Literature DB >> 17106701

Post-therapy surveillance of patients with uterine cancers: value of integrated FDG PET/CT in the detection of recurrence.

Sandro Sironi1, Maria Picchio, Claudio Landoni, Stefania Galimberti, Mauro Signorelli, Valentino Bettinardi, Patrizia Perego, Costantino Mangioni, Cristina Messa, Ferruccio Fazio.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to prospectively determine the diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT in the detection of recurrence in patients with treated uterine cancers.
METHODS: Twenty-five women, ranging in age from 37 to 79 years (mean 58.9 years), who underwent primary surgical treatment for either a cervical or an endometrial cancer met the inclusion criterion of the study, which was suspicion of recurrence based on results of routine follow-up procedures. PET/CT was performed after administration of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG); two readers interpreted the images in consensus. Histopathological findings or correlation with results of subsequent clinical and imaging follow-up examinations served as the reference standard. Diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT was reported in terms of the proportion of correctly classified patients and lesion sites.
RESULTS: Tumour recurrence was found at histopathological analysis or follow-up examinations after PET/CT in 14 (56%) of the 25 patients. Patient-based sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of PET/CT for detection of tumour recurrence were 92.9%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 91.7% and 96.0%, respectively. Lesion site-based sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of PET/CT were 94.7%, 99.5%, 94.7%, 99.5% and 99.0%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: This preliminary study shows that PET/CT may be an accurate method for the evaluation of recurrence in patients who have been treated for uterine cancers and are undergoing follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17106701     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-006-0251-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  41 in total

1.  Detection of early recurrence with 18F-FDG PET in patients with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Sang-Young Ryu; Moon-Hong Kim; Suck-Chul Choi; Chang-Woon Choi; Kyung-Hee Lee
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  18F-FDG PET imaging in posttherapy monitoring of cervical cancers: from diagnosis to prognosis.

Authors:  Tarik Z Belhocine
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Statistical methods for the estimation of sensitivity and specificity of site-specific diagnostic tests.

Authors:  C Ahn
Journal:  J Periodontal Res       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.419

4.  18F-FDG PET in the management of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Angel Chao; Ting-Chang Chang; Koon-Kwan Ng; Swei Hsueh; Huei-Jean Huang; Hung-Hsueh Chou; Chien-Sheng Tsai; Tzu-Chen Yen; Tzu-I Wu; Chyong-Huey Lai
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Unknown primary tumors: detection with dual-modality PET/CT--initial experience.

Authors:  Andreas Gutzeit; Gerald Antoch; Hilmar Kühl; Thomas Egelhof; Markus Fischer; Elke Hauth; Susanne Goehde; Andreas Bockisch; Jörg Debatin; Lutz Freudenberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-11-24       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Clinical value of FDG-PET in the follow up of post-operative patients with endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Tsuneo Saga; Tatsuya Higashi; Takayoshi Ishimori; Marcelo Mamede; Yuji Nakamoto; Takahiro Mukai; Toru Fujita; Kaori Togashi; Shigeo Yura; Toshihiro Higuchi; Masato Kita; Shingo Fujii; Junji Konishi
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.668

7.  The diagnostic accuracy of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in patients with gynecological malignancies.

Authors:  Dan Grisaru; Benny Almog; Charles Levine; Ur Metser; Ami Fishman; Hedva Lerman; Joseph B Lessing; Einat Even-Sapir
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Dynamic MR imaging of recurrent postoperative cervical cancer.

Authors:  Y Yamashita; M Harada; M Torashima; M Takahashi; K Miyazaki; N Tanaka; H Okamura
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Usefulness of (18)F-FDG PET in the post-therapy surveillance of endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Tarik Belhocine; Caroline De Barsy; Roland Hustinx; Jacqueline Willems-Foidart
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2002-06-19       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Posttherapy [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in carcinoma of the cervix: response and outcome.

Authors:  Perry W Grigsby; Barry A Siegel; Farrokh Dehdashti; Janet Rader; Imran Zoberi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  17 in total

1.  Low-dose non-enhanced CT versus full-dose contrast-enhanced CT in integrated PET/CT studies for the diagnosis of uterine cancer recurrence.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Kayo Suzuki; Yuji Nakamoto; Yumiko Onishi; Setsu Sakamoto; Michio Senda; Masato Kita; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Current therapy of patients with endometrial carcinoma. A critical review.

Authors:  S Marnitz; C Köhler
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Clinical value of FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of suspected recurrent ovarian cancer: is there an impact of FDG PET/CT on patient management?

Authors:  Ahmet Bilici; Bala Basak Oven Ustaalioglu; Mesut Seker; Nesrin Canpolat; Bulent Tekinsoy; Taflan Salepci; Mahmut Gumus
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  18F-FDG PET/CT evaluation of patients with ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Andrei H Iagaru; Erik S Mittra; Iain Ross McDougall; Andrew Quon; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.690

5.  Detection of recurrence by 18F-FDG PET in patients with endometrial cancer showing no evidence of disease.

Authors:  Sang-Young Ryu; Kidong Kim; Younha Kim; Sang-Il Park; Beob-Jong Kim; Moon-Hong Kim; Seok-Cheol Choi; Eui-Don Lee; Kyung-Hee Lee; Byung Il Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/MRI and MRI alone for whole-body staging and potential impact on therapeutic management of women with suspected recurrent pelvic cancer: a follow-up study.

Authors:  Lino M Sawicki; Julian Kirchner; Johannes Grueneisen; Verena Ruhlmann; Bahriye Aktas; Benedikt M Schaarschmidt; Michael Forsting; Ken Herrmann; Gerald Antoch; Lale Umutlu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  Novel imaging modalities in gynecologic cancer.

Authors:  Rebecca A Brooks; Matthew A Powell
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.075

8.  Performance of FDG-PET/CT for diagnosis of recurrent uterine cervical cancer.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Koji Murakami; Erena Yamasaki; Yasushi Domeki; Yasushi Kaji; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-19       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Performance of integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of recurrent uterine cancer: comparison with PET and enhanced CT.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Koji Murakami; Erena Yamasaki; Yasushi Domeki; Yasushi Kaji; Satoru Morita; Narufumi Suganuma; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Efficacy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of patients with recurrent cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  Erik Mittra; Tarek El-Maghraby; Cesar A Rodriguez; Andrew Quon; I Ross McDougall; Sanjiv S Gambhir; Andrei Iagaru
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.