Literature DB >> 10599602

Measuring patient satisfaction for quality improvement.

L E Harris1, R W Swindle, S M Mungai, M Weinberger, W M Tierney.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surveys used for health plan quality reporting are generally administered annually to health plan enrollees to assess satisfaction with both the health plan and health care services. Therefore, surveys may lack sensitivity to measure the effects of patient-focused, quality improvement initiatives that could demonstrate results in a shorter time period.
OBJECTIVES: We describe the development and testing of a multidimensional, visit-specific measure of satisfaction with primary care that may be used in quality improvement.
METHODS: Conducted in five adult and pediatric primary care sites serving a commercial, largely managed-care population, the survey includes the Medical Outcomes Study Visit-Specific Questionnaire, the American Board of Internal Medicine Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire, and locally developed items. We assessed the instrument's reliability, validity, and utility for quality improvement.
RESULTS: For both adult and pediatric samples, three factors emerged: satisfaction with the provider, satisfaction with access, and satisfaction with the office. Satisfaction with the provider and with the office were independently correlated with overall satisfaction in both samples; satisfaction with access was significantly correlated with overall satisfaction only for adults. For adults, patients who disenrolled from the health plan were less satisfied with the office compared with patients who remained with the health plan. Finally, for adults, we detected significant differences across practice sites in terms of satisfaction with office and access; for children, there were intersite differences in terms of satisfaction with provider, office, and access.
CONCLUSIONS: We have support for the reliability and validity of this instrument that has identified differences in satisfaction between practice sites that may be used for quality improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10599602     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199912000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  22 in total

1.  Functional status and patient satisfaction: a comparison of ischemic heart disease, obstructive lung disease, and diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Vincent S Fan; Gayle E Reiber; Paula Diehr; Marcia Burman; Mary B McDonell; Stephan D Fihn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Congruent satisfaction: is there geographic correlation between patient and physician satisfaction?

Authors:  Jennifer DeVoe; George E Fryer; Alton Straub; Jessica McCann; Gerry Fairbrother
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Providers preferences towards greater patient health benefit is associated with higher quality of care.

Authors:  Seema Kacker; Tin Aung; Dominic Montagu; David Bishai
Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag       Date:  2021-06-04

4.  Validation of a questionnaire measuring patient satisfaction with general practitioner services.

Authors:  S Grogan; M Conner; P Norman; D Willits; I Porter
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2000-12

5.  Continuity of care and other determinants of patient satisfaction with primary care.

Authors:  Vincent S Fan; Marcia Burman; Mary B McDonell; Stephan D Fihn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  The effect of discussions about advance directives on patients' satisfaction with primary care.

Authors:  W M Tierney; P R Dexter; G P Gramelspacher; A J Perkins; X H Zhou; F D Wolinsky
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Determining the interviewer effect on CQ Index outcomes: a multilevel approach.

Authors:  Sjenny Winters; Mathilde H Strating; Niek S Klazinga; Rudolf B Kool; Robbert Huijsman
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Does satisfaction reflect the technical quality of mental health care?

Authors:  Mark J Edlund; Alexander S Young; Fuan Yue Kung; Cathy D Sherbourne; Kenneth B Wells
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Patient satisfaction, treatment experience, and disability outcomes in a population-based cohort of injured workers in Washington State: implications for quality improvement.

Authors:  Thomas M Wickizer; Gary Franklin; Deborah Fulton-Kehoe; Judith A Turner; Robert Mootz; Terri Smith-Weller
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Developing anchored measures of patient satisfaction with pharmaceutical care delivery: Experiences versus expectations.

Authors:  Rosemin Kassam; John B Collins; Jonathan Berkowitz
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 2.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.