Literature DB >> 17106713

Displaced proximal humeral fractures: intramedullary nailing versus conservative treatment.

Chris M van den Broek1, Marijn van den Besselaar, Jean M F Coenen, Paul A Vegt.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A variety of different treatment options are available for displaced three- or four-part fractures. In a retrospective cohort study we evaluated the results of intramedullary nailing with the ACE nail and conservative treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients suffered a neer 4, 5 or 6 proximal humeral fracture who were treated with intramedullary nailing. Sixteen patients received conservative treatment for their Neer 4, 5 or 6 fracture.
RESULTS: Taking critical remarks in consideration, the results of intramedullary nailing are not very satisfactory compared to the conservative-treated group. However functional results of our operative group are comparable to those from other studies in literature.
CONCLUSION: Displaced three- or four-part proximal humeral fractures can be treated by intramedullary nailing. Familiarity with the fracture deformity and experience with the surgical techniques are critical for successful operative treatment outcome. Most complications in the operative treatment group can be avoided; inadequate reduction can lead to wrong insertion place with secondary problems (dislocation and subacromial impingement). Also future improvements in osteosynthesis like angle stable screw fixation (osteoporosis) and minimally invasive device will probably decrease the complication rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17106713     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-006-0250-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  7 in total

1.  Treatment of complex proximal humeral fracture: plate and tension band fixation versus conservative therapy.

Authors:  Yangbai Sun; Li Li; Jiezhi Dai; Ting Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-05-15

Review 2.  Surgical versus conservative treatment for displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tao Fu; Chengyan Xia; Zonghuan Li; Hua Wu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-12-15

3.  [Proximal humerus fracture: is fixed-angle plate osteosynthesis superior to conservative treatment?].

Authors:  C Krettek; U Wiebking
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Primary shoulder arthroplasty versus conservative treatment for comminuted proximal humeral fractures: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Dennis den Hartog; Jeroen de Haan; Niels W Schep; Wim E Tuinebreijer
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2010-02-17

5.  Non-operative treatment of four-part fractures of the proximal end of the humerus: results of a prospective and retrospective multicentric study.

Authors:  Romain Bouchet; Damien Block; Thomas D'ollonne; François Gadea; Julia Gaillot; François Sirveaux; Dominique Saragaglia
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Open reduction internal fixation vs non-operative management in proximal humerus fractures: a prospective, randomized controlled trial protocol.

Authors:  Lisa Howard; Randa Berdusco; Franco Momoli; J Pollock; Allan Liew; Steve Papp; Karl-Andre Lalonde; Wade Gofton; Sara Ruggiero; Peter Lapner
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-08-18       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Conservative treatment of 3-part and 4-part proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review.

Authors:  Manuel Soler-Peiro; Lorena García-Martínez; Luis Aguilella; Marcelino Perez-Bermejo
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 2.359

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.