Literature DB >> 17105168

Characterizing electrospray ionization using atmospheric pressure ion mobility spectrometry.

Xiaoting Tang1, James E Bruce, Herbert H Hill.   

Abstract

Reduced flow rate electrospray ionization has been proven to provide improved sensitivity, less background noise, and improved limits of detections for ESI-MS analysis. Miniaturizing the ESI source from conventional electrospray to microelectrospray and further down to nanoelectrospray has resulted in higher and higher sensitivity; however, when effects of flow rate were investigated for atmospheric pressure ESI-IMS using a nanospray emitter, a striking opposite result was observed. The general tendency we observed in ESI-IMS was that higher flow rate offered higher ion signal intensity throughout a variety of conditions investigated. Thus, further efforts were undertaken to rationalize these contradictory results. It is well accepted that decreased flow rate increases both ionization efficiency and transmission efficiency, thus improving ion signal in ESI-MS. However, our study revealed that decreased flow rate results in decreased ion signal because ion transfer is constant, no matter how flow rate changes in ESI-IMS. Since ion transfer is constant in atmospheric pressure ESI-IMS, ionization efficiency can be studied independently, which otherwise is not possible in ESI-MS in which both ionization efficiency and transmission efficiency vary as conditions alter. In this article, we present a systematic study of signal intensity and ionization efficiency at various experimental conditions using ESI-IMS and demonstrate the ionization efficiency as a function of flow rate, analyte concentration, and solvent composition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17105168      PMCID: PMC3633478          DOI: 10.1021/ac0613380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  29 in total

1.  Secondary electrospray ionization ion mobility spectrometry/mass spectrometry of illicit drugs.

Authors:  C Wu; W F Siems; H H Hill
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Nanoelectrospray--more than just a minimized-flow electrospray ionization source.

Authors:  R Juraschek; T Dülcks; M Karas
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Improved ion transmission from atmospheric pressure to high vacuum using a multicapillary inlet and electrodynamic ion funnel interface

Authors: 
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Effect of different solution flow rates on analyte ion signals in nano-ESI MS, or: when does ESI turn into nano-ESI?

Authors:  Andrea Schmidt; Michael Karas; Thomas Dülcks
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 5.  Ultrasensitive and quantitative analyses from combined separations-mass spectrometry for the characterization of proteomes.

Authors:  Richard D Smith; Yufeng Shen; Keqi Tang
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 22.384

6.  Development of an ion mobility spectrometer for use in an atmospheric pressure ionization ion mobility spectrometer/mass spectrometer instrument for fast screening analysis.

Authors:  Alexey Sysoev; Alexey Adamov; Jyrki Viidanoja; Raimo A Ketola; Risto Kostiainen; Tapio Kotiaho
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Hadamard transform ion mobility spectrometry.

Authors:  Brian H Clowers; William F Siems; Herbert H Hill; Steven M Massick
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Analytical properties of the nanoelectrospray ion source.

Authors:  M Wilm; M Mann
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1996-01-01       Impact factor: 6.986

9.  Electrospray interface for liquid chromatographs and mass spectrometers.

Authors:  C M Whitehouse; R N Dreyer; M Yamashita; J B Fenn
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 6.986

10.  Mass spectrometry sampling under ambient conditions with desorption electrospray ionization.

Authors:  Zoltán Takáts; Justin M Wiseman; Bogdan Gologan; R Graham Cooks
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  5 in total

1.  A study of electrospray ionization emitters with differing geometries with respect to flow rate and electrospray voltage.

Authors:  Brent R Reschke; Aaron T Timperman
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Picoelectrospray ionization mass spectrometry using narrow-bore chemically etched emitters.

Authors:  Ioan Marginean; Keqi Tang; Richard D Smith; Ryan T Kelly
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  On the ionization and ion transmission efficiencies of different ESI-MS interfaces.

Authors:  Jonathan T Cox; Ioan Marginean; Richard D Smith; Keqi Tang
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.109

4.  Monte carlo simulation of macromolecular ionization by nanoelectrospray.

Authors:  Christopher J Hogan; Pratim Biswas
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 3.109

5.  Detection of nitro-based and peroxide-based explosives by fast polarity-switchable ion mobility spectrometer with ion focusing in vicinity of Faraday detector.

Authors:  Qinghua Zhou; Liying Peng; Dandan Jiang; Xin Wang; Haiyan Wang; Haiyang Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.