BACKGROUND: This is a preliminary report of an ongoing prospective bimodality lung cancer surveillance trial for high-risk patients. Bimodality surveillance incorporates autofluorescence bronchoscopy (AFB) and spiral CT (SCT) scanning in high-risk patients as a primary lung cancer surveillance strategy, based entirely on risk factors. AFB was used for surveillance and findings were compared with conventional sputum cytology for the detection of malignancy and pre-malignant central airway lesions. METHODS: 402 patients registering at Roswell Park Cancer Institute were evaluated with spirometric testing, chest radiography, history and physical examination, of which 207 were deemed eligible for the study. For eligibility, patients were required to have at least two of the following risk factors: (1) > or =20 pack year history of tobacco use, (2) asbestos-related lung disease on the chest radiograph, (3) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with a forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) <70% of predicted, and (4) prior aerodigestive cancer treated with curative intent, with no evidence of disease for >2 years. All eligible patients underwent AFB, a low-dose SCT scan of the chest without contrast, and a sputum sample was collected for cytological examination. Bronchoscopic biopsy findings were correlated with sputum cytology results, SCT-detected pulmonary nodules and surveillance-detected cancers. To date, 186 have been enrolled with 169 completing the surveillance procedures. RESULTS: Thirteen lung cancers (7%) were detected in the 169 subjects who have completed all three surveillance studies to date. Pre-malignant changes were common and 66% of patients had squamous metaplasia or worse. Conventional sputum cytology missed 100% of the dysplasias and 68% of the metaplasias detected by AFB, and failed to detect any cases of carcinoma or carcinoma-in-situ in this patient cohort. Sputum cytology exhibited 33% sensitivity and 64% specificity for the presence of metaplasia. Seven of 13 lung cancers (58%) were stage Ia or less, including three patients with squamous cell carcinoma. Patients with peripheral pulmonary nodules identified by SCT scanning of the chest were 3.16 times more likely to exhibit pre-malignant changes on AFB (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Bimodality surveillance will detect central lung cancer and pre-malignancy in patients with multiple lung cancer risk factors, even when conventional sputum cytology is negative. AFB should be considered in high-risk patients, regardless of sputum cytology findings.
BACKGROUND: This is a preliminary report of an ongoing prospective bimodality lung cancer surveillance trial for high-risk patients. Bimodality surveillance incorporates autofluorescence bronchoscopy (AFB) and spiral CT (SCT) scanning in high-risk patients as a primary lung cancer surveillance strategy, based entirely on risk factors. AFB was used for surveillance and findings were compared with conventional sputum cytology for the detection of malignancy and pre-malignant central airway lesions. METHODS: 402 patients registering at Roswell Park Cancer Institute were evaluated with spirometric testing, chest radiography, history and physical examination, of which 207 were deemed eligible for the study. For eligibility, patients were required to have at least two of the following risk factors: (1) > or =20 pack year history of tobacco use, (2) asbestos-related lung disease on the chest radiograph, (3) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with a forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) <70% of predicted, and (4) prior aerodigestive cancer treated with curative intent, with no evidence of disease for >2 years. All eligible patients underwent AFB, a low-dose SCT scan of the chest without contrast, and a sputum sample was collected for cytological examination. Bronchoscopic biopsy findings were correlated with sputum cytology results, SCT-detected pulmonary nodules and surveillance-detected cancers. To date, 186 have been enrolled with 169 completing the surveillance procedures. RESULTS: Thirteen lung cancers (7%) were detected in the 169 subjects who have completed all three surveillance studies to date. Pre-malignant changes were common and 66% of patients had squamous metaplasia or worse. Conventional sputum cytology missed 100% of the dysplasias and 68% of the metaplasias detected by AFB, and failed to detect any cases of carcinoma or carcinoma-in-situ in this patient cohort. Sputum cytology exhibited 33% sensitivity and 64% specificity for the presence of metaplasia. Seven of 13 lung cancers (58%) were stage Ia or less, including three patients with squamous cell carcinoma. Patients with peripheral pulmonary nodules identified by SCT scanning of the chest were 3.16 times more likely to exhibit pre-malignant changes on AFB (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Bimodality surveillance will detect central lung cancer and pre-malignancy in patients with multiple lung cancer risk factors, even when conventional sputum cytology is negative. AFB should be considered in high-risk patients, regardless of sputum cytology findings.
Authors: S Bota; J B Auliac; C Paris; J Métayer; R Sesboüé; G Nouvet; L Thiberville Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2001-11-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: M Sato; A Sakurada; M Sagawa; M Minowa; H Takahashi; T Oyaizu; Y Okada; Y Matsumura; T Tanita; T Kondo Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: P M Marcus; E J Bergstralh; R M Fagerstrom; D E Williams; R Fontana; W F Taylor; P C Prorok Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-08-16 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Stephen J Swensen; James R Jett; Jeff A Sloan; David E Midthun; Thomas E Hartman; Anne-Marie Sykes; Gregory L Aughenbaugh; Frank E Zink; Shauna L Hillman; Gayle R Noetzel; Randolph S Marks; Amy C Clayton; Peter C Pairolero Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2002-02-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Douglas A Corley; Theodore R Levin; Laurel A Habel; Noel S Weiss; Patricia A Buffler Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Peter B Bach; Michael W Kattan; Mark D Thornquist; Mark G Kris; Ramsey C Tate; Matt J Barnett; Lillian J Hsieh; Colin B Begg Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2003-03-19 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Parthiv J Mahadevia; Lee A Fleisher; Kevin D Frick; John Eng; Steven N Goodman; Neil R Powe Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-01-15 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: S M Jamshedur Rahman; Adriana L Gonzalez; Ming Li; Erin H Seeley; Lisa J Zimmerman; Xueqiong J Zhang; M Lisa Manier; Sandra J Olson; Ronak N Shah; Alison N Miller; Joe B Putnam; York E Miller; Wilbur A Franklin; William J Blot; David P Carbone; Yu Shyr; Richard M Caprioli; Pierre P Massion Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2011-04-12 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Bojan Zaric; Branislav Perin; Heinrich D Becker; Felix Fj Herth; Ralf Eberhardt; Svetlana Jovanovic; Tihomir Orlic; Milana Panjkovic; Biljana Zvezdin; Aleksandra Jovelic; Milorad Bijelovic; Vladimir Jurisic; Milan Antonic Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2011-08-09 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: Ruth L Katz; Tanweer M Zaidi; Ricardo L Fernandez; Jingpin Zhang; Weigong He; Charisse Acosta; Michal Daniely; Lea Madi; Mary A Vargas; Qiong Dong; Xiaoying Gao; Xiaoying Gao Feng Jiang; Feng Jiang; Nancy P Caraway; Ara A Vaporciyan; Jack A Roth; Margaret R Spitz Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2008-05-23 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Pyng Lee; Remco M van den Berg; Stephen Lam; Adi F Gazdar; Katrien Grunberg; Annette McWilliams; Jean Leriche; Pieter E Postmus; Tom G Sutedja Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-07-07 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Robert A A VAN Boerdonk; Hes A P Brokx; Pyng Lee; Clarissa Kooi; Pieter E Postmus; Peter J F Snijders; Katrien Grünberg; Erik Thunnissen; Thomas G Sutedja; Johannes M A Daniels; Daniëlle A M Heideman Journal: Oncol Lett Date: 2013-03-19 Impact factor: 2.967