| Literature DB >> 26655633 |
Yuejiao Li1,2,3, Didi Sun1,3, Dandan Li1,4, Zhenfeng Xu1,5, Chunzhang Zhao1, Honghui Lin2, Qing Liu1.
Abstract
Ectomycorrhiza (ECM) plays an important role in plant nitrogen (N) nutrition and regulates plant responded to climate warming. We conducted a field experiment in a natural forest and a plantation in the eastern Tibetan Plateau to estimate the warming effects of open-top chambers (OTC) on ECM and N nutrition of Picea asperata seedlings. Four-year warming significantly decreased ECM colonization, ECM fungal biomass, fine root vigor, and the N concentration of leaf, stem and coarse root, but significantly increased fine root N concentration and N content of leaf, stem, fine root and whole plant in natural forest. Contrarily, warming induced no obvious change in most of these parameters in plantation. Moreover, warming decreased rhizospheric soil inorganic N content in both forests. Our results showed that four-year warming was not beneficial for ECM colonization of P. asperata seedlings in the two forests, and the seedlings in natural forest were more sensitive and flexible to experimental warming than in plantation. The changes of ECM colonization and fine root biomass for effective N uptake would be good for plant growth and remit N leaching under future warming in natural forest.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26655633 PMCID: PMC4674696 DOI: 10.1038/srep17546
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Effects of warming and forest type on ectomycorrhizal (ECM) colonization of P. asperata seedlings (a) and ECM fungal biomass in rhizospheric soil (b).
Values indicate means ± SE, n = 3. Warming effects in both natural forest and plantation were assessed by student t-test, F and P values are given by two-way ANOVA for the effects of W: warming, F: forest type, and W*F: interaction of warming and forest type; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, NS not significant.
Figure 2Effects of warming and forest type on the rhizospheric soil inorganic N (NH4+-N and NO3−-N).
Values indicate means ± SE, n = 3. Warming effects in both natural forest and plantation were assessed by student t-test; F values are given by two-way ANOVA for the effects of W: warming, F: forest type, and W*F: interaction of warming and forest type; *P < 0.1; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Effects of warming and forest type on plant biomass (FB, CB, SB, LB, and TB), the ratio of root/shoot (R/S), and plant Nitrogen contents (FNC, CNC, SNC, LNC, and TNC) of P. asperata.
| Natural forest | Plantation | P-value | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unwarming | Warming | t-test | Unwarming | Warming | t-test | W | F | W*F | |
| FB (g) | 1.01 ± 0.09 | 1.72 ± 0.13 | 1.57 ± 0.26 | 2.25 ± 0.20 | 0.107 | 0.936 | |||
| CB (g) | 1.50 ± 0.10 | 1.79 ± 0.17 | 0.203 | 2.05 ± 0.18 | 2.58 ± 0.18 | 0.100 | 0.462 | ||
| SB (g) | 6.50 ± 0.34 | 9.97 ± 0.50 | 6.73 ± 0.56 | 8.96 ± 0.21 | 0.391 | 0.189 | |||
| LB (g) | 5.10 ± 0.17 | 8.70 ± 0.25 | 5.68 ± 0.37 | 6.69 ± 0.23 | 0.082 | ||||
| TB (g) | 14.11 ± 0.63 | 22.17 ± 0.84 | 16.03 ± 1.36 | 20.48 ± 0.81 | 0.909 | 0.094 | |||
| R/S | 0.216 ± 0.012 | 0.188 ± 0.014 | 0.206 | 0.289 ± 0.014 | 0.308 ± 0.015 | 0.436 | 0.731 | 0.138 | |
| FNC (mg) | 9.11 ± 0.89 | 17.84 ± 1.39 | 11.03 ± 1.98 | 14.69 ± 0.87 | 0.165 | 0.661 | 0.099 | ||
| CNC (mg) | 10.48 ± 0.42 | 10.36 ± 0.92 | 0.909 | 11.46 ± 0.30 | 12.41 ± 1.05 | 0.432 | 0.594 | 0.076 | 0.492 |
| SNC (mg) | 53.55 ± 3.45 | 67.08 ± 3.75 | 0.057 | 46.30 ± 2.22 | 63.81 ± 2.01 | 0.113 | 0.520 | ||
| LNC (mg) | 66.85 ± 2.10 | 90.04 ± 2.57 | 59.14 ± 4.91 | 56.50 ± 0.25 | 0.620 | ||||
| TNC (mg) | 139.99 ± 6.24 | 185.32 ± 7.70 | 127.93 ± 8.87 | 147.41 ± 4.01 | 0.116 | 0.100 | |||
Values indicate means ± SE, n = 3. FB, fine root biomass; CB coarse root biomass; SB, stem biomass; LB, leaf biomass; TB, total plant biomass; FNC, fine root nitrogen content; CNC, coarse root nitrogen content; SNC, stem nitrogen content; LNC, leaf nitrogen content; TNC, total plant nitrogen content. Warming effects in both natural forest and plantation were assessed by student t-test; F values are given by two-way ANOVA for the effects of W: warming, F: forest type, and W*F: interaction of warming and forest type. P < 0.05 are bold.
