Literature DB >> 17116550

Why should surgeons care about clinical research methodology?

David C Chang1, Susanna L Matsen, Christopher E Simpkins.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A low prevalence of high-level clinical studies in the surgical literature has been reported previously. We reviewed a recent sample of surgical publications to assess the current status of clinical research. STUDY
DESIGN: A 3-month sample of journal articles in Archives of Surgery, Surgery, and Annals of Surgery in 2005 was evaluated by two independent reviewers to determine the distribution of articles in established evidence classes.
RESULTS: A total of 133 publications were identified in the three journals during the time periods reviewed, including 101 clinical articles and 30 basic science articles. Among the clinical papers, there were 8 class I studies (7.9%), 34 class II studies (33.7%), and more than half were class III studies (59 of 101, or 58.4%).
CONCLUSIONS: The low prevalence of high-level evidence to guide surgical management of patients persists in major general surgery journals. We believe that education about proper research methodology is not only important for researchers, but is also important for practicing surgeons, and can have important health policy implications as well.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17116550     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.08.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  9 in total

1.  Standardization of intraoperative neuromonitoring of recurrent laryngeal nerve in thyroid operation: to the editor.

Authors:  G Dionigi; R Dionigi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Clinical research methodology I: introduction to randomized trials.

Authors:  Lillian S Kao; Jon E Tyson; Martin L Blakely; Kevin P Lally
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Randomized controlled trials in surgery: are we still missing something important?

Authors:  Michael Moen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  Do surgical trials meet the scientific standards for clinical trials?

Authors:  Danielle M Wenner; Baruch A Brody; Anna F Jarman; Jacob M Kolman; Nelda P Wray; Carol M Ashton
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Anterior colporrhaphy: why surgeon performance is paramount.

Authors:  Michael Moen; Michael Noone; Brett Vassallo
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 6.  Publication bias in Kienböck's disease: systematic review.

Authors:  Lee Squitieri; Elizabeth Petruska; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.230

Review 7.  Analysis of publication bias in the literature for distal radius fracture.

Authors:  Ian C Sando; Sunitha Malay; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 2.230

8.  Review of 20 years of vascular surgery research in Australasia: Defining future directions.

Authors:  Judy Wang; Jasamine Coles-Black; Matija Radojcic; Jason Chuen; Philip Smart
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2019-08-15

Review 9.  Review of research output of Australian and New Zealand colorectal surgeons over the past 20 years.

Authors:  Jessica Rahme; Adele Lee; Mat Matija Radojcic; Pith Beh Soh; Satish Warrier; Alexander Heriot; Nikolajs Zeps; Michael Smits; Philip Smart
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2020-12-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.