheral volume was 30.2 l, and intercompartmental clearance was 0.30 l/min. Assuming 60% conversion of midazolam to 1-OH-midazolam, the volume of distribution for 1-OH-midazolam and 1-OH-midazolamglucuronide was 6.7 and 1.7 l, and clearance was 0.21 and 0.047 l/min, respectively. Depth of sedation using COMFORT-Behavior could adequately be described by a baseline, postanesthesia effect (Emax model) and midazolam effect (Emax model).The midazolam concentration at half maximum effect was 0.58 mum with a high interindividual variability of 89%. Using the Bispectral Index, in 57% of the infants the effect of midazolam could not be characterized. CONCLUSION: In nonventilated infants after major surgery, midazolam clearance is two to five times higher than in ventilated children. From the model presented, the recommended initial dosage is a loading dose of 1 mg followed by a continuous infusion of 0.5 mg/h during the night for a COMFORT-Behavior of 12-14 in infants aged 1 yr. Large interindividual variability warrants individual titration of midazolam in these children.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Because information on the optimal dose of midazolam for sedation of nonventilated infants after major surgery is scant, a population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model is developed for this specific group. METHODS: Twenty-four of the 53 evaluated infants (aged 3-24 months) admitted to the Pediatric Surgery Intensive Care Unit, who required sedation judged necessary on the basis of the COMFORT-Behavior score and were randomly assigned to receive midazolam, were included in the analysis. Bispectral Index values were recorded concordantly. Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling was performed using NONMEM V (GloboMax LLC, Hanover, MD). RESULTS: For midazolam, total clearance was 0.157 l/min, central volume was 3.8 l, peripheral volume was 30.2 l, and intercompartmental clearance was 0.30 l/min. Assuming 60% conversion of midazolam to 1-OH-midazolam, the volume of distribution for 1-OH-midazolam and 1-OH-midazolamglucuronide was 6.7 and 1.7 l, and clearance was 0.21 and 0.047 l/min, respectively. Depth of sedation using COMFORT-Behavior could adequately be described by a baseline, postanesthesia effect (Emax model) and midazolam effect (Emax model).The midazolam concentration at half maximum effect was 0.58 mum with a high interindividual variability of 89%. Using the Bispectral Index, in 57% of the infants the effect of midazolam could not be characterized. CONCLUSION: In nonventilated infants after major surgery, midazolam clearance is two to five times higher than in ventilated children. From the model presented, the recommended initial dosage is a loading dose of 1 mg followed by a continuous infusion of 0.5 mg/h during the night for a COMFORT-Behavior of 12-14 in infants aged 1 yr. Large interindividual variability warrants individual titration of midazolam in these children.
Authors: Alexander A Vinks; Nieko C Punt; Frank Menke; Eric Kirkendall; Dawn Butler; Thomas J Duggan; DonnaMaria E Cortezzo; Sam Kiger; Tom Dietrich; Paul Spencer; Rob Keefer; Kenneth D R Setchell; Junfang Zhao; Joshua C Euteneuer; Tomoyuki Mizuno; Kevin R Dufendach Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2019-12-11 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Marion Bouillon-Pichault; Vincent Jullien; Caroline Bazzoli; Gérard Pons; Michel Tod Journal: J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn Date: 2010-11-04 Impact factor: 2.745
Authors: Roosmarijn F W De Cock; Chiara Piana; Elke H J Krekels; Meindert Danhof; Karel Allegaert; Catherijne A J Knibbe Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2010-03-26 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Maurice J Ahsman; Manon Hanekamp; Enno D Wildschut; Dick Tibboel; Ron A A Mathot Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Urshulaa Dholakia; Reza Seddighi; Adesola Odunayo; Sherry K Cox; Elizabeth H Jones; Bruno H Pypendop Journal: Comp Med Date: 2019-06-10 Impact factor: 0.982
Authors: Jeroen Diepstraten; Vidya Chidambaran; Senthilkumar Sadhasivam; Hope R Esslinger; Shareen L Cox; Thomas H Inge; Catherijne A J Knibbe; Alexander A Vinks Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 6.447