Literature DB >> 17120566

Mechanism and elimination of a water vapor interference in the measurement of ozone by UV absorbance.

Kevin L Wilson1, John W Birks.   

Abstract

A water vapor interference in ozone measurements by UV absorption was investigated using four different ozone monitors (TEI models 49 and 49C, Dasibi model 1003-AH, and a 2B Technologies model 202 prototype). In the extreme case of step changes between 0 and 90% relative humidity (RH), a large interference in the range of tens to hundreds of ppbv was found for all instruments tested, with the magnitude and sign depending on the manufacturer and model. Considering that water vapor does not absorb at the wavelength of the Hg lamp (253.7 nm) used in these instruments, another explanation is required. Based on experimental evidence and theoretical considerations, we conclude that the water vapor interference is caused by humidity effects on the transmission of uncollimated UV light through the detection cell. The ozone scrubber acts as a water reservoir, either adding or removing water from the air sample, thereby modulating the detector signal and producing a positive or negative offset. It was found for the 2B Technologies ozone monitor that use of a 1-m length of Nafion tubing just prior to the entrance to the detection cell reduces the water vapor interference to negligible levels (+/- 2 ppbv for step changes between 0 and 90% RH) while quantitatively passing ozone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17120566     DOI: 10.1021/es052590c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  6 in total

1.  Influence of temperature changes on ambient air NOx chemiluminescence measurements.

Authors:  Marta Doval Miñarro; Enrique González Ferradás; Francisco J Marzal Martínez
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Development of a large-scale computer-controlled ozone inhalation exposure system for rodents.

Authors:  Gregory J Smith; Leon Walsh; Mark Higuchi; Samir N P Kelada
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 2.724

3.  Miniature Personal Ozone Monitor Based on UV Absorbance.

Authors:  Peter C Andersen; Craig J Williford; John W Birks
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Comparison of ozone measurement methods in biomass burning smoke: an evaluation under field and laboratory conditions.

Authors:  Russell W Long; Andrew Whitehill; Andrew Habel; Shawn Urbanski; Hannah Halliday; Maribel Colón; Surender Kaushik; Matthew S Landis
Journal:  Atmos Meas Tech       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Real-time ozone detection based on a microfabricated quartz crystal tuning fork sensor.

Authors:  Rui Wang; Francis Tsow; Xuezhi Zhang; Jhih-Hong Peng; Erica S Forzani; Yongsheng Chen; John C Crittenden; Hugo Destaillats; Nongjian Tao
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Effects of Water Removal Devices on Ambient Inorganic Air Pollutant Measurements.

Authors:  Dong-June Kim; Trieu-Vuong Dinh; Joo-Yeon Lee; In-Young Choi; Dong-Jin Son; In-Young Kim; Young Sunwoo; Jo-Chun Kim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.