Literature DB >> 17106667

[High-field and ultrahigh-field magnetic resonance imaging: new possibilities for imaging joints].

S Trattnig1, T C Mamisch, I Noebauer.   

Abstract

Whole-body MR tomography at 3 T is moving steadily from research into routine clinical practice. The most important advantage of high-field MRI is the higher signal to noise ratio, which allows acquisitions in the musculo-skeletal system with higher resolution within the same scan time. The imaging of small joints, the visualization of labral anatomy and pathology in the shoulder and hip joints, as well as cartilage imaging will benefit from higher resolution protocols. In addition to improved morphological imaging of articular cartilage, the higher sensitivity of 3 T allows the clinical use of advanced MR techniques of cartilage such as T1 and T2 mapping, diffusion and sodium imaging. The improved spectral resolution with the higher field may improve metabolic imaging of tumors of the skeleton and soft tissues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17106667     DOI: 10.1007/s00393-006-0121-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Rheumatol        ISSN: 0340-1855            Impact factor:   1.372


  19 in total

1.  High-resolution MR imaging of the knee at 3 T.

Authors:  M Niitsu; T Nakai; K Ikeda; G Y Tang; H Yoshioka; Y Itai
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.990

2.  Routine MR examination of the knee using parallel imaging.

Authors:  M Niitsu; K Ikeda
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.350

3.  Proteoglycan loss in human knee cartilage: quantitation with sodium MR imaging--feasibility study.

Authors:  Andrew J Wheaton; Arijitt Borthakur; Erik M Shapiro; Ravinder R Regatte; Sarma V S Akella; J Bruce Kneeland; Ravinder Reddy
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  3D imaging of the whole spine at 3T compared to 1.5T: initial experiences.

Authors:  E A Rodegerdts; A Boss; K Riemarzik; M Lichy; F Schick; C D Claussen; H P Schlemmer
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.990

Review 5.  3T MR imaging of the musculoskeletal system (Part I): considerations, coils, and challenges.

Authors:  R Richard Ramnath
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.266

6.  MR imaging of articular cartilage at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of SPGR and SSFP sequences.

Authors:  P R Kornaat; S B Reeder; S Koo; J H Brittain; H Yu; T P Andriacchi; G E Gold
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 6.576

7.  Musculoskeletal tumors: use of proton MR spectroscopic imaging for characterization.

Authors:  Laura M Fayad; David A Bluemke; Edward F McCarthy; Kristin L Weber; Peter B Barker; Michael A Jacobs
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 8.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of the musculoskeletal system in humans.

Authors:  A Baur; M F Reiser
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 9.  Advanced magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage.

Authors:  Garry E Gold; Brian A Hargreaves; Kathryn J Stevens; Christopher F Beaulieu
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.472

10.  Proteoglycan and collagen sensitive MRI evaluation of normal and degenerated articular cartilage.

Authors:  M J Nissi; J Töyräs; M S Laasanen; J Rieppo; S Saarakkala; R Lappalainen; J S Jurvelin; M T Nieminen
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.494

View more
  5 in total

1.  [Therapy relevant imaging in modern surgical treatment of arthrosis of the shoulder : Interesting facts for orthopedic surgeons].

Authors:  R M Krifter
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  [Researcher of the month].

Authors:  Iris-Melanie Nöbauer-Huhmann
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 3.  [Therapy relevant imaging in modern surgical treatment of arthrosis of the shoulder: interesting facts for orthopedic surgeons].

Authors:  R M Krifter; C Zweiger; W Lick-Schiffer; G Mattiassich; C Schüller-Weidekamm; R Radl
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  [Coxarthrosis--an update].

Authors:  H Imhof; I Nöbauer-Huhmann; S Trattnig
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Single-row vs. double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: clinical and 3 Tesla MR arthrography results.

Authors:  Cosimo Tudisco; Salvatore Bisicchia; Eugenio Savarese; Roberto Fiori; Dario A Bartolucci; Salvatore Masala; Giovanni Simonetti
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-01-27       Impact factor: 2.362

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.