Literature DB >> 17107292

Theoretical foundations for interventions designed to promote informed decision making for cancer screening.

Deborah J Bowen1, Jennifer D Allen, Thuy Vu, Robin E Johnson, Kelly Fryer-Edwards, Alton Hart.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Decision aids are currently being developed and evaluated for use in cancer-screening decisional settings.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to review and discuss the theoretical basis of interventions to promote informed decision making in cancer screening.
METHODS: We reviewed interventions cited in Briss et al. and Rimer et al. to identify their theoretical basis, intervention content, measurement strategies, and outcomes.
RESULTS: Few interventions had a strong, decision-oriented conceptual basis. This was apparent in their intervention content, the measurement strategy, and the choice of outcomes for the study.
CONCLUSIONS: We recommend that more research occur into the basis of decision making in cancer screening and that future interventions use this research to rigorously design and evaluate decision aids to help people make choices about cancer screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17107292     DOI: 10.1207/s15324796abm3203_5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Behav Med        ISSN: 0883-6612


  18 in total

1.  Development of a spiritually based educational intervention to increase informed decision making for prostate cancer screening among church-attending African American men.

Authors:  Cheryl L Holt; Theresa A Wynn; Penny Southward; Mark S Litaker; Sanford Jeames; Emily Schulz
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2009-09

2.  Personalizing Second-Line Type 2 Diabetes Treatment Selection: Combining Network Meta-analysis, Individualized Risk, and Patient Preferences for Unified Decision Support.

Authors:  Sung Eun Choi; Seth A Berkowitz; John S Yudkin; Huseyin Naci; Sanjay Basu
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Do men make informed decisions about prostate cancer screening? Baseline results from the "take the wheel" trial.

Authors:  Jennifer D Allen; Megan K D Othus; Alton Hart; Anshu P Mohllajee; Yi Li; Deborah Bowen
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Are evidence-based, community-engaged energy balance interventions enough for extremely vulnerable populations?

Authors:  Nancy E Schoenberg; Yelena N Tarasenko; Claire Snell-Rood
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Preserving the self: the process of decision making about hereditary breast cancer and ovarian cancer risk reduction.

Authors:  A Fuchsia Howard; Lynda G Balneaves; Joan L Bottorff; Patricia Rodney
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2010-10-27

Review 6.  A systematic review of shared decision making interventions in child and youth mental health: synthesising the use of theory, intervention functions, and behaviour change techniques.

Authors:  Daniel Hayes; Julian Edbrooke-Childs; Rosa Town; Miranda Wolpert; Nick Midgley
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 4.785

7.  Prediction of health professionals' intention to screen for decisional conflict in clinical practice.

Authors:  France Légaré; Ian D Graham; Annette C O'Connor; Michèle Aubin; Lucie Baillargeon; Yvan Leduc; Jean Maziade
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 8.  Health care system approaches for cancer patient communication.

Authors:  John M Quillin; Kelly Tracy; Jessica S Ancker; Karen M Mustian; Lee Ellington; Vish Viswanath; Suzanne M Miller
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2009

9.  A comparison of a spiritually based and non-spiritually based educational intervention for informed decision making for prostate cancer screening among church-attending African-American men.

Authors:  Cheryl L Holt; Theresa A Wynn; Mark S Litaker; Penny Southward; Sanford Jeames; Emily Schulz
Journal:  Urol Nurs       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug

10.  Capturing treatment decision making among patients with solid tumors and their caregivers.

Authors:  Randy A Jones; Richard Steeves; Mary E Ropka; Patricia Hollen
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.