Literature DB >> 17120104

Atmospheric mercury emissions from polluted gold mining areas (Venezuela).

A García-Sánchez1, F Contreras, M Adams, F Santos.   

Abstract

Soil, waste rock and mud from mercury-gold amalgamation mining areas of El Callao (Venezuela) are highly enriched in Hg (0.5-500 microg g(-1)) relative to natural background concentrations (<0.1 microg g(-1)). Mercury fluxes to the atmosphere from twelve polluted sites of this area were measured in situ (6 a.m. to 8 p.m.) using a Plexiglas flux chamber connected to a portable mercury analyzer (model RA-915+; Lumex, St. Petersburg, Russia). Mercury fluxes ranged between 0.65 and 420.1 microg m(-2) h(-1), and the average flux range during the diurnal hours was 9.1-239.2 microg m(-2) h(-1). These flux values are five orders of magnitude higher than both reported world background Hg fluxes (1-69 ng m(-2) h(-1)) and the regional values, which are in the range 2-10 ng m(-2) h(-1). The flux results obtained in this study are, however, similar to those measured at Hg polluted sites such as chloro-alkali plants or polymetallic ore mining districts (>100,000 ng m(-2) h(-1)). The results from this study also show that Hg emissions from the soil are influenced by solar radiation, soil temperature and soil Hg concentration. Our data suggest that solar radiation may be the dominant factor affecting Hg degrees emission since the major species of mercury in polluted soil is Hg degrees (85-97% of total Hg). The simple release of Hg degrees vapor is probably the dominant process occurring with incident light in the field. The apparent activation energy for mercury emission indicates that the volatilization of mercury mainly occurred as a result of the vaporization of elemental mercury in soil. The degree of Hg emission differed significantly among the soil sites studied, which may be due to variations in soil texture, organic matter content and soil compaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17120104     DOI: 10.1007/s10653-006-9049-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Geochem Health        ISSN: 0269-4042            Impact factor:   4.609


  16 in total

1.  Arctic may be naturally generating reactive gaseous mercury.

Authors:  K S Betts
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Occupational exposure to airborne mercury during gold mining operations near El Callao, Venezuela.

Authors:  P L Drake; M Rojas; C M Reh; C A Mueller; F M Jenkins
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Scaling of atmospheric mercury emissions from three naturally enriched areas: Flowery Peak, Nevada; Peavine Peak, Nevada; and Long Valley Caldera, California.

Authors:  Mark A Engle; Mae Sexauer Gustin
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2002-05-06       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Atmospheric mercury monitoring survey in Beijing, China.

Authors:  Shili Liu; Farhad Nadim; Chris Perkins; Robert J Carley; George E Hoag; Yuhan Lin; Letian Chen
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 7.086

5.  Hair mercury speciation as a function of gender, age, and body mass index in inhabitants of the Negro River basin, Amazon, Brazil.

Authors:  A C Barbosa; W Jardim; J G Dórea; B Fosberg; J Souza
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Atmospheric mercury near a chlor-alkali plant in Sweden.

Authors:  Ingvar Wängberg; Hans Edner; Romano Ferrara; Enrica Lanzillotta; John Munthe; Jonas Sommar; Mikael Sjöholm; Sune Svanberg; Petter Weibring
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2003-03-20       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Some potential errors in the measurement of mercury gas exchange at the soil surface using a dynamic flux chamber.

Authors:  A Gillis; D R Miller
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2000-10-09       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Some local environmental effects on mercury emission and absorption at a soil surface.

Authors:  A A Gillis; D R Miller
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2000-10-09       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  Assessing the contribution of natural sources to regional atmospheric mercury budgets

Authors: 
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2000-10-02       Impact factor: 7.963

10.  Mercury fluxes in a natural forested Amazonian catchment (Serra do Navio, Amapá State, Brazil).

Authors:  A H Fostier; M C Forti; J R Guimarães; A J Melfi; R Boulet; C M Espirito Santo; F J Krug
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2000-10-09       Impact factor: 7.963

View more
  5 in total

1.  Soil surface Hg emission flux in coalfield in Wuda, Inner Mongolia, China.

Authors:  Chunhui Li; Handong Liang; Ming Liang; Yang Chen; Yi Zhou
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Artificial lake expansion amplifies mercury pollution from gold mining.

Authors:  Jacqueline R Gerson; Simon N Topp; Claudia M Vega; John R Gardner; Xiao Yang; Luis E Fernandez; Emily S Bernhardt; Tamlin M Pavelsky
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 14.136

3.  A compilation of field surveys on gaseous elemental mercury (GEM) from contrasting environmental settings in Europe, South America, South Africa and China: separating fads from facts.

Authors:  Pablo Higueras; Roberto Oyarzun; Joze Kotnik; José María Esbrí; Alba Martínez-Coronado; Milena Horvat; Miguel Angel López-Berdonces; Willians Llanos; Orlando Vaselli; Barbara Nisi; Nikolay Mashyanov; Vladimir Ryzov; Zdravko Spiric; Nikolay Panichev; Rob McCrindle; Xinbin Feng; Xuewu Fu; Javier Lillo; Jorge Loredo; María Eugenia García; Pura Alfonso; Karla Villegas; Silvia Palacios; Jorge Oyarzún; Hugo Maturana; Felicia Contreras; Melitón Adams; Sergio Ribeiro-Guevara; Luise Felipe Niecenski; Salvatore Giammanco; Jasna Huremović
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 4.609

4.  Mercury concentrations and distribution in soil, water, mine waste leachates, and air in and around mercury mines in the Big Bend region, Texas, USA.

Authors:  John E Gray; Peter M Theodorakos; David L Fey; David P Krabbenhoft
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2014-06-29       Impact factor: 4.609

5.  Mercuric pollution of surface water, superficial sediments, Nile tilapia (Oreochromis nilotica Linnaeus 1758 [Cichlidae]) and yams (Dioscorea alata) in auriferous areas of Namukombe stream, Syanyonja, Busia, Uganda.

Authors:  Timothy Omara; Shakilah Karungi; Raymond Kalukusu; BrendaVictoria Nakabuye; Sarah Kagoya; Bashir Musau
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 2.984

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.