Figure 3Effects of warming on nitrogen (N) concentrations of fine roots, coarse roots, stems and leaves of P. asperata seedlings grown in natural forest (a) and plantation (b).
Values indicate means ± SE, n = 3. Warming effects in both natural forest and plantation were assessed by student t-test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, NS not significant.
Results of two-way ANOVA showing the P values for responses of fine root, coarse root, stem, and leaf N concentrations of P. asperata to warming and forest type.
| Factor | N concentrations (mg·g−1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fine root | Coarse root | Stem | Leaf | |
| W | 0.053 | |||
| F | ||||
| W*F | 0.492 | 0.054 | ||
W: warming, F: forest type, and W*F: interaction of warming and forest type. P < 0.05 are bold.
Figure 4Effects of warming and forest type on root vigor (RV) (a) and nitrate reductase (NR) activity (b) of P. asperata seedlings.
Values indicate means ± SE, n = 3. Warming effects in both natural forest and plantation were assessed by student t-test, F and P values are given by two-way ANOVA for the effects of W: warming, F: forest type, and W*F: interaction of warming and forest type; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, NS not significant.
Pearson’s correlation coefficients between ECM colonization (ECMc) and plant N concentrations (FN, CN, SN, and LN), biomass (FB, CB, SB, LB, and TB), physiology (RV and NR) and rhizosphere soil NH4 +-N and NO3 −-N content across all of the treatments.
| ECMB | FN | CN | SN | LN | FB | CB | SB | LB | TB | RV | NR | NH4 + -N | NO3−-N | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECMc | −0.500 | 0.704 | 0.785 | 0.631 | 0.904 | −0.702 | −0.752 | −0.223 | −0.165 | −0.366 | 0.893 | −0.538 | 0.883 | 0.959 |
| ECMB | 1 | −0.947 | −0.355 | 0.144 | −0.367 | 0.311 | 0.592 | −0.368 | −0.596 | −0.285 | −0.199 | 0.535 | −0.292 | −0.603 |
| FN | 1 | 0.489 | 0.093 | 0.511 | −0.402 | −0.646 | 0.331 | 0.502 | 0.210 | 0.406 | −0.537 | 0.458 | 0.789 | |
| CN | 1 | 0.703 | 0.880 | −0.890 | −0.860 | −0.589 | −0.436 | −0.682 | 0.733 | −0.606 | 0.916 | 0.812 | ||
| SN | 1 | 0.687 | −0.557 | −0.390 | −0.575 | −0.638 | −0.648 | 0.746 | −0.212 | 0.722 | 0.597 | |||
| LN | 1 | −0.849 | −0.815 | −0.564 | −0.452 | −0.665 | 0.860 | −0.688 | 0.960 | 0.858 | ||||
| FB | 1 | 0.913 | 0.664 | 0.520 | 0.772 | −0.671 | 0.611 | −0.833 | −0.683 | |||||
| CB | 1 | 0.427 | 0.223 | 0.544 | −0.657 | 0.582 | −0.810 | −0.777 | ||||||
| SB | 1 | 0.940 | 0.981 | −0.449 | 0.255 | −0.587 | −0.138 | |||||||
| LB | 1 | 0.931 | −0.443 | 0.061 | −0.480 | −0.039 | ||||||||
| TB | 1 | −0.563 | 0.303 | −0.683 | −0.277 | |||||||||
| RV | 1 | −0.261 | 0.899 | 0.814 | ||||||||||
| NR | 1 | −0.568 | −0.589 | |||||||||||
| NH4 + -N | 1 | 0.870 | ||||||||||||
| NO3−-N | 1 |
ECMc, ectomycorrhizal colonization; ECMB, ectomycorrhizal fungal biomass; FN, fine root N concentration; CN, coarse root N concentration; SN, stem N concentration; LN, leaf N concentration; FB, fine root biomass; CB, coarse root biomass; SB, stem biomass; LB, leaf biomass; TB, total plant biomass; RV, root vigor; NR, nitrate reductase activity;. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.