Literature DB >> 17118728

IPCS framework for analyzing the relevance of a cancer mode of action for humans.

Alan R Boobis1, Samuel M Cohen, Vicki Dellarco, Douglas McGregor, M E Bette Meek, Carolyn Vickers, Deborah Willcocks, William Farland.   

Abstract

The use of structured frameworks can be invaluable in promoting harmonization in the assessment of chemical risk. IPCS has therefore updated and extended its mode of action (MOA) framework for cancer to address the issue of human relevance of a carcinogenic response observed in an experimental study. The first stage is to determine whether it is possible to establish an MOA. This comprises a series of key events along the causal pathway to cancer, identified using a weight-of-evidence approach based on the Bradford Hill criteria. The key events are then compared first qualitatively and then quantitatively between the experimental animals and humans. Finally, a clear statement of confidence, analysis, and implications is produced. The IPCS human relevance framework for cancer provides an analytical tool to enable the transparent evaluation of the data, identification of key data gaps, and structured presentation of information that would be of value in the further risk assessment of the compound, even if relevancy cannot be excluded. This might include data on the shape of the dose-response curve, identification of any thresholds and recognition of potentially susceptible subgroups, for example, the basis of genetic or life-stage differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17118728     DOI: 10.1080/10408440600977677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol        ISSN: 1040-8444            Impact factor:   5.635


  54 in total

Review 1.  Current understanding of the mechanism of benzene-induced leukemia in humans: implications for risk assessment.

Authors:  Cliona M McHale; Luoping Zhang; Martyn T Smith
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 4.944

2.  Identifying an indoor air exposure limit for formaldehyde considering both irritation and cancer hazards.

Authors:  Robert Golden
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 5.635

3.  Identification and characterization of adverse effects in 21st century toxicology.

Authors:  Douglas A Keller; Daland R Juberg; Natasha Catlin; William H Farland; Frederick G Hess; Douglas C Wolf; Nancy G Doerrer
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  A Set of Six Gene Expression Biomarkers Identify Rat Liver Tumorigens in Short-term Assays.

Authors:  J Christopher Corton; Thomas Hill; Jeffrey J Sutherland; James L Stevens; John Rooney
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Adverse outcome pathway development II: best practices.

Authors:  Daniel L Villeneuve; Doug Crump; Natàlia Garcia-Reyero; Markus Hecker; Thomas H Hutchinson; Carlie A LaLone; Brigitte Landesmann; Teresa Lettieri; Sharon Munn; Malgorzata Nepelska; Mary Ann Ottinger; Lucia Vergauwen; Maurice Whelan
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Adverse outcome pathway (AOP) development I: strategies and principles.

Authors:  Daniel L Villeneuve; Doug Crump; Natàlia Garcia-Reyero; Markus Hecker; Thomas H Hutchinson; Carlie A LaLone; Brigitte Landesmann; Teresa Lettieri; Sharon Munn; Malgorzata Nepelska; Mary Ann Ottinger; Lucia Vergauwen; Maurice Whelan
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Predicting the future: opportunities and challenges for the chemical industry to apply 21st-century toxicity testing.

Authors:  Raja S Settivari; Nicholas Ball; Lynea Murphy; Reza Rasoulpour; Darrell R Boverhof; Edward W Carney
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.232

8.  State-of-the-science workshop report: issues and approaches in low-dose-response extrapolation for environmental health risk assessment.

Authors:  Ronald H White; Ila Cote; Lauren Zeise; Mary Fox; Francesca Dominici; Thomas A Burke; Paul D White; Dale B Hattis; Jonathan M Samet
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  The Key Events Dose-Response Framework: a cross-disciplinary mode-of-action based approach to examining dose-response and thresholds.

Authors:  Elizabeth Julien; Alan R Boobis; Stephen S Olin
Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 11.176

10.  Application of key events analysis to chemical carcinogens and noncarcinogens.

Authors:  Alan R Boobis; George P Daston; R Julian Preston; Stephen S Olin
Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 11.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.