Literature DB >> 17113311

Measuring brain variability by extrapolating sparse tensor fields measured on sulcal lines.

Pierre Fillard1, Vincent Arsigny, Xavier Pennec, Kiralee M Hayashi, Paul M Thompson, Nicholas Ayache.   

Abstract

Modeling and understanding the variability of brain structures is a fundamental problem in neurosciences. Improved mathematical representations of structural brain variation are needed to help detect and understand genetic or disease related sources of abnormality, as well as to improve statistical power when integrating functional brain mapping data across subjects. In this paper, we develop a new mathematical model of normal brain variation based on a large set of cortical sulcal landmarks (72 per brain) delineated in each of 98 healthy human subjects scanned with 3D MRI (age: 51.8+/-6.2 years). We propose an original method to compute an average representation of the sulcal curves, which constitutes the mean anatomy. After affine alignment of the individual data across subjects, the second order moment distribution of the sulcal position is modeled as a sparse field of covariance tensors (symmetric, positive definite matrices). To extrapolate this information to the full brain, one has to overcome the limitations of the standard Euclidean matrix calculus. We propose an affine-invariant Riemannian framework to perform computations with tensors. In particular, we generalize radial basis function (RBF) interpolation and harmonic diffusion partial differential equations (PDEs) to tensor fields. As a result, we obtain a dense 3D variability map that agrees well with prior results on smaller subject samples. Moreover, "leave one (sulcus) out" tests show that our model is globally able to recover the missing information on brain variation when there is a consistent neighboring pattern of variability. Finally, we propose an innovative method to analyze the asymmetry of brain variability. As expected, the greatest asymmetries are found in regions that includes the primary language areas. Interestingly, any such asymmetries in anatomical variance, if it remains after anatomical normalization, could explain why there may be greater power to detect group activation in one hemisphere versus the other in fMRI studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17113311     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  18 in total

1.  Corticospinal tractography with morphological, functional and diffusion tensor MRI: a comparative study of four deterministic algorithms used in clinical routine.

Authors:  Romuald Seizeur; Nicolas Wiest-Daessle; Sylvain Prima; Camille Maumet; Jean-Christophe Ferre; Xavier Morandi
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2012-03-18       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Genetic influences on brain asymmetry: a DTI study of 374 twins and siblings.

Authors:  Neda Jahanshad; Agatha D Lee; Marina Barysheva; Katie L McMahon; Greig I de Zubicaray; Nicholas G Martin; Margaret J Wright; Arthur W Toga; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Brain surface conformal parameterization using Riemann surface structure.

Authors:  Yalin Wang; Lok Ming Lui; Xianfeng Gu; Kiralee M Hayashi; Tony F Chan; Arthur W Toga; Paul M Thompson; Shing-Tung Yau
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Voxelwise gene-wide association study (vGeneWAS): multivariate gene-based association testing in 731 elderly subjects.

Authors:  Derrek P Hibar; Jason L Stein; Omid Kohannim; Neda Jahanshad; Andrew J Saykin; Li Shen; Sungeun Kim; Nathan Pankratz; Tatiana Foroud; Matthew J Huentelman; Steven G Potkin; Clifford R Jack; Michael W Weiner; Arthur W Toga; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Inferring brain variability from diffeomorphic deformations of currents: an integrative approach.

Authors:  Stanley Durrleman; Xavier Pennec; Alain Trouvé; Paul Thompson; Nicholas Ayache
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  Corticospinal tract asymmetry and handedness in right- and left-handers by diffusion tensor tractography.

Authors:  Romuald Seizeur; Elsa Magro; Sylvain Prima; Nicolas Wiest-Daesslé; Camille Maumet; Xavier Morandi
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  Conformal invariants for multiply connected surfaces: Application to landmark curve-based brain morphometry analysis.

Authors:  Jie Shi; Wen Zhang; Miao Tang; Richard J Caselli; Yalin Wang
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 8.545

8.  An automated pipeline for cortical sulcal fundi extraction.

Authors:  Gang Li; Lei Guo; Jingxin Nie; Tianming Liu
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 8.545

9.  A continuous STAPLE for scalar, vector, and tensor images: an application to DTI analysis.

Authors:  Olivier Commowick; Simon K Warfield
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Optimizing power to track brain degeneration in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment with tensor-based morphometry: an ADNI study of 515 subjects.

Authors:  Xue Hua; Suh Lee; Igor Yanovsky; Alex D Leow; Yi-Yu Chou; April J Ho; Boris Gutman; Arthur W Toga; Clifford R Jack; Matt A Bernstein; Eric M Reiman; Danielle J Harvey; John Kornak; Norbert Schuff; Gene E Alexander; Michael W Weiner; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.