Literature DB >> 17112655

Effect of air bubbles in the coupling medium on efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Arun Jain1, Tariq K Shah.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Replacement of the water bath by a water cushion in newer lithotriptors introduces an acoustic interface and an ideal coupling agent is required to prevent energy loss at this interface. We aim to study the effect of bubbles in the coupling media on efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) by an in vitro experiment.
METHODS: Using a standardised in vitro model 40 artificial stones were randomly treated on Modulith SLK lithotriptor using either conventional ultrasound gel (high bubble content) before and after displacing visible bubbles, a thin ultrasound gel (Therasonic) or silicon oil (both with negligible bubbles). Percentage area covered by bubbles in each case and the diameters and depth of crater created in each stone were measured by two blinded observers to determine the correlation between the bubble contents and disintegration efficacy. In vivo effect of two ultrasound gels was compared in terms of pain scores and stone fragmentation rates in ten patients treated with both gels.
RESULTS: Volume of the craters was significantly greater with the Therasonic gel (102.4+/-33.4 mm3) or silicon oil (98.8+/-9.8 mm3) than the conventional ultrasound gel (49.2+/-32.6 mm3). But it was greatest (p<0.001) with ultrasound gel without bubbles (163.5+/-22.6 mm3). Depth and volume of the stone crater increased significantly with decreasing bubble contents of gel (p<0.001). Compared to standard ultrasound gel, patients treated with Therasonic gel reported significantly higher pain scores (median 3.5 vs. 8.0; p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy of ESWL is significantly correlated to air bubbles within the coupling gel and can be improved significantly by eliminating the bubbles from the coupling medium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17112655     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.10.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  20 in total

Review 1.  [Modern urinary stone therapy: is the era of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy at an end?].

Authors:  A Miernik; K Wilhelm; P Ardelt; S Bulla; M Schoenthaler
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Aspects on how extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy should be carried out in order to be maximally effective.

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius; Christian G Chaussy
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2012-06-27

3.  CUA Guideline: Management of ureteral calculi.

Authors:  Michael Ordon; Sero Andonian; Brian Blew; Trevor Schuler; Ben Chew; Kenneth T Pace
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Editorial comment: Size and location of defects at the coupling interface affect lithotripter performance.

Authors:  Jens Rassweiler
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 5.  Recent advances in lithotripsy technology and treatment strategies: A systematic review update.

Authors:  H E Elmansy; J E Lingeman
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 6.071

6.  [Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy].

Authors:  J Klein; C Netsch; K D Sievert; A Miernik; J Westphal; H Leyh; T R W Herrmann; P Olbert; A Häcker; A Bachmann; R Homberg; M Schoenthaler; J Rassweiler; A J Gross
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 7.  Shock wave technology and application: an update.

Authors:  Jens J Rassweiler; Thomas Knoll; Kai-Uwe Köhrmann; James A McAteer; James E Lingeman; Robin O Cleveland; Michael R Bailey; Christian Chaussy
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Size and location of defects at the coupling interface affect lithotripter performance.

Authors:  Guangyan Li; James C Williams; Yuri A Pishchalnikov; Ziyue Liu; James A McAteer
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 9.  Shock wave lithotripsy: the new phoenix?

Authors:  Andreas Neisius; Michael E Lipkin; Jens J Rassweiler; Pei Zhong; Glenn M Preminger; Thomas Knoll
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Improved acoustic coupling for shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Joshua S Neucks; Yuri A Pishchalnikov; Anthony J Zancanaro; Jonathan N VonDerHaar; James C Williams; James A McAteer
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2008-01-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.