Literature DB >> 17106491

Patient-centeredness and timeliness in a primary care network: baseline analysis and power assessment for detection of the effects of an electronic health record.

Neil S Fleming1, Jeph Herrin, William Roberts, Carl Couch, David J Ballard.   

Abstract

Electronic health records are expected to improve all six dimensions of quality care identified by the Institute of Medicine (safety, timeliness, effectiveness, efficiency, equity, and patient-centeredness). HealthTexas Provider Network, the ambulatory care network affiliated with the Baylor Health Care System in Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas, is implementing a networkwide ambulatory electronic health record (AEHR). To evaluate the quality of care and financial impact of the AEHR implementation, we examined the available indicators for quantitatively measuring performance in each dimension of quality. For patient-centeredness, the primary data source available is the patient satisfaction survey. To achieve a broad view of patient-centeredness, we identified two measures of satisfaction (overall satisfaction with the physician and willingness to refer the physician) to be examined individually and used additional survey items to construct physician interaction and organizational scales. These scales showed good reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.95 and 0.89, respectively) and predictive ability ranging from 77% to 93% when applied to the overall satisfaction measures. Data from September 2003 to June 2006 showed mean pre-AEHR implementation baseline performance of 22.9 (±3.3) on the 25-point physician interaction scale and 38.0 (±5.8) on the 45-point organizational scale; 70.9% of patients reported excellent satisfaction with their physician, and 97.6% of patients reported willingness to refer. Timeliness data were collected using the same survey. Baseline performance showed that 43.4% of patients waited <2 days between making and keeping an appointment, and 50.6% of patients waited <5 minutes past appointment time. However, 12.5% waited >30 days between making and keeping an appointment, and 14.0% waited >30 minutes past appointment time. The power to detect changes in the patient-centeredness and timeliness measures in the 3-year multiple time series evaluation of the quality and financial impact of the AEHR was investigated and showed that even small changes in these measures will be detectable.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 17106491      PMCID: PMC1618751          DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2006.11928191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)        ISSN: 0899-8280


  7 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of computer-based patient record systems and quality of care: more randomized clinical trials or a broader approach?

Authors:  Cyrille Delpierre; Lise Cuzin; Judith Fillaux; Muriel Alvarez; Patrice Massip; Thierry Lang
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.038

2.  Measuring patient satisfaction for quality improvement.

Authors:  L E Harris; R W Swindle; S M Mungai; M Weinberger; W M Tierney
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Medical groups' adoption of electronic health records and information systems.

Authors:  David Gans; John Kralewski; Terry Hammons; Bryan Dowd
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Continuity of care and other determinants of patient satisfaction with primary care.

Authors:  Vincent S Fan; Marcia Burman; Mary B McDonell; Stephan D Fihn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Patients' ratings of outpatient visits in different practice settings. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

Authors:  H R Rubin; B Gandek; W H Rogers; M Kosinski; C A McHorney; J E Ware
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Measuring patient satisfaction with physicians among older and diseased adults in a primary care municipal outpatient setting. An examination of three instruments.

Authors:  T E Stump; P R Dexter; W M Tierney; F D Wolinsky
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Patient satisfaction with primary care: does type of practitioner matter?

Authors:  Douglas W Roblin; Edmund R Becker; E Kathleen Adams; David H Howard; Melissa H Roberts
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.983

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  PATIENTS' SATISFACTION WITH HEALTH SERVICES AT THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC HEALTH OF KOSOVA.

Authors:  Naser Ramadani; Valbona Zhjeqi; Merita Berisha; Rina Hoxha; Sanije Gashi; Ilir Begolli; Drita Salihu; Sefedin Muçaj
Journal:  Mater Sociomed       Date:  2016-06-01

2.  Informing primary care reform in Greece: patient expectations and experiences (the QUALICOPC study).

Authors:  Christos Lionis; Sophia Papadakis; Chrysanthi Tatsi; Antonis Bertsias; George Duijker; Prodromos-Bodosakis Mekouris; Wienke Boerma; Willemijn Schäfer
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 2.655

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.