Literature DB >> 17114186

ApoA-I mimetic peptides with differing ability to inhibit atherosclerosis also exhibit differences in their interactions with membrane bilayers.

Shaila P Handattu1, David W Garber, Dawn C Horn, Donald W Hughes, Bob Berno, Alex D Bain, Vinod K Mishra, Mayakonda N Palgunachari, Geeta Datta, G M Anantharamaiah, Richard M Epand.   

Abstract

Two homologous apoA-I mimetic peptides, 3F-2 and 3F(14), differ in their in vitro antiatherogenic properties (Epand, R. M., Epand, R. F., Sayer, B. G., Datta, G., Chaddha, M., and Anantharamaiah, G. M. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 51404-51414). In the present work, we demonstrate that the peptide 3F-2, which has more potent anti-inflammatory activity in vitro when administered intraperitoneally to female apoE null mice (20 microg/mouse/day) for 6 weeks, inhibits atherosclerosis (lesion area 15,800 +/- 1000 microm(2), n = 29), whereas 3F(14) does not (lesion area 20,400 +/- 1000 microm(2), n = 26) compared with control saline administered (19,900 +/- 1400 microm(2), n = 22). Plasma distribution of the peptides differs in that 3F-2 preferentially associates with high density lipoprotein, whereas 3F(14) preferentially associates with apoB-containing particles. After intraperitoneal injection of (14)C-labeled peptides, 3F(14) reaches a higher maximal concentration and has a longer half-time of elimination than 3F-2. A study of the effect of these peptides on the motional and organizational properties of phospholipid bilayers, using several NMR methods, demonstrates that the two peptides insert to different extents into membranes. 3F-2 with aromatic residues at the center of the nonpolar face partitions closer to the phospholipid head group compared with 3F(14). In contrast, only 3F(14) affects the terminal methyl group of the acyl chain, decreasing the (2)H order parameter and at the same time also decreasing the molecular motion of this methyl group. This dual effect of 3F(14) can be explained in terms of the cross-sectional shape of the amphipathic helix. These results support the proposal that the molecular basis for the difference in the biological activities of the two peptides lies with their different interactions with membranes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17114186     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M606231200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  24 in total

1.  Oral administration of L-mR18L, a single domain cationic amphipathic helical peptide, inhibits lesion formation in ApoE null mice.

Authors:  Shaila P Handattu; Geeta Datta; Richard M Epand; Raquel F Epand; Mayakonda N Palgunachari; Vinod K Mishra; Candyce E Monroe; Tamara D Keenum; Manjula Chaddha; G M Anantharamaiah; David W Garber
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 5.922

2.  Apolipoprotein mimetic peptides: Mechanisms of action as anti-atherogenic agents.

Authors:  David O Osei-Hwedieh; Marcelo Amar; Dmitri Sviridov; Alan T Remaley
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 12.310

3.  Two adjacent domains (141-150 and 151-160) of apoE covalently linked to a class A amphipathic helical peptide exhibit opposite atherogenic effects.

Authors:  Gaurav Nayyar; Shaila P Handattu; Candyce E Monroe; Manjula Chaddha; Geeta Datta; Vinod K Mishra; Tamara D Keenum; Mayakonda N Palgunachari; David W Garber; G M Anantharamaiah
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 5.162

4.  Peptide Mimetics of Apolipoproteins Improve HDL Function.

Authors:  Mohamad Navab; G M Anantharamaiah; Srinivasa T Reddy; Brian J Van Lenten; Georgette M Buga; Alan M Fogelman
Journal:  J Clin Lipidol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.766

5.  Asymmetry in the lipid affinity of bihelical amphipathic peptides. A structural determinant for the specificity of ABCA1-dependent cholesterol efflux by peptides.

Authors:  Amar A Sethi; John A Stonik; Fairwell Thomas; Steve J Demosky; Marcelo Amar; Edward Neufeld; H Bryan Brewer; W Sean Davidson; Wilissa D'Souza; Dmitri Sviridov; Alan T Remaley
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Sidedness of interfacial arginine residues and anti-atherogenicity of apolipoprotein A-I mimetic peptides.

Authors:  Gaurav Nayyar; Vinod K Mishra; Shaila P Handattu; Mayakonda N Palgunachari; Ronald Shin; David T McPherson; Champion C S Deivanayagam; David W Garber; Jere P Segrest; G M Anantharamaiah
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 5.922

7.  Transintestinal transport of the anti-inflammatory drug 4F and the modulation of transintestinal cholesterol efflux.

Authors:  David Meriwether; Dawoud Sulaiman; Alan Wagner; Victor Grijalva; Izumi Kaji; Kevin J Williams; Liqing Yu; Spencer Fogelman; Carmen Volpe; Steven J Bensinger; G M Anantharamaiah; Ishaiahu Shechter; Alan M Fogelman; Srinivasa T Reddy
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 5.922

Review 8.  HDL apolipoprotein-related peptides in the treatment of atherosclerosis and other inflammatory disorders.

Authors:  G S Getz; G D Wool; C A Reardon
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.116

Review 9.  The role of dysfunctional HDL in atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Mohamad Navab; Srinivasa T Reddy; Brian J Van Lenten; G M Anantharamaiah; Alan M Fogelman
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 5.922

Review 10.  Structure and function of HDL mimetics.

Authors:  Mohamad Navab; Ishaiahu Shechter; G M Anantharamaiah; Srinivasa T Reddy; Brian J Van Lenten; Alan M Fogelman
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 8.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.