Literature DB >> 17113898

Prospective health-related quality-of-life assessment in an initial cohort of patients undergoing robotic radical prostatectomy.

Timothy Y Tseng1, Hubert R Kuebler, Quinton V Cancel, Leon Sun, William P Springhart, Brian C Murphy, David M Albala, Philipp Dahm.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To prospectively assess the health-related quality-of-life outcomes of patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy using a validated patient self-assessment questionnaire.
METHODS: Patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy between September 2003 and May 2005 were given the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite questionnaire preoperatively and 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months postoperatively. Patients with a minimum follow-up of 3 months were included in the analysis. The mean domain-specific health-related quality-of-life scores +/- SD and the proportion of patients achieving their baseline scores were calculated. Multivariate proportional hazards regression analysis was used to determine the potential prognostic factors for a return to baseline of the domain scores and continence.
RESULTS: The median follow-up was 9.5 months. The median time to recovery of the baseline summary scores was 6.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.9 to 7.2) in the urinary domain, 2.8 months (95% CI 2.0 to 3.7) in the bowel domain, and 3.0 months (95% CI 2.2 to 3.9) in the hormonal domain. The baseline sexual summary score was recovered by 19.2% of patients at 12 months. The median time to return of continence (0 to 1 pads/day) was 4.0 months (95% CI 3.0 to 4.9). The median time to the return of erections firm enough for intercourse was 13.5 months (95% CI 9.9 to 17.1). On multivariate proportional hazards regression analysis, age, body mass index, prostate size, nerve-sparing technique, and number of comorbidities were not significantly associated with the time to recovery of the baseline domain scores or continence.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy have a favorable health-related quality-of-life recovery profile that appears comparable to those of established surgical approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17113898     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.06.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  9 in total

1.  Quality of life after radical prostatectomy: Continuing to improve on our track record.

Authors:  Garson Chan; Stephen E Pautler
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Prospective comparison of the impact of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical prostatectomy on health-related quality of life and decision regret.

Authors:  B Joyce Davison; Andrew Matthew; Abbie M Gardner
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Is a return to baseline sexual function possible? An analysis of sexual function outcomes following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Adam W Levinson; Hugh J Lavery; Nicholas T Ward; Li-Ming Su; Christian P Pavlovich
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Caution with Use of the EPIC-50 Urinary Bother Scale: How Voiding Dysfunction Modifies its Performance.

Authors:  Lin Yang; Adam S Kibel; Graham A Colditz; Ratna Pakpahan; Kellie R Imm; Sonya Izadi; Robert L Grubb; Kathleen Y Wolin; Siobhan Sutcliffe
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Advances in robotic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Stephen A Boorjian; Matthew T Gettman
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Factors related to patient-perceived satisfaction after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy based on the expanded prostate cancer index composite survey.

Authors:  J H Kim; Y-S Ha; S J Jeong; S Kim; W-J Kim; T L Jang; I Y Kim
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 5.554

7.  Pediatric robotic surgery: A single-institutional review of the first 100 consecutive cases.

Authors:  John J Meehan; Anthony Sandler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Validated Prospective Assessment of Quality of Life After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: Beyond Continence and Erections.

Authors:  Simone Albisinni; Fouad Aoun; Thierry Quackels; Grégoire Assenmacher; Alexandre Peltier; Roland van Velthoven; Thierry Roumeguère
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2019 May-Jun

9.  Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery: Prospective Series of 186 Pediatric Surgeries.

Authors:  Mario Navarrete Arellano; Francisco Garibay González
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.418

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.