Literature DB >> 17118861

Concepts underlying outcome measures in studies of consultations in general practice.

Annika Andén1, Sven-Olof Andersson, Carl-Edvard Rudebeck.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To give an overview of the concepts used to describe and evaluate the outcome of general practice consultations.
METHOD: A literature study was undertaken. Among 101 articles relevant to the subject 35 were chosen to illustrate the concepts found. RESULT: The following concepts were found: disease control, patient compliance, efficacy, symptom relief, enablement, general health, and patient satisfaction. The first three concepts encourage objective measurement while the following four concern the patient's subjective assessment. Methods naturally linked to the respective concepts are briefly described. DISCUSSION: The concepts reflect very diverse aspects of general practice. Some of the concepts come from other domains of research, while others have been developed within general practice. Disease is not exclusively in focus. The experience, competence, and life situation of the patient are as well dealt with as they should be in accordance with a patient-centred profession. However, the concepts spring from the researchers' ideas about what is important to patients. The patients' priorities were not sought.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17118861     DOI: 10.1080/02813430600853271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care        ISSN: 0281-3432            Impact factor:   2.581


  9 in total

1.  The Patient Experiences Questionnaire for Out-of-Hours Care (PEQ-OHC): data quality, reliability, and validity.

Authors:  Andrew M Garratt; Kirsten Danielsen; Oddvar Forland; Steinar Hunskaar
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.581

2.  The physician's self-evaluation of the consultation and patient outcome: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Gerd Carlsson Ahlén; Ronny K Gunnarsson
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 2.581

3.  Association between patients' recommendation of their GP and their evaluation of the GP.

Authors:  Peter Vedsted; Hanne N Heje
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.581

4.  Data quality and confirmatory factor analysis of the Danish EUROPEP questionnaire on patient evaluation of general practice.

Authors:  Peter Vedsted; Ineta Sokolowski; Hanne N Heje
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.581

5.  Having a Family Doctor is Associated with Some Better Patient-Reported Outcomes of Primary Care Consultations.

Authors:  Cindy L K Lam; Esther Y T Yu; Yvonne Y C Lo; Carlos K H Wong; Stewart M Mercer; Daniel Y T Fong; Albert Lee; Tai Pong Lam; Gabriel M Leung
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2014-09-15

6.  Patient satisfaction with doctor-patient interaction and its association with modifiable cardiovascular risk factors among moderately-high risk patients in primary healthcare.

Authors:  Mohd Noor Norhayati; Abd Aziz Masseni; Ishak Azlina
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Patient Enablement After a Single Appointment With a GP: Analysis of Finnish QUALICOPC Data.

Authors:  Elina Tolvanen; Tuomas H Koskela; Mika Helminen; Elise Kosunen
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2017-09-15

8.  To make a difference--how GPs conceive consultation outcomes. A phenomenographic study.

Authors:  Annika Andén; Sven-Olof Andersson; Carl-Edvard Rudebeck
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  Coping better with health problems after a visit to the family physician: associations with patients and physicians characteristics.

Authors:  Christine Cohidon; Pascal Wild; Nicolas Senn
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 2.497

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.