Literature DB >> 17101237

Time left in the mouse.

Sara Cordes1, Adam Philip King, C R Gallistel.   

Abstract

Evidence suggests that the online combination of non-verbal magnitudes (durations, numerosities) is central to learning in both human and non-human animals [Gallistel, C.R., 1990. The Organization of Learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA]. The molecular basis of these computations, however, is an open question at this point. The current study provides the first direct test of temporal subtraction in a species in which the genetic code is available. In two experiments, mice were run in an adaptation of Gibbon and Church's [Gibbon, J., Church, R.M., 1981. Time left: linear versus logarithmic subjective time. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 7, 87-107] time left paradigm in order to characterize typical responding in this task. Both experiments suggest that mice engaged in online subtraction of temporal values, although the generalization of a learned response rule to novel stimulus values resulted in slightly less systematic responding. Potential explanations for this pattern of results are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17101237     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.10.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  3 in total

Review 1.  Comprehensive neurocognitive endophenotyping strategies for mouse models of genetic disorders.

Authors:  Michael R Hunsaker
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 11.685

2.  Symbol addition by monkeys provides evidence for normalized quantity coding.

Authors:  Margaret S Livingstone; Warren W Pettine; Krishna Srihasam; Brandon Moore; Istvan A Morocz; Daeyeol Lee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Time and number: the privileged status of small values in the brain.

Authors:  Catalin V Buhusi; Sara Cordes
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-31
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.