Literature DB >> 17116651

Sex differences in semantic processing: event-related brain potentials distinguish between lower and higher order semantic analysis during word reading.

M Wirth1, H Horn, T Koenig, M Stein, A Federspiel, B Meier, C M Michel, W Strik.   

Abstract

Behavioral studies suggest that women and men differ in the strategic elaboration of verbally encoded information especially in the absence of external task demand. However, measuring such covert processing requires other than behavioral data. The present study used event-related potentials to compare sexes in lower and higher order semantic processing during the passive reading of semantically related and unrelated word pairs. Women and men showed the same early context effect in the P1-N1 transition period. This finding indicates that the initial lexical-semantic access is similar in men and women. In contrast, sexes differed in higher order semantic processing. Women showed an earlier and longer lasting context effect in the N400 accompanied by larger signal strength in temporal networks similarly recruited by men and women. The results suggest that women spontaneously conduct a deeper semantic analysis. This leads to faster processing of related words in the active neural networks as reflected in a shorter stability of the N400 map in women. Taken together, the findings demonstrate that there is a selective sex difference in the controlled semantic analysis during passive word reading that is not reflected in different functional organization but in the depth of processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17116651     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhl121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  15 in total

Review 1.  Sex and gender differences and biases in artificial intelligence for biomedicine and healthcare.

Authors:  Davide Cirillo; Silvina Catuara-Solarz; Czuee Morey; Emre Guney; Laia Subirats; Simona Mellino; Annalisa Gigante; Alfonso Valencia; María José Rementeria; Antonella Santuccione Chadha; Nikolaos Mavridis
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-06-01

2.  Tell me sweet little lies: An event-related potentials study on the processing of social lies.

Authors:  Eva M Moreno; Pilar Casado; Manuel Martín-Loeches
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  The Influence of Sex Information on Gender Word Processing.

Authors:  Alba Casado; Alfonso Palma; Daniela Paolieri
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2018-06

4.  Spatiotemporal mapping of sex differences during attentional processing.

Authors:  Andres H Neuhaus; Carolin Opgen-Rhein; Carsten Urbanek; Melanie Gross; Eric Hahn; Thi Minh Tam Ta; Simone Koehler; Michael Dettling
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  The functional anatomy of semantic retrieval is influenced by gender, menstrual cycle, and sex hormones.

Authors:  C Konrad; A Engelien; S Schöning; P Zwitserlood; A Jansen; E Pletziger; P Beizai; A Kersting; P Ohrmann; E Luders; R R Greb; W Heindel; V Arolt; H Kugel
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 3.575

6.  Lack of generalizability of sex differences in the fMRI BOLD activity associated with language processing in adults.

Authors:  S K Z Ihnen; Jessica A Church; Steven E Petersen; Bradley L Schlaggar
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Resting-state functional connectivity patterns predict Chinese word reading competency.

Authors:  Xiaosha Wang; Zaizhu Han; Yong He; Li Liu; Yanchao Bi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Empathy matters: ERP evidence for inter-individual differences in social language processing.

Authors:  Daniëlle van den Brink; Jos J A Van Berkum; Marcel C M Bastiaansen; Cathelijne M J Y Tesink; Miriam Kos; Jan K Buitelaar; Peter Hagoort
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  The effects of gender and self-insight on early semantic processing.

Authors:  Xu Xu; Chunyan Kang; Taomei Guo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  From episodic to habitual prospective memory: ERP-evidence for a linear transition.

Authors:  Beat Meier; Sibylle Matter; Brigitta Baumann; Stefan Walter; Thomas Koenig
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.