Literature DB >> 12192557

Usefulness of (18)F-FDG PET in the post-therapy surveillance of endometrial carcinoma.

Tarik Belhocine1, Caroline De Barsy, Roland Hustinx, Jacqueline Willems-Foidart.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of fluorine-18 fluoro-2-deoxy- D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) in the post-therapy surveillance of endometrial carcinomas. Forty-one fully corrected whole-body PET studies were performed in 34 women with previously treated endometrial cancers as a part of their follow-up programme. In 28 studies, FDG PET was indicated to localise a recurrence suspected at the control visits on the basis of clinical examination and/or radiological abnormalities (chest X-ray, CT or MRI) and/or elevated tumour marker levels (CA125, CEA). Another 13 studies were performed as a simple surveillance procedure. Overall, in 26 studies PET detected recurrent disease, which was confirmed either by histology ( n=7) or by clinical and radiological outcomes ( n=19). In 88% of the cases, the PET findings confirmed recurrence suggested by routine follow-up. In the remaining 12% of cases, PET detected asymptomatic recurrences that were unsuspected at the control visits. Whole-body PET accurately localised the site of confirmed recurrences as being above and below the diaphragm in 50%, only below the diaphragm in 35% and only above the diaphragm in 15%. In one patient, however, PET missed microscopic lung metastases shown on thoracic CT, and in three studies, metabolic imaging results were not confirmed. In 11 of 12 negative PET studies, no subsequent clinical or radiological recurrences were observed with a median follow-up of 10 months. Overall, the results of PET agreed well with the final diagnosis (Cohen's kappa coefficient =0.78). In 9/26 patients (35%) with confirmed recurrences, the PET findings significantly altered the treatment choice by detecting either clinically or radiologically unsuspected distant metastases. The sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy and positive and negative predictive values of FDG PET imaging in the post-therapy surveillance of endometrial carcinomas were 96%, 78%, 90%, 89% and 91%, respectively. Indeed, the high likelihood ratio for a positive test result (4.5) and the low likelihood ratio for a negative test result (0.05) demonstrated the clinical utility of metabolic imaging in "ruling in" disease as well as "ruling out" recurrence. In conclusion, whole-body FDG PET appears useful in the post-therapy surveillance of endometrial cancers, both for the accurate localisation of suspected recurrences and for the detection of asymptomatic recurrent disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12192557     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-002-0878-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  10 in total

1.  Post-treatment [¹⁸F]FDG maximum standardized uptake value as a prognostic marker of recurrence in endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Hyun Hoon Chung; Jae Weon Kim; Keon Wook Kang; Noh-Hyun Park; Yong-Sang Song; June-Key Chung; Soon-Beom Kang
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  18F-FDG PET in the management of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Angel Chao; Ting-Chang Chang; Koon-Kwan Ng; Swei Hsueh; Huei-Jean Huang; Hung-Hsueh Chou; Chien-Sheng Tsai; Tzu-Chen Yen; Tzu-I Wu; Chyong-Huey Lai
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Post-therapy surveillance of patients with uterine cancers: value of integrated FDG PET/CT in the detection of recurrence.

Authors:  Sandro Sironi; Maria Picchio; Claudio Landoni; Stefania Galimberti; Mauro Signorelli; Valentino Bettinardi; Patrizia Perego; Costantino Mangioni; Cristina Messa; Ferruccio Fazio
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  18F-FDG PET/CT evaluation of patients with ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Andrei H Iagaru; Erik S Mittra; Iain Ross McDougall; Andrew Quon; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.690

5.  Detection of recurrence by 18F-FDG PET in patients with endometrial cancer showing no evidence of disease.

Authors:  Sang-Young Ryu; Kidong Kim; Younha Kim; Sang-Il Park; Beob-Jong Kim; Moon-Hong Kim; Seok-Cheol Choi; Eui-Don Lee; Kyung-Hee Lee; Byung Il Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  Performance of integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of recurrent uterine cancer: comparison with PET and enhanced CT.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Koji Murakami; Erena Yamasaki; Yasushi Domeki; Yasushi Kaji; Satoru Morita; Narufumi Suganuma; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  The clinical impact of [(18)F]FDG PET/CT for the management of recurrent endometrial cancer: correlation with clinical and histological findings.

Authors:  Hyun Hoon Chung; Won Jun Kang; Jae Weon Kim; Noh-Hyun Park; Yong-Sang Song; June-Key Chung; Soon-Beom Kang
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Imaging of endometrial and cervical cancer.

Authors:  Shilpa Patel; Sidath H Liyanage; Anju Sahdev; Andrea G Rockall; Rodney H Reznek
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2010-09-28

9.  Utility of Tc-PEG4-E[PEG4-c(RGDfK)]2 in Posttherapy Surveillance of Patients with Reelevated Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels.

Authors:  Rui Gao; Guangjian Zhang; Ling Chen; Zhaohui Zhu; Fan Wang; Aimin Yang
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 1.927

Review 10.  PET/CT and cross sectional imaging of gynecologic malignancy.

Authors:  Revathy B Iyer; Aparna Balachandran; Catherine E Devine
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.909

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.