Literature DB >> 17106724

Methods to control ectomycorrhizal colonization: effectiveness of chemical and physical barriers.

François P Teste1, Justine Karst2, Melanie D Jones3, Suzanne W Simard4, Daniel M Durall3.   

Abstract

We conducted greenhouse experiments using Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca) seedlings where chemical methods (fungicides) were used to prevent ectomycorrhizal colonization of single seedlings or physical methods (mesh barriers) were used to prevent formation of mycorrhizal connections between neighboring seedlings. These methods were chosen for their ease of application in the field. We applied the fungicides, Topas (nonspecific) and Senator (ascomycete specific), separately and in combination at different concentrations and application frequencies to seedlings grown in unsterilized forest soils. Additionally, we assessed the ability of hyphae to penetrate mesh barriers of various pore sizes (0.2, 1, 20, and 500 microm) to form mycorrhizas on roots of neighboring seedlings. Ectomycorrhizal colonization was reduced by approximately 55% with the application of Topas at 0.5 g l(-1). Meshes with pore sizes of 0.2 and 1 microm were effective in preventing the formation of mycorrhizas via hyphal growth across the mesh barriers. Hence, meshes in this range of pore sizes could also be used to prevent the formation of common mycorrhizal networks in the field. Depending on the ecological question of interest, Topas or the employment of mesh with pore sizes <1 microm are suitable for restricting mycorrhization in the field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17106724     DOI: 10.1007/s00572-006-0083-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mycorrhiza        ISSN: 0940-6360            Impact factor:   3.387


  3 in total

1.  Mycorrhizal growth in pure cultures in the presence of pesticides.

Authors:  Tarja Laatikainen; H Heinonen-Tanski
Journal:  Microbiol Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.415

2.  Effects of mycorrhizae on growth and demography of tallgrass prairie forbs.

Authors:  G W Wilson; D C Hartnett; M D Smith; K Kobbeman
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.844

3.  Fungal-specific PCR primers developed for analysis of the ITS region of environmental DNA extracts.

Authors:  Kendall J Martin; Paul T Rygiewicz
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2005-05-18       Impact factor: 3.605

  3 in total
  10 in total

1.  Measuring carbon gains from fungal networks in understory plants from the tribe Pyroleae (Ericaceae): a field manipulation and stable isotope approach.

Authors:  Nicole A Hynson; Stefania Mambelli; Anthony S Amend; Todd E Dawson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Mycorrhizal networks affect ectomycorrhizal fungal community similarity between conspecific trees and seedlings.

Authors:  Marcus A Bingham; Suzanne W Simard
Journal:  Mycorrhiza       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 3.387

3.  Effect of diflubenzuron on the development of Pinus pinaster seedlings inoculated with the ectomycorrhizal fungus Pisolithus tinctorius.

Authors:  Miguel A Ramos; Nadine R Sousa; Albina R Franco; Vítor Costa; Rui S Oliveira; Paula M L Castro
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Mycorrhizal networks and distance from mature trees alter patterns of competition and facilitation in dry Douglas-fir forests.

Authors:  François P Teste; Suzanne W Simard
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Tree proximity, soil pathways and common mycorrhizal networks: their influence on the utilization of redistributed water by understory seedlings.

Authors:  Amanda L Schoonmaker; François P Teste; Suzanne W Simard; Robert D Guy
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Reducing airborne ectomycorrhizal fungi and growing non-mycorrhizal loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) seedlings in a greenhouse.

Authors:  Aaron D Stottlemyer; G Geoff Wang; Christina E Wells; David W Stottlemyer; Thomas A Waldrop
Journal:  Mycorrhiza       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 3.387

7.  Do mycorrhizal network benefits to survival and growth of interior Douglas-fir seedlings increase with soil moisture stress?

Authors:  Marcus A Bingham; Suzanne W Simard
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Ectomycorrhizal fungi mediate belowground carbon transfer between pines and oaks.

Authors:  Rotem Cahanovitc; Stav Livne-Luzon; Roey Angel; Tamir Klein
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 11.217

9.  Defoliation of interior Douglas-fir elicits carbon transfer and stress signalling to ponderosa pine neighbors through ectomycorrhizal networks.

Authors:  Yuan Yuan Song; Suzanne W Simard; Allan Carroll; William W Mohn; Ren Sen Zeng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Effects of warming on ectomycorrhizal colonization and nitrogen nutrition of Picea asperata seedlings grown in two contrasting forest ecosystems.

Authors:  Yuejiao Li; Didi Sun; Dandan Li; Zhenfeng Xu; Chunzhang Zhao; Honghui Lin; Qing Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.