Arun Jain1, Tariq K Shah. 1. Department of Urology, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, United Kingdom. a.jain@hotmail.co.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Replacement of the water bath by a water cushion in newer lithotriptors introduces an acoustic interface and an ideal coupling agent is required to prevent energy loss at this interface. We aim to study the effect of bubbles in the coupling media on efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) by an in vitro experiment. METHODS: Using a standardised in vitro model 40 artificial stones were randomly treated on Modulith SLK lithotriptor using either conventional ultrasound gel (high bubble content) before and after displacing visible bubbles, a thin ultrasound gel (Therasonic) or silicon oil (both with negligible bubbles). Percentage area covered by bubbles in each case and the diameters and depth of crater created in each stone were measured by two blinded observers to determine the correlation between the bubble contents and disintegration efficacy. In vivo effect of two ultrasound gels was compared in terms of pain scores and stone fragmentation rates in ten patients treated with both gels. RESULTS: Volume of the craters was significantly greater with the Therasonic gel (102.4+/-33.4 mm3) or silicon oil (98.8+/-9.8 mm3) than the conventional ultrasound gel (49.2+/-32.6 mm3). But it was greatest (p<0.001) with ultrasound gel without bubbles (163.5+/-22.6 mm3). Depth and volume of the stone crater increased significantly with decreasing bubble contents of gel (p<0.001). Compared to standard ultrasound gel, patients treated with Therasonic gel reported significantly higher pain scores (median 3.5 vs. 8.0; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy of ESWL is significantly correlated to air bubbles within the coupling gel and can be improved significantly by eliminating the bubbles from the coupling medium.
OBJECTIVES: Replacement of the water bath by a water cushion in newer lithotriptors introduces an acoustic interface and an ideal coupling agent is required to prevent energy loss at this interface. We aim to study the effect of bubbles in the coupling media on efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) by an in vitro experiment. METHODS: Using a standardised in vitro model 40 artificial stones were randomly treated on Modulith SLK lithotriptor using either conventional ultrasound gel (high bubble content) before and after displacing visible bubbles, a thin ultrasound gel (Therasonic) or silicon oil (both with negligible bubbles). Percentage area covered by bubbles in each case and the diameters and depth of crater created in each stone were measured by two blinded observers to determine the correlation between the bubble contents and disintegration efficacy. In vivo effect of two ultrasound gels was compared in terms of pain scores and stone fragmentation rates in ten patients treated with both gels. RESULTS: Volume of the craters was significantly greater with the Therasonic gel (102.4+/-33.4 mm3) or silicon oil (98.8+/-9.8 mm3) than the conventional ultrasound gel (49.2+/-32.6 mm3). But it was greatest (p<0.001) with ultrasound gel without bubbles (163.5+/-22.6 mm3). Depth and volume of the stone crater increased significantly with decreasing bubble contents of gel (p<0.001). Compared to standard ultrasound gel, patients treated with Therasonic gel reported significantly higher pain scores (median 3.5 vs. 8.0; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy of ESWL is significantly correlated to air bubbles within the coupling gel and can be improved significantly by eliminating the bubbles from the coupling medium.
Authors: Michael Ordon; Sero Andonian; Brian Blew; Trevor Schuler; Ben Chew; Kenneth T Pace Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2015-12-14 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: J Klein; C Netsch; K D Sievert; A Miernik; J Westphal; H Leyh; T R W Herrmann; P Olbert; A Häcker; A Bachmann; R Homberg; M Schoenthaler; J Rassweiler; A J Gross Journal: Urologe A Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 0.639
Authors: Jens J Rassweiler; Thomas Knoll; Kai-Uwe Köhrmann; James A McAteer; James E Lingeman; Robin O Cleveland; Michael R Bailey; Christian Chaussy Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2011-02-23 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Andreas Neisius; Michael E Lipkin; Jens J Rassweiler; Pei Zhong; Glenn M Preminger; Thomas Knoll Journal: World J Urol Date: 2014-08-01 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Joshua S Neucks; Yuri A Pishchalnikov; Anthony J Zancanaro; Jonathan N VonDerHaar; James C Williams; James A McAteer Journal: Urol Res Date: 2008-01-03