PURPOSE: To determine the response rate (RR) of neuroblastoma (NB) in children to temozolomide (TMZ), and evaluate the duration of response and tolerance of the drug in this patient population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicenter, phase II evaluation of an oral, daily schedule of TMZ (200 mg/m2/d x 5 days every 28 days) was undertaken in children with refractory or relapsed high-risk NB (metastatic or localized with Myc-N amplification). Response assessment was based on imaging with two-dimentional measurement of disease and meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) score. Activity was defined by a reduction in lesion size or isotope uptake at anytime. Methodology included a two-step design using Fleming's method with a first step of 15 patients and a second of 10 additional patients if two to four responses had been observed in the first cohort. All data was centrally reviewed by a panel. RESULTS: Twenty-five assessable patients were recruited over a 14-month period in 14 centers and received 94 cycles of chemotherapy. Twenty-three patients had metastatic NB either refractory (n = 9) or in relapse (n = 14). Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia was the most frequent toxicity (16% of cycles). Myelosuppression resulted in treatment delays and dose reductions (24% and 21% of cycles, respectively). Response (complete response, very good partial response, or partial response) was observed in five patients (RR = 20% +/- 8%) with a median duration of 6 months and an objective or mixed response in five additional patients. CONCLUSION: Temozolomide shows activity in heavily pretreated patients with NB, and deserves further evaluation in combination with another drug.
PURPOSE: To determine the response rate (RR) of neuroblastoma (NB) in children to temozolomide (TMZ), and evaluate the duration of response and tolerance of the drug in this patient population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicenter, phase II evaluation of an oral, daily schedule of TMZ (200 mg/m2/d x 5 days every 28 days) was undertaken in children with refractory or relapsed high-risk NB (metastatic or localized with Myc-N amplification). Response assessment was based on imaging with two-dimentional measurement of disease and meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) score. Activity was defined by a reduction in lesion size or isotope uptake at anytime. Methodology included a two-step design using Fleming's method with a first step of 15 patients and a second of 10 additional patients if two to four responses had been observed in the first cohort. All data was centrally reviewed by a panel. RESULTS: Twenty-five assessable patients were recruited over a 14-month period in 14 centers and received 94 cycles of chemotherapy. Twenty-three patients had metastatic NB either refractory (n = 9) or in relapse (n = 14). Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia was the most frequent toxicity (16% of cycles). Myelosuppression resulted in treatment delays and dose reductions (24% and 21% of cycles, respectively). Response (complete response, very good partial response, or partial response) was observed in five patients (RR = 20% +/- 8%) with a median duration of 6 months and an objective or mixed response in five additional patients. CONCLUSION:Temozolomide shows activity in heavily pretreated patients with NB, and deserves further evaluation in combination with another drug.
Authors: Jie Lu; John S Kovach; Francis Johnson; Jeffrey Chiang; Richard Hodes; Russell Lonser; Zhengping Zhuang Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-06-29 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Rajen Mody; Alice L Yu; Arlene Naranjo; Fan F Zhang; Wendy B London; Barry L Shulkin; Marguerite T Parisi; Sabah-E-Noor Servaes; Mitchell B Diccianni; Jacquelyn A Hank; Mildred Felder; Jennifer Birstler; Paul M Sondel; Shahab Asgharzadeh; Julia Glade-Bender; Howard Katzenstein; John M Maris; Julie R Park; Rochelle Bagatell Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2020-04-28 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Lars M Wagner; Judith G Villablanca; Clinton F Stewart; Kristine R Crews; Susan Groshen; C Patrick Reynolds; Julie R Park; John M Maris; Randall A Hawkins; Heike E Daldrup-Link; Hollie A Jackson; Katherine K Matthay Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-01-26 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Shannon F Rosati; Regan F Williams; Lindsey C Nunnally; Mackenzie C McGee; Thomas L Sims; Lorraine Tracey; Junfang Zhou; Meiyun Fan; Catherine Y Ng; Amit C Nathwani; Clinton F Stewart; Lawrence M Pfeffer; Andrew M Davidoff Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2008-12-03 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: W Cai; N V Maldonado; W Cui; N Harutyunyan; L Ji; R Sposto; C P Reynolds; N Keshelava Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-10-05 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Stephen T Keir; John M Maris; C Patrick Reynolds; Min H Kang; E Anders Kolb; Richard Gorlick; Richard Lock; Hernan Carol; Christopher L Morton; Jianrong Wu; Raushan T Kurmasheva; Peter J Houghton; Malcolm A Smith Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2013-01-17 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Brian H Kushner; Michael P Laquaglia; Kim Kramer; Shakeel Modak; Nai-Kong V Cheung Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 3.167