Literature DB >> 17114180

The molecular basis for ligand specificity in a mouse olfactory receptor: a network of functionally important residues.

Tatjana Abaffy1, Arun Malhotra, Charles W Luetje.   

Abstract

Sequence differences between members of the mouse olfac-tory receptor MOR42 subfamily (MOR42-3 and MOR42-1) are likely to be the basis for variation in ligand binding preference among these receptors. We investigated the specificity of MOR42-3 for a variety of dicarboxylic acids. We used site-directed mutagenesis, guided by homology modeling and ligand docking studies, to locate functionally important residues. Receptors were expressed in Xenopus oocytes and assayed using high throughput electrophysiology. The importance of the Val-113 residue, located deep within the receptor, was analyzed in the context of interhelical interactions. We also screened additional residues predicted to be involved in ligand binding site, based on comparison of ortholog/paralog pairs from the mouse and human olfactory receptor genomes (Man, O., Gilad, Y., and Lancet, D. (2004) Protein Sci. 13, 240-254). A network of 8 residues in transmembrane domains III, V, and VI was identified. These residues form part of the ligand binding pocket of MOR42-3. C12 dicarboxylic acid did not activate the receptor in our functional assay, yet our docking simulations predicted its binding site in MOR42-3. Binding without activation implied that C12 dicarboxylic acid might act as an antagonist. In our functional assay, C12 dicarboxylic acid did indeed act as an antagonist of MOR42-3, in agreement with molecular docking studies. Our results demonstrate a powerful approach based on the synergy between computational predictions and physiological assays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17114180     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M609355200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  52 in total

1.  Genetic variation in odorant receptors contributes to variation in olfactory behavior in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  P K Richgels; S M Rollmann
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 2.  Odorant-specific modes of signaling in mammalian olfaction.

Authors:  Barry W Ache
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Odorant receptor polymorphisms and natural variation in olfactory behavior in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Stephanie M Rollmann; Ping Wang; Priya Date; Steven A West; Trudy F C Mackay; Robert R H Anholt
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Responsiveness of G protein-coupled odorant receptors is partially attributed to the activation mechanism.

Authors:  Yiqun Yu; Claire A de March; Mengjue J Ni; Kaylin A Adipietro; Jérôme Golebiowski; Hiroaki Matsunami; Minghong Ma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Preferential binding of an odor within olfactory receptors: a precursor to receptor activation.

Authors:  Peter C Lai; Brandon Guida; Jing Shi; Chiquito J Crasto
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 6.  Mammalian olfactory receptors: pharmacology, G protein coupling and desensitization.

Authors:  Aya Kato; Kazushige Touhara
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 9.261

7.  An olfactory receptor pseudogene whose function emerged in humans: a case study in the evolution of structure-function in GPCRs.

Authors:  Peter C Lai; Gautam Bahl; Maryse Gremigni; Valery Matarazzo; Olivier Clot-Faybesse; Catherine Ronin; Chiquito J Crasto
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2008-09-19

Review 8.  Neural computations with mammalian infochemicals.

Authors:  A Gelperin
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  A honey bee odorant receptor for the queen substance 9-oxo-2-decenoic acid.

Authors:  Kevin W Wanner; Andrew S Nichols; Kimberly K O Walden; Axel Brockmann; Charles W Luetje; Hugh M Robertson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  High throughput electrophysiology with Xenopus oocytes.

Authors:  Roger L Papke; Cathy Smith-Maxwell
Journal:  Comb Chem High Throughput Screen       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.339

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.