Literature DB >> 17106401

Comparison of aberrometer and autorefractor measures of refractive error in children.

Aldo A Martinez1, Ashok Pandian, Padmaja Sankaridurg, Kathryn Rose, Son C Huynh, Paul Mitchell.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the Complete Ophthalmic Analysis System (COAS) G200 Aberrometer (Wavefront Sciences Inc., Albuquerque, NM) and Canon RK-F1 Autorefractor (Canon Inc., Tokyo, Japan) for measuring refractive errors in young children.
METHODS: The Sydney Myopia Study is a population-based study of refractive error and eye health in young Australian children. Cycloplegic refractions were performed on 1504 school year 1 students (mostly 6 years old) and 890 school year 7 (mostly 12 years old) students using both the COAS G200 Aberrometer and Canon RK-F1 autorefractor. Refractive data were analyzed using power vectors. Mean differences and 95% limits of agreement were determined for refractive components between the two instruments.
RESULTS: The mean age +/- standard deviation was 6.7 +/- 0.4 years (range, 5.5-9.1 years) and 12.6 +/- 0.5 years (range, 11.1-14.4 years) for the year 1 and year 7 students, respectively. Mean paired differences for the M component (spherical equivalent) between the COAS G200 and Canon RK-F1 were <0.25 D in both age groups and were statistically significant in the year 1 group only (p < 0.001). Small significant differences were found in the astigmatic components (J0 and J45) in both groups. A smaller coefficient of agreement for the M component was found in the older group (0.54 D), whereas the coefficients of agreement of the astigmatic components (J0 and J45) were similar for both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The COAS G200 aberrometer was an easy-to-use instrument for the measurement of refractive error in children. In addition to being able to measure higher and lower order aberrations, the COAS G200 provides refractive error measurements comparable to those of an autorefractor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17106401     DOI: 10.1097/01.opx.0000238708.74276.6c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  6 in total

1.  Comparing the relative peripheral refraction effect of single vision and multifocal contact lenses measured using an autorefractor and an aberrometer: A pilot study.

Authors:  Ravi C Bakaraju; Cathleen Fedtke; Klaus Ehrmann; Arthur Ho
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2015-02-07

2.  Non-cycloplegic spherical equivalent refraction in adults: comparison of the double-pass system, retinoscopy, subjective refraction and a table-mounted autorefractor.

Authors:  Meritxell Vilaseca; Montserrat Arjona; Jaume Pujol; Elvira Peris; Vanessa Martínez
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Evaluation of patient visual comfort and repeatability of refractive values in non-presbyopic healthy eyes.

Authors:  Francisco Segura; Ana Sanchez-Cano; Carmen Lopez de la Fuente; Lorena Fuentes-Broto; Isabel Pinilla
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Comparison of refractive assessment by wavefront aberrometry, autorefraction, and subjective refraction.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Bennett; Gina M Stalboerger; David O Hodge; Muriel M Schornack
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2014-12-11

5.  Accuracy of the Hand-held Wavefront Aberrometer in Measurement of Refractive Error.

Authors:  Jae Yong Han; Sangchul Yoon; Nicolas Scott Brown; Sueng Han Han; Jinu Han
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06

6.  Agreement and Repeatability of Noncycloplegic and Cycloplegic Wavefront-based Autorefraction in Children.

Authors:  Franziska G Rauscher; Heike Lange; Maryam Yahiaoui-Doktor; Helmut Tegetmeyer; Ina Sterker; Andreas Hinz; Siegfried Wahl; Peter Wiedemann; Arne Ohlendorf; Ralf Blendowske
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.973

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.