Literature DB >> 17114412

Lack of generalization of object discrimination between spatial contexts by a bat.

Kai Petra Stich1, York Winter.   

Abstract

Discrimination and generalization are important elements of cognition in the daily lives of animals. Nectar-feeding bats detect flowers by olfaction and probably vision, but also use echolocation and echo-perception of flowers in immediate target surroundings. The echo received from an interference-rich flower corolla is a function of a bat's own relative position in space. This raises the question how easily a free-flying bat will generalize an echo stimulus from a learning situation to a new spatial context where differences in relative flight approach trajectories may lead to an unfamiliar spectral composition of the self-generated echoes. We trained free-flying Glossophaga soricina in echoacoustic discrimination in a two-alternative forced-choice (2-AFC) paradigm at location A. We then tested at location B for spontaneous transfer of discrimination ability. Bats did not spontaneously transfer the discrimination ability acquired at A to location B. This lack of spontaneous generalization may have been caused by factors of the underlying learning mechanisms. 2-AFC tasks may not be representative of the natural foraging behaviour of flower-visiting bats. In contrast to insect-eating bats that constantly evaluate the environment to detect unpredictable prey, the spatial stability of flowers may allow flower visitors to rely on spatial memory to guide foraging. The 2-AFC task requires the disregard (learned irrelevance) of salient spatial location cues that are different at each new location. In Glossophaga, a conjunction between spatial context and 2-AFC discrimination learning may have inhibited the transfer of learned irrelevance of spatial location in the 2-AFC task to new spatial locations. Alternatively, the bats may have learnt the second discrimination task completely anew, and were faster only because of an acquired learning set. We suggest a dissociation between 2-AFC task acquisition and novel object discrimination learning to resolve the issue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17114412     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.02574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  4 in total

1.  Flower bats (Glossophaga soricina) and fruit bats (Carollia perspicillata) rely on spatial cues over shapes and scents when relocating food.

Authors:  Gerald G Carter; John M Ratcliffe; Bennett G Galef
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  The role of past experience in development of feeding behavior in common vampire bats.

Authors:  Jineth Berrío-Martínez; Samuel Kaiser; Michelle Nowak; Rachel A Page; Gerald G Carter
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 3.  Do Bats Have the Necessary Prerequisites for Symbolic Communication?

Authors:  Mirjam Knörnschild; Ahana A Fernandez
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-11-12

4.  Absent or low rate of adult neurogenesis in the hippocampus of bats (Chiroptera).

Authors:  Irmgard Amrein; Dina K N Dechmann; York Winter; Hans-Peter Lipp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.