Literature DB >> 17106623

Inhibition of porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) in primary porcine cells by RNA interference using lentiviral vectors.

B Dieckhoff1, A Karlas, A Hofmann, W A Kues, B Petersen, A Pfeifer, H Niemann, R Kurth, J Denner.   

Abstract

A potential risk in pig-to-human xenotransplantation is the transmission of PERVs to human recipients. Here we show for the first time the inhibition of PERV expression in primary porcine cells by RNA interference using lentiviral vectors. Cells were transduced with lentiviral vectors coding for short hairpin (sh) RNAs directed against PERV. In all primary porcine cells studied and in the porcine kidney cell line PK-15, expression of PERV-mRNA was significantly reduced as measured by real-time PCR. Most importantly, expression of PERV proteins was almost completely suppressed, as shown by Western blot analysis. Thus, lentiviral shRNA vectors could be used to knockdown PERV expression and create transgenic pigs with a reduced risk of PERV transmission during xenotransplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17106623     DOI: 10.1007/s00705-006-0868-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Virol        ISSN: 0304-8608            Impact factor:   2.574


  18 in total

1.  Retroviral restriction factors and infectious risk in xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Y Meije; R R Tönjes; J A Fishman
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 2.  Pig-to-Primate Islet Xenotransplantation: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Zhengzhao Liu; Wenbao Hu; Tian He; Yifan Dai; Hidetaka Hara; Rita Bottino; David K C Cooper; Zhiming Cai; Lisha Mou
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 3.  Regulation of Clinical Xenotransplantation-Time for a Reappraisal.

Authors:  David K C Cooper; Richard N Pierson; Bernhard J Hering; Muhammad M Mohiuddin; Jay A Fishman; Joachim Denner; Curie Ahn; Agnes M Azimzadeh; Leo H Buhler; Peter J Cowan; Wayne J Hawthorne; Takaaki Kobayashi; David H Sachs
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  RNA interference in pigs: comparison of RNAi test systems and expression vectors.

Authors:  Claudia Merkl; Simon Leuchs; Anja Saalfrank; Alexander Kind; Angelika Schnieke
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.695

5.  Incidence of Neoplasia in Pigs and Its Relevance to Clinical Organ Xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Abhijit Jagdale; Hayato Iwase; Edwin C Klein; David Kc Cooper
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 0.982

6.  Restriction of porcine endogenous retrovirus by porcine APOBEC3 cytidine deaminases.

Authors:  Eva Dörrschuck; Nicole Fischer; Ignacio G Bravo; Kay-Martin Hanschmann; Heidi Kuiper; Andreas Spötter; Ronny Möller; Klaus Cichutek; Carsten Münk; Ralf R Tönjes
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 7.  Infection barriers to successful xenotransplantation focusing on porcine endogenous retroviruses.

Authors:  Joachim Denner; Ralf R Tönjes
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 8.  The role of genetically engineered pigs in xenotransplantation research.

Authors:  David K C Cooper; Burcin Ekser; Jagdeece Ramsoondar; Carol Phelps; David Ayares
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 7.996

Review 9.  Perspectives on the Optimal Genetically Engineered Pig in 2018 for Initial Clinical Trials of Kidney or Heart Xenotransplantation.

Authors:  David K C Cooper; Mohamed Ezzelarab; Hayato Iwase; Hidetaka Hara
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 10.  Will Genetic Engineering Carry Xenotransplantation of Pig Islets to the Clinic?

Authors:  Elisabeth Kemter; Joachim Denner; Eckhard Wolf
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 4.810

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.