OBJECTIVE: We investigated if tau, microtubular binding protein, in serum and ventricular CSF (vCSF) in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) during the initial posttraumatic days correlated to 1-year outcome. METHODS: Patients with severe TBI (n = 39, Glasgow Coma Scale score <or=8) were included. We measured serum and vCSF total tau on days 0 to 14, using ELISA. vCSF total tau correlated to 1-year Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE), the NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) neurologic status, and the Bartel Daily Living Index. Patients (n = 20) with normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) served as reference. RESULTS: Higher levels of tau were found in TBI patients vs patients with NPH. A correlation was found between initial vCSF total tau and GOSE levels (R = 0.42, p < 0.001) but not between vCSF total tau and NIHSS or Bartel scores at 1 year. A vCSF total tau level of >2,126 pg/mL on days 2 to 3 discriminated between dead and alive (sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 81%). A vCSF total tau level of >702 pg/mL on days 2 to 3 discriminated between bad (GOSE 1 to 4) and good (GOSE 5 to 8) outcome (sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 69%). Patients with GOSE 1 (dead) had higher vCSF total tau levels on days 2 to 3 (p < 0.001) vs both surviving patients (GOSE 2 to 8) and those with NPH. Total tau was not detected in serum throughout the study. CONCLUSION: The increase in ventricular CSF (vCSF) total tau probably reflects axonal damage, known to be a central pathologic mechanism in traumatic brain injury (TBI). These results suggest that vCSF total tau may be an important early biochemical neuromarker for predicting long-term outcome in patients with a severe TBI.
OBJECTIVE: We investigated if tau, microtubular binding protein, in serum and ventricular CSF (vCSF) in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) during the initial posttraumatic days correlated to 1-year outcome. METHODS:Patients with severe TBI (n = 39, Glasgow Coma Scale score <or=8) were included. We measured serum and vCSF total tau on days 0 to 14, using ELISA. vCSF total tau correlated to 1-year Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE), the NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) neurologic status, and the Bartel Daily Living Index. Patients (n = 20) with normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) served as reference. RESULTS: Higher levels of tau were found in TBIpatients vs patients with NPH. A correlation was found between initial vCSF total tau and GOSE levels (R = 0.42, p < 0.001) but not between vCSF total tau and NIHSS or Bartel scores at 1 year. A vCSF total tau level of >2,126 pg/mL on days 2 to 3 discriminated between dead and alive (sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 81%). A vCSF total tau level of >702 pg/mL on days 2 to 3 discriminated between bad (GOSE 1 to 4) and good (GOSE 5 to 8) outcome (sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 69%). Patients with GOSE 1 (dead) had higher vCSF total tau levels on days 2 to 3 (p < 0.001) vs both surviving patients (GOSE 2 to 8) and those with NPH. Total tau was not detected in serum throughout the study. CONCLUSION: The increase in ventricular CSF (vCSF) total tau probably reflects axonal damage, known to be a central pathologic mechanism in traumatic brain injury (TBI). These results suggest that vCSF total tau may be an important early biochemical neuromarker for predicting long-term outcome in patients with a severe TBI.
Authors: Charles B Malpas; Michael M Saling; Dennis Velakoulis; Patricia Desmond; Terence J O'Brien Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2015 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: David J Irwin; Alberto Lleó; Sharon X Xie; Corey T McMillan; David A Wolk; Edward B Lee; Viviana M Van Deerlin; Leslie M Shaw; John Q Trojanowski; Murray Grossman Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2017-08-19 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Michelle M Mielke; Clinton E Hagen; Jing Xu; Xiyun Chai; Prashanthi Vemuri; Val J Lowe; David C Airey; David S Knopman; Rosebud O Roberts; Mary M Machulda; Clifford R Jack; Ronald C Petersen; Jeffrey L Dage Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2018-04-05 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Harald Hampel; Yong Shen; Dominic M Walsh; Paul Aisen; Les M Shaw; Henrik Zetterberg; John Q Trojanowski; Kaj Blennow Journal: Exp Neurol Date: 2009-10-06 Impact factor: 5.330
Authors: Clifford R Jack; David S Knopman; William J Jagust; Leslie M Shaw; Paul S Aisen; Michael W Weiner; Ronald C Petersen; John Q Trojanowski Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Carlos Cruchaga; John S K Kauwe; Kevin Mayo; Noah Spiegel; Sarah Bertelsen; Petra Nowotny; Aarti R Shah; Richard Abraham; Paul Hollingworth; Denise Harold; Michael M Owen; Julie Williams; Simon Lovestone; Elaine R Peskind; Ge Li; James B Leverenz; Douglas Galasko; John C Morris; Anne M Fagan; David M Holtzman; Alison M Goate Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2010-09-16 Impact factor: 5.917