Literature DB >> 17110170

Religion, infertility and assisted reproductive technology.

Andrew Dutney1.   

Abstract

This chapter describes religion in general before discussing the centrality of its concern for family formation. In light of this, the impact of infertility on religious people is considered. Recognizing religion's cautiously positive attitude towards assisted reproductive technology (ART) as a potential ally in the project of family formation and the relief of infertility, two areas that have caused concern for the religions are discussed: perceived threats to marriage and the sanctity of the human embryo. Throughout the chapter, illustrations are drawn from particular religions, including Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Hinduism and Buddhism. There are striking similarities in their concerns and in the range of their responses to ART. Ways in which medical personnel should take into account the religious dimensions of the experience of infertility in their care for patients are suggested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17110170     DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 1521-6934            Impact factor:   5.237


  12 in total

1.  Anticipating the use of life extension technologies.

Authors:  Jayne C Lucke; Danielle Herbert; Brad Partridge; Wayne D Hall
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Specifying the effects of religion on medical helpseeking: the case of infertility.

Authors:  Arthur Greil; Julia McQuillan; Maureen Benjamins; David R Johnson; Katherine M Johnson; Chelsea R Heinz
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Religiosity: Its Impact on Coping Styles Among Women Undergoing Fertility Treatment.

Authors:  O Grinstein-Cohen; A Katz; O Sarid
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2017-06

4.  Religious Scholars' Attitudes and Views on Ethical Issues Pertaining to Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) in Malaysia.

Authors:  A Olesen; S N Nor; L Amin
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 1.352

5.  Condition, disease, disability: how the label used to describe infertility may affect public support for fertility treatment coverage.

Authors:  Abigail C Mancuso; Karen M Summers; Rebecca Chung; Ginny L Ryan; Aaron M Scherer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Making hard choices easier: a prospective, multicentre study to assess the efficacy of a fertility-related decision aid in young women with early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  M Peate; B Meiser; B C Cheah; C Saunders; P Butow; B Thewes; R Hart; K-A Phillips; M Hickey; M Friedlander
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 7.  Using fertile couples as embryo donors: An ethical dilemma.

Authors:  Leila Alizadeh; Reza Omani Samani
Journal:  Iran J Reprod Med       Date:  2014-03

8.  A Survey on Oocyte Donation: Turkish Fertile and Infertile Women's Opinions.

Authors:  Aygul Akyuz; Nese Sever; Emre Karasahin; Gulten Guvenc; Suzan Cek
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-11-01

9.  Women's Experiences and Preferences in Relation to Infertility Counselling: A Multifaith Dialogue.

Authors:  Robab Latifnejad Roudsari; Helen T Allan
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-12-22

10.  Protestant Christian attitudes to ART.

Authors:  M Best; M Sleasman; E Hegedus; T E Schlub
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2019-09-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.