Literature DB >> 10944552

Lung cancer mortality in the Mayo Lung Project: impact of extended follow-up.

P M Marcus1, E J Bergstralh, R M Fagerstrom, D E Williams, R Fontana, W F Taylor, P C Prorok.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Mayo Lung Project (MLP) was a randomized, controlled clinical trial of lung cancer screening that was conducted in 9211 male smokers between 1971 and 1983. The intervention arm was offered chest x-ray and sputum cytology every 4 months for 6 years; the usual-care arm was advised at trial entry to receive the same tests annually. No lung cancer mortality benefit was evident at the end of the study. We have extended follow-up through 1996.
METHODS: A National Death Index-PLUS search was used to assign vital status and date and cause of death for 6523 participants with unknown information. The median survival for lung cancer patients diagnosed before July 1, 1983, was calculated by use of Kaplan-Meier estimates. Survival curves were compared with the log-rank test.
RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 20.5 years. Lung cancer mortality was 4.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.9-4.9) deaths per 1000 person-years in the intervention arm and 3.9 (95% CI = 3.5-4.4) in the usual-care arm (two-sided P: for difference =.09). For participants diagnosed with lung cancer before July 1, 1983, survival was better in the intervention arm (two-sided P: =.0039). The median survival for patients with resected early-stage disease was 16.0 years in the intervention arm versus 5.0 years in the usual-care arm.
CONCLUSIONS: Extended follow-up of MLP participants did not reveal a lung cancer mortality reduction for the intervention arm. Similar mortality but better survival for individuals in the intervention arm indicates that some lesions with limited clinical relevance may have been identified in the intervention arm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10944552     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/92.16.1308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  95 in total

Review 1.  Spiral computed tomography screening: study begins to determine its efficacy in lung cancer prevention.

Authors:  B S Kramer
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2001-04

Review 2.  Genetic testing for lung cancer risk: if physicians can do it, should they?

Authors:  Theodore W Marcy; Michael Stefanek; Kimberly M Thompson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Principles of cancer screening: lessons from history and study design issues.

Authors:  Jennifer M Croswell; David F Ransohoff; Barnett S Kramer
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.929

4.  The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design.

Authors:  Denise R Aberle; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Timothy R Church; Richard M Fagerstrom; Barbara Galen; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Jonathan Goldin; John K Gohagan; Bruce Hillman; Carl Jaffe; Barnett S Kramer; David Lynch; Pamela M Marcus; Mitchell Schnall; Daniel C Sullivan; Dorothy Sullivan; Carl J Zylak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Lung cancer screening: past, present and future.

Authors:  James H Finigan; Jeffrey A Kern
Journal:  Clin Chest Med       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 2.878

6.  Is screening for lung cancer using low dose spiral CT scanning worthwhile?

Authors:  F V Gleeson
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 9.139

7.  Attitudes towards screening for lung cancer among smokers and their non-smoking counterparts.

Authors:  Gerard A Silvestri; Paul J Nietert; James Zoller; Cindy Carter; David Bradford
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 8.  Carcinoma of the bronchus 60 years later.

Authors:  G A Silvestri; S G Spiro
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 9.139

9.  Overdiagnosis in low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer.

Authors:  Edward F Patz; Paul Pinsky; Constantine Gatsonis; Jorean D Sicks; Barnett S Kramer; Martin C Tammemägi; Caroline Chiles; William C Black; Denise R Aberle
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 10.  Lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Antonio Gutierrez; Robert Suh; Fereidoun Abtin; Scott Genshaft; Kathleen Brown
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.513

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.