| Literature DB >> 17118728 |
Alan R Boobis1, Samuel M Cohen, Vicki Dellarco, Douglas McGregor, M E Bette Meek, Carolyn Vickers, Deborah Willcocks, William Farland.
Abstract
The use of structured frameworks can be invaluable in promoting harmonization in the assessment of chemical risk. IPCS has therefore updated and extended its mode of action (MOA) framework for cancer to address the issue of human relevance of a carcinogenic response observed in an experimental study. The first stage is to determine whether it is possible to establish an MOA. This comprises a series of key events along the causal pathway to cancer, identified using a weight-of-evidence approach based on the Bradford Hill criteria. The key events are then compared first qualitatively and then quantitatively between the experimental animals and humans. Finally, a clear statement of confidence, analysis, and implications is produced. The IPCS human relevance framework for cancer provides an analytical tool to enable the transparent evaluation of the data, identification of key data gaps, and structured presentation of information that would be of value in the further risk assessment of the compound, even if relevancy cannot be excluded. This might include data on the shape of the dose-response curve, identification of any thresholds and recognition of potentially susceptible subgroups, for example, the basis of genetic or life-stage differences.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2006 PMID: 17118728 DOI: 10.1080/10408440600977677
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Crit Rev Toxicol ISSN: 1040-8444 Impact factor: 5.635